• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别与英国国家医疗服务体系 111 电话服务接触后可避免急诊就诊的预测因素:2015-2017 年英格兰 111 电话呼叫分析。

Identifying the predictors of avoidable emergency department attendance after contact with the NHS 111 phone service: analysis of 16.6 million calls to 111 in England in 2015-2017.

机构信息

The Behavioural Insights Team, London, UK

The Behavioural Insights Team, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e032043. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032043.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032043
PMID:32152158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7066618/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To measure the frequency of patients making avoidable emergency department (ED) attendances after contact with NHS 111 and to examine whether these attendances can be predicted reliably.

DESIGN

Analysis of 16 563 946 calls made to 111, where each call was linked with a record of whether the patient attended ED within 24 hours.

SETTING

All regions of England from March 2015 to October 2017.

PARTICIPANTS AND DATA

Our main regression model used a sample of 10 954 783 calls, each with detailed patient-level information.

MAIN OUTCOME

Whether patients made an unadvised, non-urgent type 1 ED ('avoidable') attendance within 24 hours of calling 111.

RESULTS

Of 16 563 946 calls to 111, 12 894 561 (77.8%) were not advised to go to ED (ie, they were advised to either attend primary care, attend another non-ED healthcare service or to self-care). Of the calls where the patient was not advised to go to the ED, 691 783 (5.4%) resulted in the patient making an avoidable ED attendance within 24 hours. Among other factors, calls were less likely to result in these attendances when they received clinical input (adjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.53) but were more likely when the patient was female (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.08) or aged 0-4 years (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

For every 20 calls where 111 did not advise people to attend the ED, 1 resulted in avoidable ED attendance within 24 hours. These avoidable attendances could be predicted, to a certain extent, based on call characteristics. It may be possible to use this information to help 111 call handlers identify which callers are at higher risk of these attendances.

摘要

目的

测量与 NHS 111 联系后患者进行不必要急诊就诊的频率,并研究这些就诊是否可以可靠地预测。

设计

对 2015 年 3 月至 2017 年 10 月期间拨打 111 的 16563946 次电话进行分析,每次电话均与患者在 24 小时内是否到急诊就诊的记录相关联。

地点

英格兰所有地区。

参与者和数据

我们的主要回归模型使用了 10954783 次电话的样本,每次电话都有详细的患者信息。

主要结果

患者在拨打 111 后 24 小时内是否进行了无医嘱、非紧急类型 1 急诊就诊(“可避免”)。

结果

在拨打 111 的 16563946 次电话中,有 12894561 次(77.8%)未被建议去急诊就诊(即建议他们去初级保健机构就诊、去其他非急诊医疗服务机构就诊或自行护理)。在未被建议去急诊就诊的电话中,有 691783 次(5.4%)导致患者在 24 小时内进行了可避免的急诊就诊。在其他因素中,当电话获得临床输入时,这些就诊的可能性较低(调整后的比值比 0.52,95%置信区间 0.51 至 0.53),但当患者为女性(比值比 1.07,95%置信区间 1.06 至 1.08)或 0-4 岁(比值比 1.34,95%置信区间 1.33 至 1.35)时,就诊的可能性更高。

