Department of Sport Didactics, Faculty of Sports, University School of Physical Education in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education, University School of Physical Education in Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):138-148. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The aims of the research were to (1) determine the values of kinematic parameters in two modifications of the topspin forehand stroke as well as the differences between them and (2) assess the inter-individual and intra-individual variability of the values. Two modifications of a topspin forehand were evaluated: topspin after a topspin ball (TF1) and topspin after a backspin ball (TF2). The MyoMotion Noraxon analysis system was used to record the kinematic data. A piezo-electric sensor was used to identify the moment when the ball made contact with the racket. The coefficient of variation determined the variability of the kinematic parameters. Most of the joint angles in four identified events reflected how the individual segments of a player's body should move. The difference in acceleration at the moment of contact between the two types of the topspin forehand was significant, but the variability of the acceleration values was small. Large variability in the angular parameters was found, and this result was considered a manifestation of different coordination patterns in the stroke movements. It is possible that even though the players used different methods of performing the movement, they obtained similar values for some parameters (e.g., acceleration), which should be taken into account by coaches. There were small differences in many parameters within individual players, which can indicate that a player performs tasks in a similar way each time. However, there was high variability in some angular parameters, indicating that the repetitions of particular strokes were not performed in an identical way. The reasons for this phenomenon include movement functionality and functional variability.
(1)确定正手上旋两种变体的运动学参数值及其之间的差异;(2)评估这些值的个体内和个体间变异性。评估了两种正手上旋变体:上旋接上旋球(TF1)和上旋接下旋球(TF2)。MyoMotion Noraxon 分析系统用于记录运动学数据。压电传感器用于识别球与球拍接触的瞬间。变异系数确定了运动学参数的变异性。在四个确定的事件中,大多数关节角度反映了运动员身体各部位的运动方式。两种正手上旋击球时接触瞬间的加速度差异显著,但加速度值的变异性较小。角参数的变异性较大,这一结果被认为是击球动作中不同协调模式的表现。尽管运动员使用不同的方法完成动作,但他们可能会获得一些参数(例如加速度)的相似值,教练应该考虑到这一点。在单个运动员内部,许多参数之间存在较小差异,这可能表明运动员每次都以相似的方式执行任务。然而,一些角参数的变异性很高,这表明特定击球的重复动作不是以相同的方式完成的。这种现象的原因包括运动功能和功能变异性。