Suppr超能文献

持续输注美罗培南在医院获得性肺炎重症患者中的肺内浓度:一项随机药代动力学试验。

Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial.

作者信息

Benítez-Cano Adela, Luque Sonia, Sorlí Luisa, Carazo Jesús, Ramos Isabel, Campillo Nuria, Curull Víctor, Sánchez-Font Albert, Vilaplana Carles, Horcajada Juan P, Adalia Ramón, Bermejo Silvia, Samsó Enric, Hope William, Grau Santiago

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2020 Feb 17;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2763-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal antimicrobial drug exposure in the lung is required for successful treatment outcomes for nosocomial pneumonia. Little is known about the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem when administered by continuous infusion (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the PK of two dosages of meropenem (3 g vs 6 g/day by CI) in the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients (81% male, median (IQR) age 72 (22) years) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Sixteen patients received 1 g/8 h and 15 2 g/8 h by CI (8 h infusion). Plasma and ELF meropenem concentrations were modeled using a population methodology, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of attaining (PTA) a free ELF concentration of 50% of time above MIC (50% fT>MIC), which results in logarithmic killing and the suppression of resistance in experimental models of pneumonia.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) of meropenem AUC in the plasma and ELF was 287.6 (190.2) and 84.1 (78.8) mg h/L in the 1 g/8 h group vs 448.1 (231.8) and 163.0 (201.8) mg h/L in the 2 g/8 h group, respectively. The penetration ratio was approximately 30% and was comparable between the dosage groups. In the Monte Carlo simulations, only the highest approved dose of meropenem of 2 g/8 h by CI allowed to achieve an optimal PTA for all isolates with a MIC < 4 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the dose of meropenem administered by CI achieved a higher exposure in the plasma and ELF. The use of the highest licensed dose of 6 g/day may be necessary to achieve an optimal coverage in ELF for all susceptible isolates (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L) in patients with conserved renal function. An alternative therapy should be considered when the presence of microorganisms with a MIC greater than 2 mg/L is suspected.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT-no. 2016-002796-10). Registered on 27 December 2016.

摘要

背景

医院获得性肺炎的成功治疗需要肺部达到最佳抗菌药物暴露水平。关于美罗培南持续输注(CI)时的肺内药代动力学(PK)情况,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在评估两种剂量的美罗培南(CI给药,3g/天 vs 6g/天)在医院获得性肺炎重症患者血浆和上皮衬液(ELF)中的PK。

方法

31例患者(81%为男性,年龄中位数(IQR)为72(22)岁)纳入一项前瞻性、随机临床试验。16例患者接受1g/8小时CI输注,15例接受2g/8小时CI输注(8小时输注)。采用群体方法对血浆和美罗培南ELF浓度进行建模,并进行蒙特卡洛模拟,以估计达到游离ELF浓度在50%的时间高于最低抑菌浓度(50% fT>MIC)的概率,这在肺炎实验模型中可导致对数杀灭并抑制耐药性。

结果

1g/8小时组血浆和美罗培南ELF的AUC中位数(IQR)分别为287.6(190.2)和84.1(78.8)mg·h/L,而2g/8小时组分别为448.1(231.8)和163.0(201.8)mg·h/L。渗透比约为30%,且在剂量组之间具有可比性。在蒙特卡洛模拟中,仅CI给药2g/8小时的美罗培南最高批准剂量能使所有MIC<4mg/L的分离株达到最佳PTA。

结论

CI给药的美罗培南剂量增加可使血浆和ELF中的暴露水平更高。对于肾功能正常的患者,使用6g/天的最高许可剂量可能有必要在ELF中实现对所有敏感分离株(MIC≤2mg/L)的最佳覆盖。当怀疑存在MIC大于2mg/L的微生物时,应考虑替代治疗。

试验注册

该试验在欧盟药品监管当局临床试验数据库(EudraCT编号:2016 - 002796 - 10)注册。于2016年12月27日注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验