Suppr超能文献

机械通气患者 ICU 获得性肌无力的血浆 GDF-15 对诊断和预后评估的效用:前瞻性观察研究。

Utility of Plasma GDF-15 for Diagnosis and Prognosis Assessment of ICU-Acquired Weakness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Prospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang City, Lianyungang, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Lianyungang Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang City, Lianyungang, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 11;2020:3630568. doi: 10.1155/2020/3630568. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the clinical correlations between plasma growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), skeletal muscle function, and acute muscle wasting in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation. In addition, to investigate its diagnostic value for ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and its predictive value for 90-day survival in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

95 patients with acute respiratory failure, who required mechanical ventilation therapy, were randomly selected among hospitalized patients from June 2017 to January 2019. The plasma GDF-15 level was detected by ELISA, the rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RFcsa) was measured by ultrasound, and the patient's muscle strength was assessed using the British Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength score on day 1, day 4, and day 7. Patients were divided into an ICU-AW group and a non-ICU-AW group according to their MRC-score on the 7th day. The differences in plasma GDF-15 level, MRC-score, and RFcsa between the two groups were compared on the 1st, 4th, and 7th day after being admitted to the ICU. Then, the correlations between plasma GDF-15 level, RFcsa loss, and MRC-score on day 7 were investigated. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the plasma GDF-15 level, RFcsa loss, and % decrease in RFcsa on the 7th day to the diagnosis of ICU-AW in mechanically ventilated patients. Moreover, the predictive value of GDF-15 on the 90-day survival status of patients was assessed using patient survival curves.

RESULTS

Based on whether the 7th day MRC-score was <48, 50 cases were included in the ICU-AW group and 45 cases in the non-ICU-AW group. The length of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay were significantly longer in the ICU-AW group than in the non-ICU-AW group (all < 0.05), while the other baseline indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups. As the treatment time increased, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly increased, the ICU-AW group demonstrated a significant decreasing trend in the MRC-score and RFcsa, while no significant changes were found in the non-ICU-AW group. In the ICU-AW group, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly higher than that in the non-ICU-AW group, while the RFcsa and the MRC-score were significantly lower than those in the non-ICU-AW group (GDF-15 (pg/ml): 2542.44 ± 629.38 vs. 1542.86 ± 502.86; RFcsa (cm): 2.04 ± 0.64 vs. 2.34 ± 0.61; MRC-score: 41.22 ± 3.42 vs. 51.42 ± 2.72, all < 0.05), while the other baseline indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups. As the treatment time increased, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly increased, the ICU-AW group demonstrated a significant decreasing trend in the MRC-score and RFcsa, while no significant changes were found in the non-ICU-AW group. In the ICU-AW group, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly higher than that in the non-ICU-AW group, while the RFcsa and the MRC-score were significantly lower than those in the non-ICU-AW group (GDF-15 (pg/ml): 2542.44 ± 629.38 vs. 1542.86 ± 502.86; RFcsa (cm): 2.04 ± 0.64 vs. 2.34 ± 0.61; MRC-score: 41.22 ± 3.42 vs. 51.42 ± 2.72, all  = -0.60), while it was significantly positively correlated with the RFcsa loss ( = -0.60), while it was significantly positively correlated with the RFcsa loss ( = -0.60), while it was significantly positively correlated with the RFcsa loss ( = -0.60), while it was significantly positively correlated with the RFcsa loss ( < 0.05), while the other baseline indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups. As the treatment time increased, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly increased, the ICU-AW group demonstrated a significant decreasing trend in the MRC-score and RFcsa, while no significant changes were found in the non-ICU-AW group. In the ICU-AW group, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly higher than that in the non-ICU-AW group, while the RFcsa and the MRC-score were significantly lower than those in the non-ICU-AW group (GDF-15 (pg/ml): 2542.44 ± 629.38 vs. 1542.86 ± 502.86; RFcsa (cm): 2.04 ± 0.64 vs. 2.34 ± 0.61; MRC-score: 41.22 ± 3.42 vs. 51.42 ± 2.72, all < 0.05), while the other baseline indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups. As the treatment time increased, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly increased, the ICU-AW group demonstrated a significant decreasing trend in the MRC-score and RFcsa, while no significant changes were found in the non-ICU-AW group. In the ICU-AW group, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly higher than that in the non-ICU-AW group, while the RFcsa and the MRC-score were significantly lower than those in the non-ICU-AW group (GDF-15 (pg/ml): 2542.44 ± 629.38 vs. 1542.86 ± 502.86; RFcsa (cm): 2.04 ± 0.64 vs. 2.34 ± 0.61; MRC-score: 41.22 ± 3.42 vs. 51.42 ± 2.72, all < 0.05), while the other baseline indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups. As the treatment time increased, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly increased, the ICU-AW group demonstrated a significant decreasing trend in the MRC-score and RFcsa, while no significant changes were found in the non-ICU-AW group. In the ICU-AW group, the plasma GDF-15 level was significantly higher than that in the non-ICU-AW group, while the RFcsa and the MRC-score were significantly lower than those in the non-ICU-AW group (GDF-15 (pg/ml): 2542.44 ± 629.38 vs. 1542.86 ± 502.86; RFcsa (cm): 2.04 ± 0.64 vs. 2.34 ± 0.61; MRC-score: 41.22 ± 3.42 vs. 51.42 ± 2.72, all.

