Jensen Maj-Britt, Lænkholm Anne-Vibeke, Balslev Eva, Buckingham Wesley, Ferree Sean, Glavicic Vesna, Dupont Jensen Jeanette, Søegaard Knoop Ann, Mouridsen Henning T, Nielsen Dorte, Nielsen Torsten O, Ejlertsen Bent
Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb 26;6:7. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-0148-0. eCollection 2020.
The DBCG89D trial randomized high-risk early breast cancer patients to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil) or CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil). Prosigna assays were performed by researchers with no access to clinical data. Time to distant recurrence (DR) was the primary endpoint, time to recurrence (TR) and overall survival (OS) secondary. Among the 980 Danish patients enrolled, Prosigna results were obtained in 686. Continuous ROR score was associated with DR for CMF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.33), and for CEF (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18), = 0.06. DR was significantly longer in CEF compared to CMF treated patients with Her2-enriched tumors (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.86), but not in patients with luminal tumors. Heterogeneity of treatment effect was significant for TR and OS. In this prospective-retrospective analysis, patients with Her2-enriched breast cancer derived substantial benefit from anthracycline chemotherapy whereas anthracyclines are not an essential component of chemotherapy for patients with luminal subtypes. The benefit of CEF vs. CMF correlated with increasing ROR Score.
DBCG89D试验将高危早期乳腺癌患者随机分为接受辅助性CMF(环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶)或CEF(环磷酰胺、表柔比星和氟尿嘧啶)治疗组。Prosigna检测由无法获取临床数据的研究人员进行。远处复发时间(DR)是主要终点,复发时间(TR)和总生存期(OS)是次要终点。在纳入的980例丹麦患者中,686例获得了Prosigna检测结果。连续ROR评分与CMF组的DR相关(校正风险比(HR)1.20,95%置信区间1.09 - 1.33),与CEF组的DR也相关(HR 1.04,95%置信区间0.92 - 1.18),P = 0.06。与CMF治疗的患者相比,CEF治疗的Her2富集型肿瘤患者的DR显著更长(HR 0.58,95%置信区间0.38 - 0.86),但管腔型肿瘤患者并非如此。TR和OS的治疗效果异质性显著。在这项前瞻性 - 回顾性分析中,Her2富集型乳腺癌患者从蒽环类化疗中获益显著,而蒽环类药物并非管腔型亚型患者化疗的必要组成部分。CEF与CMF相比的获益与ROR评分增加相关。