Suppr超能文献

思维如何伤人:哀悼调整过程中的反刍、担忧和回避。

How thinking hurts: Rumination, worry, and avoidance processes in adjustment to bereavement.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jul;27(4):548-558. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2440. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

Abstract

Repetitive negative thought plays an important role in the maintenance of mental health problems following bereavement. To date, bereavement researchers have primarily focused on rumination (i.e., repetitive thought about negative events and/or negative emotions), yet the interest in worry (i.e., repetitive thought about uncertain future events) is increasing. Both cognitive processes potentially lead to poorer adaptation to bereavement by contributing to loss-related avoidance and behavioural avoidance of activities. The current study aims to establish the differential associations of rumination and worry with symptoms of depression and prolonged grief and clarify if avoidance processes mediate the associations of rumination and worry with symptom levels. Four hundred seventy-four recently bereaved adults (82% female) filled out questionnaires assessing rumination, worry, loss-related and behavioural avoidance, and depression and prolonged grief symptoms. Rumination and worry were both uniquely associated with depression and prolonged grief symptoms. Compared with worry, rumination related more strongly to prolonged grief symptoms, whereas correlations of both cognitive styles with depression symptoms did not differ. Loss-related avoidance and behavioural avoidance partially mediated the associations of rumination and worry with prolonged grief symptoms. Behavioural avoidance partially mediated the associations of rumination and worry with depression symptoms. Findings suggest that exposure and behavioural activation may be effective interventions to reduce repetitive thinking and psychopathology after bereavement.

摘要

重复消极思维在丧亲后心理健康问题的维持中起着重要作用。迄今为止,丧亲研究人员主要关注的是反刍思维(即对消极事件和/或消极情绪的反复思考),但对担忧(即对未来不确定事件的反复思考)的兴趣正在增加。这两种认知过程都可能通过导致与丧失相关的回避和对活动的行为回避,导致对丧亲的适应不良。本研究旨在确定反刍和担忧与抑郁和延长哀伤症状的差异关联,并澄清回避过程是否调节反刍和担忧与症状水平的关联。474 名最近丧亲的成年人(82%为女性)填写了评估反刍、担忧、与丧失相关的回避和行为回避以及抑郁和延长哀伤症状的问卷。反刍和担忧都与抑郁和延长哀伤症状有独特的关联。与担忧相比,反刍与延长哀伤症状的关联更强,而这两种认知方式与抑郁症状的相关性则没有差异。与丧失相关的回避和行为回避部分中介了反刍和担忧与延长哀伤症状的关联。行为回避部分中介了反刍和担忧与抑郁症状的关联。研究结果表明,暴露和行为激活可能是减少丧亲后重复思维和心理病理学的有效干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba3f/7497101/30e10f77bdc3/CPP-27-548-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验