• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神科谵妄误诊风险:机器学习-逻辑回归预测算法。

Delirium misdiagnosis risk in psychiatry: a machine learning-logistic regression predictive algorithm.

机构信息

Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre (MAPRc), Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5005-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-5005-1
PMID:32106845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a frequent diagnosis made by Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry (CLP). Numerous studies have demonstrated misdiagnosis prior to referral to CLP. Few studies have considered the factors underlying misdiagnosis using multivariate approaches.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the number of cases referred to CLP, which are misdiagnosed at time of referral, to build an accurate predictive classifier algorithm, using input variables related to delirium misdiagnosis.

METHOD

A retrospective observational study was conducted at Alfred Hospital in Melbourne, collecting data from a record of all patients seen by CLP for a period of 5 months. Data was collected pertaining to putative factors underlying misdiagnosis. A Machine Learning-Logistic Regression classifier model was built, to classify cases of accurate delirium diagnosis vs. misdiagnosis.

RESULTS

Thirty five of 74 new cases referred were misdiagnosed. The proposed predictive algorithm achieved a mean Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area under the curve (AUC) of 79%, an average 72% classification accuracy, 77% sensitivity and 67% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Delirium is commonly misdiagnosed in hospital settings. Our findings support the potential application of Machine Leaning-logistic predictive classifier in health care settings.

摘要

背景

谵妄是联络精神病学(CLP)经常做出的诊断。许多研究表明,在转介到 CLP 之前存在误诊。很少有研究使用多元方法考虑导致误诊的因素。

目的

确定转介到 CLP 的病例数量,这些病例在转介时被误诊,以使用与谵妄误诊相关的输入变量构建准确的预测分类器算法。

方法

在墨尔本的阿尔弗雷德医院进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,收集了 CLP 为 5 个月期间就诊的所有患者的记录数据。收集了与误诊有关的潜在因素的数据。建立了机器学习-逻辑回归分类器模型,以对准确的谵妄诊断与误诊病例进行分类。

结果

74 例新转介病例中有 35 例被误诊。该预测算法的平均受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 79%,平均分类准确率为 72%,灵敏度为 77%,特异性为 67%。

