Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, PO Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1287. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041287.
To assist interpretation of a study in rural Pakistan on the use of biomass for cooking and the risk of coronary heart disease, we continuously monitored airborne concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO) for up to 48 h in the kitchens of households randomly selected from the parent study. Satisfactory data on PM and CO respectively were obtained for 16 and 17 households using biomass, and 19 and 17 using natural gas. Linear regression analysis indicated that in comparison with kitchens using natural gas, daily average PM concentrations were substantially higher in kitchens that used biomass in either a chimney stove (mean difference 611, 95% CI: 359, 863 µg/m) or traditional three-stone stove (mean difference 389, 95% CI: 231, 548 µg/m). Daily average concentrations of CO were significantly increased when biomass was used in a traditional stove (mean difference from natural gas 3.7, 95% CI: 0.8, 6.7 ppm), but not when it was used in a chimney stove (mean difference -0.8, 95% CI: -4.8, 3.2 ppm). Any impact of smoking by household members was smaller than that of using biomass, and not clearly discernible. In the population studied, cooking with biomass as compared with natural gas should serve as a good proxy for higher personal exposure to PM.
为了协助解读在巴基斯坦农村进行的一项关于使用生物质燃料做饭与冠心病风险的研究,我们在这些家庭的厨房中连续监测了长达 48 小时的细颗粒物(PM)和一氧化碳(CO)的空气浓度,这些家庭是从母研究中随机选择的。使用生物质燃料的 16 户家庭和使用天然气的 17 户家庭分别获得了令人满意的 PM 和 CO 数据。线性回归分析表明,与使用天然气的厨房相比,使用柴火炉(平均差值为 611,95%置信区间:359,863μg/m)或传统三石炉(平均差值为 389,95%置信区间:231,548μg/m)做饭时,厨房中 PM 的日平均浓度要高得多。当使用传统炉灶燃烧生物质时,CO 的日平均浓度显著增加(与天然气相比差值为 3.7,95%置信区间:0.8,6.7ppm),而在使用柴火炉时则没有明显变化(差值为-0.8,95%置信区间:-4.8,3.2ppm)。家庭成员吸烟的任何影响都小于使用生物质燃料,而且不太明显。在研究人群中,与使用天然气相比,用生物质做饭可以很好地代表个人 PM 暴露水平的升高。