• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描容积测量与新辅助化疗治疗进展期胃癌预后的相关性

The Correlation Between Computed Tomography Volumetry and Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

作者信息

Chen Chao, Dong Hao, Shou Chunhui, Shi Xiaoxiao, Zhang Qing, Liu Xiaosun, Zhu Kankai, Zhong Baishu, Yu Jiren

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 3;12:759-768. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S231636. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S231636
PMID:32099471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006857/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and utility of computer tomography (CT) volumetry in evaluating the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventeen Patients with AGC who received NAC followed by R0 resection between January 2006 and December 2012 were included. Tumor volumes were quantified using OsiriX software. The volume reduction rate (VRR) was calculated as follows: VRR = [(pre-chemotherapy total volume) - (post-chemotherapy total volume)]/(pre-chemotherapy total volume) × 100%. The optimal cut-off VRR for differentiating favorable from unfavorable prognosis was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and values were compared using the Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was determined by the Cox proportional regression model.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off VRR was 31.95% according to ROC analysis, with a sensitivity of 70.4% and a specificity of 71.7%. Based on the cut-off VRR, patients were divided into the VRR-High (VRR ≥ 31.95%, n = 63) and VRR-Low (VRR < 31.95%, n = 54) groups. The VRR-Low group exhibited a worse prognosis than that of the VRR-High group (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.69-4.82, P < 0.001), with 3-year survival rates of 40.7% and 79.4%, and 5-year survival rates of 31.5% and 63.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CT volumetry is a feasible and reliable method for assessing the tumor response to NAC in patients with AGC.

摘要

目的

探讨计算机断层扫描(CT)容积测量法在评估晚期胃癌(AGC)患者新辅助化疗(NAC)疗效方面的可行性和实用性。

患者与方法

纳入2006年1月至2012年12月期间接受NAC并随后进行R0切除的117例AGC患者。使用OsiriX软件对肿瘤体积进行量化。体积缩小率(VRR)计算如下:VRR = [(化疗前总体积)-(化疗后总体积)]/(化疗前总体积)×100%。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定区分预后良好与不良的最佳临界VRR。采用Kaplan-Meier分析计算总生存期,并使用对数秩检验比较数值。通过Cox比例回归模型进行多因素分析。

结果

根据ROC分析,最佳临界VRR为31.95%,敏感性为70.4%,特异性为71.7%。基于临界VRR,患者被分为VRR高组(VRR≥31.95%,n = 63)和VRR低组(VRR < 31.95%,n = 54)。VRR低组的预后比VRR高组差(HR,2.85;95%CI,1.69 - 4.82,P < 0.001),3年生存率分别为40.7%和79.4%,5年生存率分别为31.5%和63.5%。

结论

CT容积测量法是评估AGC患者对NAC疗效的一种可行且可靠的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/12c35252ad32/CMAR-12-759-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/847386565a59/CMAR-12-759-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/5be7e6a60754/CMAR-12-759-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/8a9599b85c8a/CMAR-12-759-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/12c35252ad32/CMAR-12-759-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/847386565a59/CMAR-12-759-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/5be7e6a60754/CMAR-12-759-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/8a9599b85c8a/CMAR-12-759-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f5/7006857/12c35252ad32/CMAR-12-759-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Correlation Between Computed Tomography Volumetry and Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.计算机断层扫描容积测量与新辅助化疗治疗进展期胃癌预后的相关性
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Feb 3;12:759-768. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S231636. eCollection 2020.
2
Usefulness of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.CT容积测量法对原发性胃病变在预测晚期胃癌新辅助化疗病理反应中的应用价值。
Abdom Imaging. 2009 Jul;34(4):430-40. doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9420-8.
3
Can low-dose CT perfusion imaging accurately assess response of advanced gastric cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy?低剂量 CT 灌注成像能否准确评估新辅助化疗后晚期胃癌的疗效?
J Xray Sci Technol. 2017;25(6):981-991. doi: 10.3233/XST-17271.
4
F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Metabolic Parameters Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Predict the Postoperative Prognosis of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描代谢参数在新辅助化疗前后可预测局部晚期胃癌的术后预后。
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021 Oct;36(8):662-671. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2020.3942. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Utility of MRI and PET/CT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: correlation with pathological response grading system based on tumor cellularity.新辅助化疗后MRI和PET/CT在乳腺癌患者中的应用:与基于肿瘤细胞密度的病理反应分级系统的相关性
Acta Radiol. 2014 May;55(4):399-408. doi: 10.1177/0284185113498720. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
6
Ki-67 as a controversial predictive and prognostic marker in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Ki-67作为新辅助化疗治疗的乳腺癌患者中一个存在争议的预测和预后标志物。
Diagn Pathol. 2017 Feb 21;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13000-017-0608-5.
7
[Value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound QontraXt three-dimensional pseudocolor quantitative analysis to therapeutic effect evaluation of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients].[双对比增强超声QontraXt三维伪彩色定量分析对进展期胃癌患者术前新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 23;40(11):857-863. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.11.012.
8
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.对比增强超声造影评估胃癌新辅助化疗的反应。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 21;18(47):7026-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.7026.
9
[Prognostic analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with propensity score matching method].[应用倾向评分匹配法对局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗的预后分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 25;21(10):1148-1153.
10
[Safety and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and S-1 for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after D2 lymph nodes dissection].奥沙利铂联合S-1辅助化疗用于D2淋巴结清扫术后局部进展期胃癌患者的安全性和疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 25;24(2):145-152. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20201016-00561.