结论

在 NHS 111 不建议人们去急诊就诊的每 20 次电话中,就有 1 次导致在 24 小时内进行了可避免的急诊就诊。在一定程度上,可以根据电话特征预测这些可避免的就诊。也许可以利用这些信息帮助 NHS 111 电话接线员识别哪些来电者更有可能进行这些就诊。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b372/7066618/753b587f9335/bmjopen-2019-032043f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b372/7066618/6a2dbf2e3258/bmjopen-2019-032043f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b372/7066618/753b587f9335/bmjopen-2019-032043f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b372/7066618/6a2dbf2e3258/bmjopen-2019-032043f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b372/7066618/753b587f9335/bmjopen-2019-032043f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying the predictors of avoidable emergency department attendance after contact with the NHS 111 phone service: analysis of 16.6 million calls to 111 in England in 2015-2017.识别与英国国家医疗服务体系 111 电话服务接触后可避免急诊就诊的预测因素:2015-2017 年英格兰 111 电话呼叫分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 9;10(3):e032043. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032043.
2
Impact of Emergency Medicine Consultants and Clinical Advisors on a NHS 111 Clinical Assessment Service.急诊医学顾问和临床顾问对 NHS 111 临床评估服务的影响。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Apr;36(4):208-212. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207335.
3
Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group.非工作时间初级医疗中护士电话咨询的安全性与有效性:随机对照试验。南威尔特郡非工作时间项目(SWOOP)组
BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1054-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054.
4
Modelling NHS England 111 demand for primary care services: a discrete event simulation.模拟英格兰国民保健服务 111 对初级保健服务的需求:离散事件模拟。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):e076203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076203.
5
Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study.未被送往急诊科的拨打急救车服务电话的患者的结局:一项数据链接研究。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Jul-Aug;23(4):566-577. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Review of calls to NHS Direct related to attendance in the paediatric emergency department.对与小儿急诊科就诊相关的国民保健服务(NHS)Direct求助电话的审查。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Dec;23(12):911-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.039339.
7
Patient compliance with NHS 111 advice: Analysis of adult call and ED attendance data 2013-2017.患者对国民保健制度 111 热线建议的遵从性:2013-2017 年成人来电和急症室就诊数据分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0251362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251362. eCollection 2021.
8
The influence of personal communities in understanding avoidable emergency department attendance: qualitative study.理解可避免急诊就诊的个人社区影响:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05705-5.
9
Characterising non-urgent users of the emergency department (ED): A retrospective analysis of routine ED data.急诊科非紧急情况就诊患者的特征分析:对急诊科常规数据的回顾性分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0192855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192855. eCollection 2018.
10
An analysis of NHS 111 demand for primary care services: A retrospective cohort study.NHS111 对初级保健服务需求的分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0300193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300193. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
An analysis of NHS 111 demand for primary care services: A retrospective cohort study.NHS111 对初级保健服务需求的分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 1;19(7):e0300193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300193. eCollection 2024.
2
Emergency department staff views of NHS 111 First: qualitative interview study in England.英国紧急部门工作人员对 NHS 111 First 的看法:定性访谈研究。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Sep;40(9):636-640. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212947. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Supporting the ambulance service to safely convey fewer patients to hospital by developing a risk prediction tool: Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Suspected Seizure (RADOSS)-protocol for the mixed-methods observational RADOSS project.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of emergency department attendance following NHS 111 calls for children and young people: analysis of linked data.NHS 111为儿童和青少年呼叫后急诊就诊的预测因素:关联数据的分析
Clin Med (Lond). 2017 Jun;17(Suppl 3):s13. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-3-s13.
2
Data-driven advice for applying machine learning to bioinformatics problems.将机器学习应用于生物信息学问题的基于数据的建议。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2018;23:192-203.
3
Has the NHS 111 urgent care telephone service been a success? Case study and secondary data analysis in England.
开发风险预测工具,支持救护车服务安全地将更少的患者送往医院:疑似癫痫发作后不良结局风险(RADOSS)-混合方法观察性 RADOSS 项目方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e069156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069156.
4
To what extent do callers follow the advice given by a non-emergency medical helpline (NHS 111): A retrospective cohort study.来电者在多大程度上遵循非紧急医疗热线(NHS 111)给出的建议:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0267052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267052. eCollection 2022.
5
Patient compliance with NHS 111 advice: Analysis of adult call and ED attendance data 2013-2017.患者对国民保健制度 111 热线建议的遵从性:2013-2017 年成人来电和急症室就诊数据分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0251362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251362. eCollection 2021.
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的111紧急护理电话服务是否成功?英格兰的案例研究与二手数据分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 2;7(5):e014815. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014815.
4
Exploring the relationship between general practice characteristics, and attendance at walk-in centres, minor injuries units and EDs in England 2012/2013: a cross-sectional study.探索2012/2013年英格兰普通医疗服务特征与急诊中心、轻伤单位及急诊科就诊率之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Emerg Med J. 2016 Oct;33(10):702-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205339. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
5
Potential for advice from doctors to reduce the number of patients referred to emergency departments by NHS 111 call handlers: observational study.医生提供建议以减少国民保健署111呼叫接线员转介至急诊科的患者数量的可能性:观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 27;5(11):e009444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009444.
6
Who uses emergency departments inappropriately and when - a national cross-sectional study using a monitoring data system.谁在不恰当地使用急诊科,以及何时使用——一项使用监测数据系统的全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2013 Dec 13;11:258. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-258.
7
Impact of the urgent care telephone service NHS 111 pilot sites: a controlled before and after study.NHS111 紧急护理电话服务试点项目的影响:一项对照前后研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 14;3(11):e003451. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003451.
8
Access to primary care and visits to emergency departments in England: a cross-sectional, population-based study.英格兰的基本医疗服务可及性和急诊就诊情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e66699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066699. Print 2013.
9
Removing the health domain from the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004-effect on measured inequalities in census measure of health.从《2004年多重剥夺指数》中移除健康领域——对人口普查健康指标中所测不平等现象的影响
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Dec;28(4):379-83. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl061. Epub 2006 Oct 25.