CONCLUSION

The plasma GDF-15 concentration level was significantly associated with skeletal muscle function and muscle wasting on day 7 in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the plasma GDF-15 level on the 7th day has a high diagnostic yield for ICU-acquired muscle weakness, and it can predict the 90-day survival status of ICU mechanically ventilated patients.

摘要

目的

确定生长分化因子 15(GDF-15)的血浆浓度与机械通气 ICU 患者的骨骼肌功能和急性肌肉消耗之间的临床相关性。此外,探讨其对 ICU 获得性肌无力(ICU-AW)的诊断价值及其对机械通气患者 90 天生存率的预测价值。

方法

本研究纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2019 年 1 月期间因急性呼吸衰竭而需要机械通气治疗的住院患者,共 95 例。通过酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血浆 GDF-15 水平,使用超声测量股直肌横截面积(RFcsa),并在入院第 1、4 和 7 天使用英国医学研究委员会(MRC)肌肉力量评分评估患者的肌肉力量。根据第 7 天的 MRC 评分,将患者分为 ICU-AW 组和非 ICU-AW 组。比较两组患者入院第 1、4 和 7 天的血浆 GDF-15 水平、MRC 评分和 RFcsa 变化。分析第 7 天血浆 GDF-15 水平、RFcsa 丢失和 MRC 评分之间的相关性。通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析第 7 天血浆 GDF-15 水平、RFcsa 丢失率和 RFcsa 降低百分比对机械通气患者 ICU-AW 的诊断价值。此外,通过患者生存曲线评估 GDF-15 对患者 90 天生存状况的预测价值。

结果

根据第 7 天 MRC 评分是否<48,将 50 例患者纳入 ICU-AW 组,45 例患者纳入非 ICU-AW 组。ICU-AW 组的机械通气时间、ICU 住院时间和住院时间均显著长于非 ICU-AW 组(均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在 ICU-AW 组中,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著高于非 ICU-AW 组,而 RFcsa 和 MRC 评分则显著低于非 ICU-AW 组(GDF-15(pg/ml):2542.44±629.38 比 1542.86±502.86;RFcsa(cm):2.04±0.64 比 2.34±0.61;MRC 评分:41.22±3.42 比 51.42±2.72,均<0.05),而两组的其他基线指标差异无统计学意义。随着治疗时间的延长,血浆 GDF-15 水平显著升高,ICU-AW 组的 MRC 评分和 RFcsa 呈显著下降趋势,而非 ICU-AW 组则无明显变化。在

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee56/7036092/41209b1048de/BMRI2020-3630568.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验