Suppr超能文献

冻干血浆治疗大出血:系统综述。

Freeze-dried plasma in major haemorrhage: a systematic review.

机构信息

Herlev Anaesthesia Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2020 May;115(4):263-274. doi: 10.1111/vox.12898. Epub 2020 Feb 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Freeze-dried plasma (FDP) has logistical advantages in terms of storage and reconstitution time compared to fresh-frozen plasma. In vitro studies show FDP to be equivalent to fresh-frozen plasma regarding coagulation and clotting capacities. FDP is used in an increasing number of countries. We wanted to evaluate the clinical effects of FDP in major haemorrhage compared to standard care.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Central, Biosis Previews, WHO ICTRP, Clinical Trials and Open Grey were systematically searched from inception until September 2018, without language restriction. Studies were eligible if they examined haemorrhagic adult patients transfused with FDP. Our primary outcome was mortality. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed bias.

RESULTS

Nine studies were eligible for inclusion. Three studies had a comparison group: one was a randomized controlled trial and two were before and after comparisons. Six studies were uncontrolled. A total of 606 patients received FDP, while 72 patients received non-FDP transfusion. In total, five minor adverse effects were documented. Two studies compared FDP to fresh-frozen plasma and found no difference in 30-day mortality between the groups. The included studies were heterogenous and had several methodological weaknesses, such as no control group, missing data or no protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The available research does not document the clinical effects of FDP. We cannot recommend or discourage use of FDP in major haemorrhage on base of available research.

摘要

背景和目的

与新鲜冷冻血浆相比,冻干血浆(FDP)在储存和复溶时间方面具有后勤优势。体外研究表明,FDP 在凝血和凝血能力方面与新鲜冷冻血浆相当。FDP 在越来越多的国家得到应用。我们希望评估 FDP 在大出血中的临床效果与标准治疗相比。

方法

系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、Biosis Previews、世界卫生组织 ICTRP、临床试验和 Open Grey 从成立到 2018 年 9 月,无语言限制。如果研究检查了输注 FDP 的出血成年患者,则符合入选标准。我们的主要结局是死亡率。两名审查员独立评估研究的入选情况、提取数据和评估偏倚。

结果

共有 9 项研究符合纳入标准。其中 3 项研究有对照组:1 项为随机对照试验,2 项为前后对照。6 项研究为非对照研究。共 606 例患者接受 FDP 治疗,72 例患者接受非 FDP 输血。共有 5 例轻微不良事件。2 项研究将 FDP 与新鲜冷冻血浆进行了比较,发现两组 30 天死亡率无差异。纳入的研究存在异质性,存在多种方法学缺陷,如无对照组、数据缺失或无方案。

结论

现有研究未记录 FDP 的临床效果。我们不能根据现有研究推荐或不推荐 FDP 在大出血中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验