George Janine, Waroquiers David, Di Stefano Davide, Petretto Guido, Rignanese Gian-Marco, Hautier Geoffroy
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Chemin des étoiles 8, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 May 4;59(19):7569-7575. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000829. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
The Pauling rules have been used for decades to rationalise the crystal structures of ionic compounds. Despite their importance, there has been no statistical assessment of the performances of these five empirical rules so far. Here, we rigorously and automatically test all five Pauling rules for a large data set of around 5000 known oxides. We discuss each Pauling rule separately, stressing their limits and range of application in terms of chemistries and structures. We conclude that only 13 % of the oxides simultaneously satisfy the last four rules, indicating a much lower predictive power than expected.
几十年来,鲍林规则一直被用于解释离子化合物的晶体结构。尽管它们很重要,但到目前为止,尚未对这五条经验规则的性能进行统计评估。在这里,我们对大约5000种已知氧化物的大数据集严格且自动地测试了所有五条鲍林规则。我们分别讨论每条鲍林规则,强调它们在化学和结构方面的局限性及应用范围。我们得出的结论是,只有13%的氧化物同时满足最后四条规则,这表明其预测能力比预期的要低得多。