PGIMER, Nursing, Chandigarh, India.
National Institute of Nursing Education, Chandigarh, India.
Alcohol Alcohol. 2020 Apr 16;55(3):284-290. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa014.
To determine the effectiveness of individual-based, nurse-delivered, on-campus screening and brief intervention (SBI) for hazardous alcohol use among college students.
It was a parallel-design, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Out of 793 students screened, 130 met the selection criteria of hazardous alcohol use, defined by alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT) score 8-19. Participants were randomly allocated to either SBI or general advice group. Both interventions were delivered by one specially trained nurse. Outcome was assessed after 3 months. Primary outcome was the change in the mean AUDIT score and the secondary outcome was difference in the proportion of students transited from the high- to low-risk category of AUDIT. General linear model with repeated measures and logistic regression were used to determine the primary and secondary outcome, respectively.
Majority (80.7%) of the participants were men. Among all the baseline demography and clinical characteristics, only family history of alcohol use was significantly different in the groups. Intention to treat analysis showed a significant but small effect (0.16) of SBI on the mean AUDIT score. Gender did not moderate the effect. SBI was also observed to have a significant effect (adjusted odds ratio 3.7 95% CI 1.529-8.850) on shifting the students from high- to low-risk AUDIT zone.
SBI among college students is acceptable and has a small but significant effect on alcohol use. In countries like India, where despite the increasing magnitude of hazardous drinking in students no formal system exists to deal with the problem, SBI might be useful.
评估针对大学生危险饮酒问题的以个体为基础、由护士实施、在校园内开展的筛查和简短干预(SBI)的效果。
这是一项平行设计、双盲、随机对照试验。在筛查的 793 名学生中,有 130 名符合危险饮酒的选择标准,定义为酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)得分为 8-19 分。参与者被随机分配到 SBI 或一般建议组。两种干预措施均由一名专门培训的护士提供。在 3 个月后评估结果。主要结果是 AUDIT 评分均值的变化,次要结果是 AUDIT 评分从高风险类别过渡到低风险类别的学生比例的差异。使用重复测量的一般线性模型和逻辑回归分别确定主要和次要结果。
大多数(80.7%)参与者为男性。在所有基线人口统计学和临床特征中,只有饮酒的家族史在组间存在显著差异。意向治疗分析显示 SBI 对 AUDIT 评分均值的影响具有显著但较小的效果(0.16)。性别未调节这种效果。SBI 还观察到对将学生从高风险 AUDIT 区转移到低风险区具有显著效果(调整后的优势比 3.7,95%置信区间 1.529-8.850)。
针对大学生的 SBI 是可以接受的,并且对饮酒行为有较小但显著的影响。在印度等国家,尽管学生中危险饮酒的程度不断增加,但没有正式的系统来解决这个问题,因此 SBI 可能是有用的。