Baur Isabella Diana, Khoramnia Ramin, Son Hyeck-Soo, Auffarth Gerd Uwe, Łabuz Grzegorz
David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Augsburg University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Augsburg, Germany.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 May 21;19:1673-1682. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S520086. eCollection 2025.
We compared two hybrid refractive-diffractive IOLs with enhanced depth of focus in an in vitro study with regard to optical quality in monochromatic and polychromatic light as well as their ray-propagation behavior.
The Mono-EDoF ME4 IOL (Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) and the Tecnis Symfony IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision, USA) were assessed using the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 (Trioptics GmbH, Germany) to measure the through focus (TF) modulation transfer function (MTF) using monochromatic green (546 nm) and polychromatic light at different spatial frequencies. Ray propagation imaging was performed using monochromatic green light (520 nm) projected through each IOL, while submerged in a bath of fluorescein solution. The visual pathways were captured by a camera mounted on a microscope. Ray visualization was additionally performed for a monofocal control IOL (W60-R IOL, Santen Pharmaceutical).
The Mono-EDoF IOL showed superior TF-MTF performance for defocus of up to -1.3D compared to the Symfony IOL in monochromatic and polychromatic light. For higher defocus values, however, the Symfony showed superior performance than the Mono-EDoF. Image quality in polychromatic light decreased for both IOLs compared to monochromatic light. Ray propagation imaging revealed one distinct focus for the monofocal IOL. The Mono-EDoF demonstrated an elongated focus area. The Symfony showed two focal points.
We found comparable deterioration of image quality in polychromatic light for both IOLs with improved intermediate range. The Mono-EDoF demonstrated an elongated focus and superior TF-MTF performance at lower defocus values, but it did not match the standard EDoF model at higher defocus.
在一项体外研究中,我们比较了两种具有增强景深的混合折射 - 衍射人工晶状体在单色光和多色光下的光学质量及其光线传播行为。
使用OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2(德国Trioptics GmbH公司)对Mono-EDoF ME4人工晶状体(日本大阪参天制药公司)和Tecnis Symfony人工晶状体(美国强生视力健公司)进行评估,以测量在不同空间频率下使用单色绿光(546纳米)和多色光时的全聚焦(TF)调制传递函数(MTF)。在浸没于荧光素溶液浴中的情况下,使用通过每个人工晶状体投射的单色绿光(520纳米)进行光线传播成像。视觉路径由安装在显微镜上的相机捕获。此外,还对单焦点对照人工晶状体(W60-R人工晶状体,参天制药公司)进行了光线可视化。
在单色光和多色光下,与Symfony人工晶状体相比,Mono-EDoF人工晶状体在高达 -1.3D 的散焦情况下表现出卓越的TF-MTF性能。然而,对于更高的散焦值,Symfony表现优于Mono-EDoF。与单色光相比,两种人工晶状体在多色光下的图像质量均下降。光线传播成像显示单焦点人工晶状体有一个明显的焦点。Mono-EDoF显示出一个拉长的焦点区域。Symfony显示出两个焦点。
我们发现,两种人工晶状体在多色光下的图像质量均有类似程度的下降,但中间范围有所改善。Mono-EDoF在较低散焦值时显示出拉长的焦点和卓越的TF-MTF性能,但在较高散焦时不符合标准的增强景深模型。