Virology, Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Wits RHI), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 25;17(2):e1003037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003037. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Uptake of antiretroviral treatment (ART) is expanding rapidly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Monitoring of virological suppression is recommended at 6 months of treatment and annually thereafter. In case of confirmed virological failure, a switch to second-line ART is indicated. There is a paucity of data on virological suppression and clinical management of patients experiencing viremia in clinical practice in LMIC. We report a large-scale multicenter assessment of virological suppression over time and management of viremia under programmatic conditions.
Linked medical record and laboratory source data from adult patients on first-line ART at 52 South African centers between 1 January 2007 and 1 May 2018 were studied. Virological suppression, switch to second-line ART, death, and loss to follow-up were analyzed. Multistate models and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess suppression over time and predictors of treatment outcomes. A total of 104,719 patients were included. Patients were predominantly female (67.6%). Median age was 35.7 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 29.9-43.0). In on-treatment analysis, suppression below 1,000 copies/mL was 89.0% at month 12 and 90.4% at month 72. Suppression below 50 copies/mL was 73.1% at month 12 and 77.5% at month 72. Intention-to-treat suppression was 75.0% and 64.3% below 1,000 and 50 copies/mL at month 72, respectively. Viremia occurred in 19.8% (20,766/104,719) of patients during a median follow-up of 152 (IQR: 61-265) weeks. Being male and below 35 years of age and having a CD4 count below 200 cells/μL prior to start of ART were risk factors for viremia. After detection of viremia, confirmatory testing took 29 weeks (IQR: 16-54). Viral resuppression to below 1,000 copies/mL without switch of ART occurred frequently (45.6%; 6,030/13,210) but was associated with renewed viral rebound and switch. Of patients with confirmed failure who remained in care, only 41.5% (1,872/4,510) were switched. The median time to switch was 68 weeks (IQR: 35-127), resulting in 12,325 person-years spent with a viral load above 1,000 copies/mL. Limitations of this study include potential missing data, which is in part addressed by the use of cross-matched laboratory source data, and the possibility of unmeasured confounding.
In this study, 90% virological suppression below the threshold of 1,000 copies/mL was observed in on-treatment analysis. However, this target was not met at the 50-copies/mL threshold or in intention-to-treat analysis. Clinical management in response to viremia was profoundly delayed, prolonging the duration of viremia and potential for transmission. Diagnostic tools to establish the cause of viremia are urgently needed to accelerate clinical decision-making.
在中低收入国家(LMIC),抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的使用率正在迅速提高。建议在治疗 6 个月时和此后每年监测病毒学抑制情况。如果确认病毒学失败,则应转为二线 ART。在 LMIC 的临床实践中,关于病毒学抑制和接受病毒血症患者的临床管理的数据很少。我们报告了一项大规模的多中心评估,以了解随着时间的推移病毒学抑制情况,以及在方案条件下病毒血症的管理情况。
研究了 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 5 月 1 日期间,52 个南非中心的一线 ART 成年患者的病历和实验室源数据。分析了病毒学抑制、转为二线 ART、死亡和失访。使用多状态模型和 Cox 比例风险模型来评估随时间的抑制情况和治疗结果的预测因素。共纳入 104719 名患者。患者主要为女性(67.6%)。中位年龄为 35.7 岁(四分位距[IQR]:29.9-43.0)。在治疗中分析中,第 12 个月时,抑制率低于 1000 拷贝/ml 的比例为 89.0%,第 72 个月时为 90.4%。第 12 个月时,抑制率低于 50 拷贝/ml 的比例为 73.1%,第 72 个月时为 77.5%。意向治疗抑制率在第 72 个月时分别为 75.0%和 64.3%,低于 1000 拷贝/ml 和 50 拷贝/ml。在中位随访 152(IQR:61-265)周期间,19.8%(20766/104719)的患者发生病毒血症。男性、年龄小于 35 岁和开始 ART 前 CD4 计数低于 200 个/μl 是发生病毒血症的危险因素。在检测到病毒血症后,确认检测需要 29 周(IQR:16-54)。经常发生病毒重新抑制至低于 1000 拷贝/ml 而无需转换 ART(45.6%;6030/13210),但与再次病毒反弹和转换相关。在确认失败且仍在接受治疗的患者中,只有 41.5%(1872/4510)转换。转换的中位时间为 68 周(IQR:35-127),导致 12325 人年的病毒载量高于 1000 拷贝/ml。本研究的局限性包括潜在的缺失数据,这在一定程度上通过使用交叉匹配的实验室源数据来解决,以及存在无法衡量的混杂因素的可能性。
在本研究中,在治疗中分析时,观察到 90%的病毒学抑制率低于 1000 拷贝/ml 的阈值。然而,在 50 拷贝/ml 的阈值或意向治疗分析中并没有达到这个目标。对病毒血症的临床管理严重滞后,延长了病毒血症的持续时间和潜在的传播风险。迫切需要诊断工具来确定病毒血症的原因,以加速临床决策。