BASF Grenzach GmbH, Grenzach-Whylen, Germany.
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2020 Apr;205:111818. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111818. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
The idea of increasing the performance of sunscreens without adding more UV-filters is very attractive. Early studies reported an influence of solvents on the absorbing properties of UV-absorbers which was shown to be connected to the solvent polarity. However, the polarity differed a lot between tested solvents and most were unsuitable UV-filter solubilizers. The aim of the present study was to focus exclusively on emollients pertinent for sunscreens and investigate their impact on the performance of UV-filter combinations. The UV absorbance of Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine, Ethylhexyl Triazone, Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate, and Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate was measured in suncare relevant emollients comprising C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Dibutyl Adipate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Coco-caprylate, Isopropyl Myristate, Dicaprylyl Carbonate. The wavelength of maximum absorbance (λmax) and specific extinction at λmax (E1,1 ) were assessed for each UV-filter - emollient system. The performance of market relevant UV-filter combinations based on the studied UV-filters was simulated for each emollient with a computational method using the absorbance values measured for each UV-filter - emollient system. The difference in polarity of emollients led to a 2-3 nm bathochromic shift and a variation of the E1,1 ranging from 4 to 20% for tested UV-filters. The emollient type showed nearly no influence on the sun protection factor (SPF) of market relevant UV-filter combinations probably due to a different influence an emollient shows on the UVB filters resulting in cancelling of the corresponding effect. Conversely, for all UV-filter combinations the UVA protection decreased with a decrease in the emollient polarity. Whilst the SPF was not impacted by standardly used cosmetic oils, the results advocate to use polar emollients to optimize the UVA protection. This is of advantage since polar emollients better dissolve crystalline UV-filters. From tested emollients, Dibutyl Adipate performed the best for both SPF and PPD factors.
提高防晒霜性能而不添加更多紫外线滤光剂的想法非常吸引人。早期的研究报告称,溶剂会影响紫外线吸收剂的吸收特性,这与溶剂极性有关。然而,测试溶剂的极性差异很大,而且大多数都不适合作为紫外线滤光剂的溶剂。本研究的目的是专门关注与防晒霜相关的润肤剂,并研究它们对紫外线滤光剂组合性能的影响。在防晒相关的润肤剂中测量了二乙基己基氧苯酚甲氧基二苯甲酰基三嗪、乙基己基三嗪、二乙基氨基羟基苯甲酰基己基苯甲酸酯和乙基己基甲氧基肉桂酸酯的紫外线吸收,这些润肤剂包括 C12-15 烷基苯甲酸酯、二丁基己二酸酯、辛酸/癸酸三甘油酯、椰油辛酸酯、异壬酸异壬酯和碳酸二辛酯。评估了每个紫外线滤光剂-润肤剂系统的最大吸收波长(λmax)和在 λmax 处的特定消光(E1,1)。使用吸收值为每个紫外线滤光剂-润肤剂系统测量的计算方法,模拟了基于研究紫外线滤光剂的市场相关紫外线滤光剂组合在每种润肤剂中的性能。由于测试的紫外线滤光剂的极性差异,导致 2-3nm 的红移,E1,1 的变化范围为 4%至 20%。由于润肤剂对紫外线 B 滤光剂的影响不同,导致相应的影响相互抵消,因此,润肤剂类型对市场相关紫外线滤光剂组合的防晒因子(SPF)几乎没有影响。相反,对于所有紫外线滤光剂组合,随着润肤剂极性的降低,UVA 保护作用降低。虽然 SPF 不受标准化妆品油的影响,但结果表明应使用极性润肤剂来优化 UVA 保护。这是有利的,因为极性润肤剂可以更好地溶解结晶紫外线滤光剂。在测试的润肤剂中,二丁基己二酸酯在 SPF 和 PPD 因子方面表现最佳。