结论

谵妄在医院环境中经常被误诊。我们的研究结果支持机器学习-逻辑预测分类器在医疗保健环境中的潜在应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c358/7045404/26d222b7d50a/12913_2020_5005_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c358/7045404/26d222b7d50a/12913_2020_5005_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c358/7045404/26d222b7d50a/12913_2020_5005_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Delirium misdiagnosis risk in psychiatry: a machine learning-logistic regression predictive algorithm.精神科谵妄误诊风险:机器学习-逻辑回归预测算法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5005-1.
2
Postoperative delirium prediction using machine learning models and preoperative electronic health record data.基于机器学习模型和术前电子健康记录数据预测术后谵妄。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01543-y.
3
Machine Learning to Develop and Internally Validate a Predictive Model for Post-operative Delirium in a Prospective, Observational Clinical Cohort Study of Older Surgical Patients.机器学习在老年手术患者前瞻性观察队列研究中开发和内部验证术后谵妄预测模型。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06238-7. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
Predicting postoperative delirium after microvascular decompression surgery with machine learning.利用机器学习预测微血管减压术后谵妄
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Nov;66:109896. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109896. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
Prediction of Incident Delirium Using a Random Forest classifier.使用随机森林分类器预测发生谵妄。
J Med Syst. 2018 Nov 14;42(12):261. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1109-0.
6
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Estimate Delirium Risk in Newly Hospitalized Patients Without Known Cognitive Impairment.基于电子病历的机器学习模型开发与验证:用于预测无已知认知障碍的新入院患者发生谵妄的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1018.
7
Predicting hospitalization following psychiatric crisis care using machine learning.运用机器学习预测精神科危机护理后的住院情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01361-1.
8
A Cross-Sectional, Retrospective, and Comparative Study between Delirium and Non-Delirium Psychiatric Disorders in a Psychogeriatric Inpatient Population Referred to Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Unit.一项针对转诊至联络会诊精神病学单元的老年精神病住院患者中谵妄与非谵妄性精神障碍的横断面、回顾性、比较研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 31;59(4):693. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040693.
9
Misidentification of mental health symptoms in presence of organic diseases and delirium during psychiatric liaison consulting.精神科联络会诊中器质性疾病和谵妄时精神卫生症状的误诊。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;21(3):215-220. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1301483. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
Risk prediction of delirium in hospitalized patients using machine learning: An implementation and prospective evaluation study.使用机器学习预测住院患者谵妄的风险:一项实施和前瞻性评估研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(9):1383-1392. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa113.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of risk factors for subjective stress among nurses caring for patients with delirium: a cross-sectional, multicentre survey.谵妄患者护理护士主观压力的危险因素分析:一项横断面多中心调查
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 17;24(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03568-x.
2
Exploring supportive care needs of lung cancer patients in China and predicting with machine learning models.探索中国肺癌患者的支持性护理需求并使用机器学习模型进行预测。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 13;33(7):573. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09619-y.
3
Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for validation of the 4AT, a rapid screening tool for delirium: a multicentre prospective diagnostic test accuracy study.4AT谵妄快速筛查工具验证方案:一项多中心前瞻性诊断试验准确性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e015572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015572.
2
Acute Brain Failure: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Sequelae of Delirium.急性脑功能衰竭:谵妄的病理生理学、诊断、管理及后遗症
Crit Care Clin. 2017 Jul;33(3):461-519. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2017.03.013.
3
Misidentification of mental health symptoms in presence of organic diseases and delirium during psychiatric liaison consulting.
自然语言处理方法评估诊断错误及安全学习系统病例回顾数据分析:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 26;26:e50935. doi: 10.2196/50935.
4
Delirium in psychiatric settings: risk factors and assessment tools in patients with psychiatric illness: a scoping review.精神科环境中的谵妄:精神疾病患者的危险因素及评估工具:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 8;23(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02121-6.
5
Novel opportunities for clinical pharmacy research: development of a machine learning model to identify medication related causes of delirium in different patient groups.临床药学研究的新机遇:开发一种机器学习模型,以识别不同患者群体中与药物相关的谵妄原因。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Aug;46(4):992-995. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01707-z. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
Drug Treatment for Patients with Postoperative Delirium and Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study of a Nationwide Hospital Claims Database.日本术后谵妄患者的药物治疗及会诊-联络精神病学:一项基于全国医院索赔数据库的回顾性观察研究
Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 1;3(4):116-126. doi: 10.37737/ace.3.4_116. eCollection 2021.
7
Cognitive Computing-Based CDSS in Medical Practice.医学实践中基于认知计算的临床决策支持系统
Health Data Sci. 2021 Jul 22;2021:9819851. doi: 10.34133/2021/9819851. eCollection 2021.
8
Identification and information management of cognitive impairment of patients in acute care hospitals: An integrative review.急症医院患者认知障碍的识别与信息管理:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2023 Dec 1;11(1):120-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.11.001. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Delirium pathophysiology in cancer: neurofilament light chain biomarker - narrative review.癌症中的谵妄病理生理学:神经丝轻链生物标志物——叙述性综述
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 30;15(3):319-325. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004781.
10
A lung cancer risk warning model based on tongue images.一种基于舌象的肺癌风险预警模型。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jun 1;14:1154294. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1154294. eCollection 2023.
精神科联络会诊中器质性疾病和谵妄时精神卫生症状的误诊。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;21(3):215-220. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1301483. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
4
The frequency of missed delirium in patients referred to palliative care in a comprehensive cancer center.在一家综合癌症中心接受姑息治疗的患者中,谵妄漏诊的发生率。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Aug;23(8):2427-33. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2610-3. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
5
Consultation-liaison service in a regional hospital in Hong Kong.香港一家地区医院的会诊-联络服务。
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;24(2):51-7.
6
Validation of the 4AT, a new instrument for rapid delirium screening: a study in 234 hospitalised older people.新型谵妄快速筛查工具4AT的验证:对234名住院老年人的研究
Age Ageing. 2014 Jul;43(4):496-502. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu021. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
7
Developing a strategy to identify and treat older patients with postoperative delirium.制定一项识别和治疗老年术后谵妄患者的策略。
AORN J. 2014 Feb;99(2):257-73; quiz 274-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.12.009.
8
Geriatric psychiatry review: differential diagnosis and treatment of the 3 D's - delirium, dementia, and depression.老年精神病学综述:3D 的鉴别诊断和治疗——谵妄、痴呆和抑郁。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Jun;15(6):365. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0365-4.
9
"What's in a name?" Delirium by any other name would be as deadly. A review of the nature of delirium consultations.“名字有什么意义?”即便换个名字,谵妄依然致命。谵妄会诊性质综述。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2012 Nov;18(6):413-8. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000422739.49377.17.
10
Change in accuracy of recognizing psychiatric disorders by non-psychiatric physicians: five-year data from a psychiatric consultation-liaison service.非精神科医师识别精神障碍准确性的变化:精神科会诊联络服务五年数据。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Dec;65(7):618-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02272.x.