引用本文的文献

1
Discordance in tumour response assessment for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using different methods.使用不同方法对胃癌新辅助化疗后的肿瘤反应评估存在不一致性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05187-1.
2
Concurrent clinical and pathological response predicts favorable prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a real-world study.新辅助治疗后胃癌患者临床与病理同步缓解预测预后良好:一项真实世界研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):996. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11508-8.
3
Imaging advances in efficacy assessment of gastric cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Gastric cancer and imaging biomarkers: Part 1 - a critical review of DW-MRI and CE-MDCT findings.胃癌与影像学标志物:第一部分——弥散加权 MRI 和 CE-MDCT 研究结果的批判性综述。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1743-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5732-4. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
2
Radiomics signature of computed tomography imaging for prediction of survival and chemotherapeutic benefits in gastric cancer.基于 CT 影像的放射组学特征预测胃癌患者生存及化疗获益
EBioMedicine. 2018 Oct;36:171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
CT volumetry can potentially predict the local stage for gastric cancer after chemotherapy.
胃癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的影像学进展。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Dec;48(12):3661-3676. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04046-1. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
CT容积测量法有可能预测胃癌化疗后的局部分期。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;23(4):257-262. doi: 10.5152/dir.2017.16517.
4
Predictors of overall and recurrence-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Pooled analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).胃食管腺癌新辅助化疗后总生存和无复发生存的预测因素:来自随机对照试验(RCT)的个体患者数据(IPD)汇总分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1550-1558. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial.新辅助多西他赛、奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙与表柔比星、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨用于可切除胃或胃食管交界处腺癌患者(FLOT4-AIO):多中心、开放标签、随机 2/3 期临床试验 2 期部分的结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1697-1708. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30531-9. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
6
Tumor volume of resectable gastric adenocarcinoma on multidetector computed tomography: association with N categories.多排螺旋计算机断层扫描下可切除胃腺癌的肿瘤体积:与N分期的相关性
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 Apr;71(4):199-204. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(04)04.
7
Evaluating the response of gastric carcinomas to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using iodine concentration on spectral CT: a comparison with pathological regression.利用光谱CT上的碘浓度评估胃癌对新辅助化疗的反应:与病理退缩的比较。
Clin Radiol. 2015 Nov;70(11):1198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.083. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Tumor volume reduction rate is superior to RECIST for predicting the pathological response of rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Results from a prospective study.在预测新辅助放化疗治疗直肠癌的病理反应方面,肿瘤体积缩小率优于实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST):一项前瞻性研究的结果
Oncol Lett. 2015 Jun;9(6):2680-2686. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3101. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
9
Change in volume parameters induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide accurate prediction of overall survival after resection in patients with oesophageal cancer.新辅助化疗诱导的体积参数变化可准确预测食管癌患者切除术后的总生存。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):311-21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3860-7. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
10
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.