Suppr超能文献

关于整合社会与环境科学以开展解决方案驱动型研究的机构见解。

Institutional insights on integrating social and environmental science for solutions-driven research.

作者信息

Maxwell Keely, Hubbell Bryan, Eisenhauer Emily

机构信息

US Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, 20460, United States.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Policy. 2019 Nov 1;101:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.003.

Abstract

Solving complex environmental problems requires interdisciplinary research involving the social and environmental sciences. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is working toward solutions-driven research and interdisciplinary integration within its Office of Research and Development. This article details the history of this process and discusses lessons learned from other federal agencies seeking to integrate social and biophysical research: finding the right combination of top down and bottom up approaches; balancing objectives of advancing science and/or supporting programmatic operations; using social science methods to inform the process; and engaging multiple stakeholders. Attention to the social context of scientific practice, including research processes and research use, fosters success. Three strategies for integrating social sciences to support solutions-driven environmental research are: weaving social science throughout the research process, strengthening social networks, and fostering interdisciplinary hubs. Integration into planning and carrying out research has greater transformative potential than integration into product development and distribution. This article provides insights into institutional considerations for advancing interdisciplinarity and the social context of scientific practice in government agencies. It illustrates the multiple decision contexts and inclusion of social science at the science-policy interface.

摘要

解决复杂的环境问题需要涉及社会科学和环境科学的跨学科研究。美国环境保护局正在其研究与发展办公室开展以解决方案为导向的研究和跨学科整合工作。本文详细介绍了这一过程的历史,并讨论了从其他寻求整合社会和生物物理研究的联邦机构中吸取的经验教训:找到自上而下和自下而上方法的正确组合;平衡推进科学和/或支持项目运作的目标;运用社会科学方法为这一过程提供信息;以及让多个利益相关者参与进来。关注科学实践的社会背景,包括研究过程和研究应用,有助于取得成功。将社会科学整合以支持以解决方案为导向的环境研究的三种策略是:在整个研究过程中融入社会科学、加强社会网络以及培育跨学科中心。融入研究规划和实施比融入产品开发和分销具有更大的变革潜力。本文深入探讨了推进跨学科性的制度考量以及政府机构中科学实践的社会背景。它说明了多个决策背景以及在科学与政策界面纳入社会科学的情况。

相似文献

1
Institutional insights on integrating social and environmental science for solutions-driven research.
Environ Sci Policy. 2019 Nov 1;101:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.003.
2
Advancing Translational Research in Environmental Science: The Role and Impact of Social Sciences.
Environ Sci Policy. 2021 Jun;120:165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.010.
8
Lessons learned and recommendations in conducting solutions-driven environmental and public health research.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120270. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120270. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons learned and recommendations in conducting solutions-driven environmental and public health research.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120270. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120270. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
2
Advancing Translational Research in Environmental Science: The Role and Impact of Social Sciences.
Environ Sci Policy. 2021 Jun;120:165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.010.
3
Toward Coequality of the Social Sciences in the National Climate Assessment.
Weather Clim Soc. 2022 Oct 1;14(4):1219-1229. doi: 10.1175/wcas-d-21-0157.1.

本文引用的文献

1
How clean is clean: a review of the social science of environmental cleanups.
Environ Res Lett. 2018 Aug 16;13(8). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aad74b.
3
The updated Joanna Briggs Institute Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Mar;17(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155.
4
Understanding social and behavioral drivers and impacts of air quality sensor use.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 15;621:886-894. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.275. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
Children's Lead Exposure: A Multimedia Modeling Analysis to Guide Public Health Decision-Making.
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 12;125(9):097009. doi: 10.1289/EHP1605.
6
Chemical Risk Assessment: Traditional vs Public Health Perspectives.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jul;107(7):1032-1039. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303771. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
How to Conduct and Interpret Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 May 18;8(5):e93. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.20.
8
Rethinking Environmental Protection: Meeting the Challenges of a Changing World.
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Mar 1;125(3):A43-A49. doi: 10.1289/EHP1465.
9
Informing 21st-Century Risk Assessments with 21st-Century Science.
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Apr;124(4):A60-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1511135.
10
Sustainability: Map the evidence.
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):185-7. doi: 10.1038/528185a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验