Department of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Hygiene and Biostatistics, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Curr Microbiol. 2020 Jul;77(7):1159-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-01919-2. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
The efficacy of domestic laundering of healthcare staff clothing is still debated. This study aimed to compare the performance of decontamination of different domestic laundering with that of industrial laundering. Fourteen naturally contaminated white coats of healthcare workers (5 fabric squares from each coat) and fabric squares of artificially contaminated cotton cloth (30 fabric squares per each bacterial strain used) were included. Four domestic laundering procedures were performed; two different washing temperatures (40 °C and 90 °C) and drying (tumble dry and air dry) were used. All fabric squares were ironed. Presence of bacterial bioburden on the fabric squares after domestic and industrial laundering was investigated. None of the naturally contaminated fabric squares resulted completely decontaminated after any of the domestic washes. At 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation, bacterial growth was observed in all the laundered fabric squares. Besides environmental microorganisms, potentially pathogenic bacteria (i.e., Acinetobacter lwoffii, Micrococcus luteus, coagulase-negative staphylococci) were isolated. On the artificially contaminated fabric squares, the bioburden was reduced after the domestic laundries; nevertheless, both Gram-negative and -positive pathogenic bacteria were not completely removed. In addition, a contamination of the fabric squares by environmental Gram-negative bacteria was observed. In both the naturally and artificially contaminated fabric squares, no bacterial growth at all the time-points analyzed was observed after industrial laundering, which provided to be more effective in bacterial decontamination than domestic washes. For those areas requiring the highest level of decontamination, the use of specialized industrial laundry services should be preferred.
医护人员工作服的家庭洗涤效果仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较不同家庭洗涤程序与工业洗涤程序的去污效果。共纳入 14 件自然污染的医护人员白大衣(每件大衣取 5 块布片)和 30 块人工污染的棉织物布片(每种细菌菌株用 30 块布片)。进行了 4 种家庭洗涤程序;使用了两种不同的洗涤温度(40°C 和 90°C)和干燥方式(滚筒干燥和空气干燥)。所有布片均经过熨烫。对家庭和工业洗涤后布片上的细菌生物负荷进行了检测。没有任何一块自然污染的布片经过任何一种家庭洗涤后能完全被消毒。在 24、48 和 72 小时的孵育后,所有洗涤过的布片都观察到了细菌生长。除了环境微生物外,还分离出了潜在的病原菌(即洛菲不动杆菌、藤黄微球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌)。在人工污染的布片上,家庭洗涤后生物负荷减少;然而,革兰氏阴性和阳性的病原菌都没有被完全去除。此外,还观察到环境革兰氏阴性菌对布片的污染。在自然和人工污染的布片上,经过工业洗涤后,所有时间点都没有观察到细菌生长,这表明工业洗涤比家庭洗涤更能有效地进行细菌消毒。对于那些需要最高水平消毒的区域,应优先使用专业的工业洗衣服务。