• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简短自评式智慧量表的编制与验证。

Development and validation of a brief self-assessed wisdom scale.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1456-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-020-1456-9
PMID:32050901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7017457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This longitudinal study aimed to develop a nine-item Brief Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (BSAWS) derived from the original 40-item Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS).

METHODS

The psychometric properties of the shortened scale were evaluated based on a sample of 157 older adults. The factor structure and dimensionality of the original SAWS were examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Subsequent explorative factor analysis of the BSAWS supported the construct validity of the shortened scale.

RESULTS

The internal consistency, convergent validity and construct validity of the shortened scale were also evaluated and the results indicated that the BSAWS possesses good psychometric properties and is comparable with the full version.

CONCLUSIONS

This scale refinement may help researchers and practitioners conduct epistemological surveys or clinical research related to wisdom.

摘要

背景

本纵向研究旨在从原始的 40 项自我评估智慧量表(SAWS)中开发出一个九项简短自我评估智慧量表(BSAWS)。

方法

根据 157 名老年人的样本,评估了缩短量表的心理测量特性。使用验证性因子分析检验了原始 SAWS 的因子结构和维度。BSAWS 的后续探索性因子分析支持缩短量表的结构效度。

结果

还评估了缩短量表的内部一致性、收敛效度和构念效度,结果表明 BSAWS 具有良好的心理测量特性,并且与完整版本相当。

结论

这种量表的细化可能有助于研究人员和从业者进行与智慧相关的认识论调查或临床研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b2/7017457/c8d47d0db78b/12877_2020_1456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b2/7017457/c8d47d0db78b/12877_2020_1456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23b2/7017457/c8d47d0db78b/12877_2020_1456_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a brief self-assessed wisdom scale.简短自评式智慧量表的编制与验证。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1456-9.
2
Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale.简短智慧发展量表的编制及心理测量学特性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082717.
3
Validating the Self-assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) in an Iranian Sample: Psychometric and Developmental Findings.验证伊朗样本中的自我评估智慧量表(SAWS):心理测量和发展发现。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2021 Dec;36(4):407-429. doi: 10.1007/s10823-021-09442-y. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
An evaluation of the factor structure of the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) and the creation of the SAWS-15 as a short measure for personal wisdom.自我评估智慧量表(SAWS)的因子结构评估以及作为个人智慧简短测量工具的SAWS-15的编制。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Mar;34(3):241-251. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220004202. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Measuring the character strength of wisdom.衡量智慧的性格优势。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2007;65(2):163-83. doi: 10.2190/AG.65.2.d.
6
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析开发并验证 6 项修订版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(RULS-6)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a brief parenting scale (PS-7) for the parents of adolescents.发展和评估一个简短的青少年父母养育量表(PS-7)的心理计量特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228287. eCollection 2020.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia.在西伯利亚生活的老年人样本中,对俄罗斯版繁荣量表进行心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 11;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1100-6.
9
The Mindful Eating Behavior Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties in a Sample of Dutch Adults Aged 55 Years and Older.正念饮食行为量表:在 55 岁及以上荷兰成年人样本中的发展和心理测量特性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jul;118(7):1277-1290.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
10
A Polish adaptation of the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) in older adults.老年人自我评估智慧量表(SAWS)的波兰语改编版。
Psychiatr Pol. 2022 Jun 28:1-19. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/148203.

引用本文的文献

1
A three-arm randomized controlled trial protocol: Effects of telephone-based, layperson-delivered wisdom-enhancement narrative therapy and empathy-focused interventions on loneliness, social, and mental health in older adults.一项三臂随机对照试验方案:基于电话的、由非专业人员提供的智慧提升叙事疗法和以同理心为重点的干预措施对老年人孤独感、社交和心理健康的影响
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Mar 29;45:101479. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101479. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Development of inferiority-compensation scale among high school students.高中生自卑补偿量表的编制。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03979-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Dimensionality and Psychometric Properties of the Brief Self-Control Scale Amongst Chinese University Students.评估中国大学生简短自我控制量表的维度及心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 8;10:2903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02903. eCollection 2019.
2
Relationship between meaning in life and death anxiety in the elderly: self-esteem as a mediator.老年人生活意义与死亡焦虑的关系:自尊作为中介。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1316-7.
3
Cross-cultural validation of the Social Media Disorder scale.
Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the 5-Item WHO Well-Being Index.
5 项世界卫生组织幸福指数中文版的有效性和心理测量学评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;10:872436. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872436. eCollection 2022.
4
Narrative Group Intervention to Rediscover Life Wisdom Among Hong Kong Chinese Older Adults: A Single-Blind Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial.叙事小组干预以重新发现香港华裔老年人的生活智慧:一项单盲随机候补对照试验。
Innov Aging. 2021 Aug 2;5(3):igab027. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab027. eCollection 2021.
5
Validation of a three-item Fatigue Severity Scale for patients with substance use disorder: a cohort study from Norway for the period 2016-2020.物质使用障碍患者三项疲劳严重程度量表的验证:一项来自挪威2016 - 2020年期间的队列研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 2;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01708-w.
6
Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale.简短智慧发展量表的编制及心理测量学特性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8):2717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082717.
社交媒体障碍量表的跨文化验证
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Aug 19;12:683-690. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S216788. eCollection 2019.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) with Chinese University Students.中文大学生 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(WEMWBS)的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Mar 14;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1113-1.
5
Sadder but wiser: Emotional reactions and wisdom in a simulated suicide intervention.更加悲伤但更明智:模拟自杀干预中的情绪反应和智慧。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Dec;54(6):791-799. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12536. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
6
Factor structure of the Geriatric Depression Scale and measurement invariance across gender among Chinese elders.老年抑郁量表的因子结构及在中老年人中跨性别测量不变性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.100. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Measuring Wisdom: Existing Approaches, Continuing Challenges, and New Developments.衡量智慧:现有方法、持续挑战与新发展。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Oct 10;73(8):1393-1403. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx140.
8
Reliability, concurrent validity, and cultural adaptation of the Geriatric Depression Scale and the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory for detecting depression and anxiety symptoms among older Chinese immigrants: an Australian study.老年抑郁量表和老年焦虑量表在检测老年华人群体抑郁和焦虑症状中的可靠性、同时效度和文化适应性:一项澳大利亚研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 May;30(5):735-748. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002332. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Thin-Slice Measurement of Wisdom.智慧的薄片测量
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 15;8:1378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01378. eCollection 2017.
10
Depression statuses and related predictors in later life: A 10-year follow-up study in Israel.晚年的抑郁状态及相关预测因素:以色列的一项10年随访研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2016 Jun 28;13(4):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0384-1. eCollection 2016 Dec.