Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982170 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-2170, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Apr;24(4):405-411. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02894-7.
To examine the extent to which communities participating in the Collective Impact Learning Collaborative (CILC) increased capacity to create conditions for collective impact (CI) to address racial disparities in maternal and child health (MCH) and align local efforts with state MCH priorities over a 12-month period.
Eight communities participated in a learning collaborative that involved the provision of technical assistance via webinars, monthly team calls, and site visits to facilitate the development of a collective impact initiative. A Ready-Set-Go approach to technical assistance was used to guide the communities through each phase of development while also providing individual assistance to teams based on their capacity at the start of participation.
A pre/post design measured change in capacity to engage in CI efforts over time. A survey designed to assess the completion of core tasks related to early indicators of CI was completed at baseline and 12 months later. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test and Mann-Whitney test determined statistically significant progress towards outcomes over 12 months and differences in progress between high- and low- capacity teams.
In 12 months, teams with little established groundwork made significant progress, in some ways exceeding progress of more established teams. Statistically significant progress was achieved in eleven of fourteen outcomes measured. Five teams aligned local efforts with state priorities after 12 months. Findings suggest technical assistance to establish conditions for collective impact can support progress even when pre-conditions for collective impact are not previously established.
考察参与集体影响学习合作(CILC)的社区在多大程度上增加了能力,以创造有利于集体影响(CI)的条件,从而解决母婴健康(MCH)方面的种族差异,并在 12 个月内使当地努力与州 MCH 优先事项保持一致。
八个社区参与了一个学习合作,通过网络研讨会、每月团队电话会议和现场访问提供技术援助,以促进集体影响倡议的发展。采用“准备就绪”的技术援助方法来指导社区逐步发展,同时根据团队在参与开始时的能力为团队提供个性化的帮助。
采用前后设计来衡量随着时间的推移,参与集体影响努力的能力变化。一项旨在评估与早期集体影响指标相关的核心任务完成情况的调查在基线和 12 个月后完成。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和曼-惠特尼检验确定了 12 个月内结果的统计学显著进展,以及高能力和低能力团队之间进展的差异。
在 12 个月内,基础工作较少的团队取得了重大进展,在某些方面超过了基础更扎实的团队的进展。在 14 个衡量结果中,有 11 个取得了统计学上的显著进展。五个团队在 12 个月后使当地努力与州优先事项保持一致。研究结果表明,为建立集体影响的条件提供技术援助可以支持进展,即使集体影响的前期条件以前没有建立。