Medizinische Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence Hearing4All, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229088. eCollection 2020.
Low frequency noise (LFS) and infrasound (IS) are controversially discussed as potential causes of annoyance and distress experienced by many people. However, the perception mechanisms for IS in the human auditory system are not completely understood yet. In the present study, sinusoids at 32 Hz (at the lower limit of melodic pitch for tonal stimulation), as well as 8 Hz (IS range) were presented to a group of 20 normal hearing subjects, using monaural stimulation via a loudspeaker sound source coupled to the ear canal by a long silicone rubber tube. Each participant attended two experimental sessions. In the first session, participants performed a categorical loudness scaling procedure as well as an unpleasantness rating task in a sound booth. In the second session, the loudness scaling procedure was repeated while brain activation was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Subsequently, activation data were collected for the respective stimuli presented at fixed levels adjusted to the individual loudness judgments. Silent trials were included as a baseline condition. Our results indicate that the brain regions involved in processing LFS and IS are similar to those for sounds in the typical audio frequency range, i.e., mainly primary and secondary auditory cortex (AC). In spite of large variation across listeners with respect to judgments of loudness and unpleasantness, neural correlates of these interindividual differences could not yet be identified. Still, for individual listeners, fMRI activation in the AC was more closely related to individual perception than to the physical stimulus level.
低频噪声(LFS)和次声(IS)被认为是许多人感到烦恼和不适的潜在原因,但人类听觉系统对 IS 的感知机制尚未完全了解。在本研究中,使用通过长硅橡胶管耦合到耳道的扬声器声源进行单耳刺激,向一组 20 名正常听力受试者呈现 32 Hz(旋律音高的下限)和 8 Hz(IS 范围)的正弦波。每个参与者参加了两个实验会话。在第一个会话中,参与者在隔音室内进行了类别响度标度程序和不愉快度评分任务。在第二个会话中,在使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量大脑激活的同时重复了响度标度程序。随后,为在个体响度判断中调整到固定水平的相应刺激收集了激活数据。静音试验被包括作为基线条件。我们的结果表明,处理 LFS 和 IS 的大脑区域与典型音频范围内的声音相似,主要是初级和次级听觉皮层(AC)。尽管听众在响度和不愉快度判断方面存在很大差异,但这些个体差异的神经相关性尚无法确定。尽管如此,对于个体听众,AC 中的 fMRI 激活与个体感知比与物理刺激水平更密切相关。