Ryerson Univ., Canada.
Univ. of Toronto, Canada.
J Biomed Opt. 2020 Mar;25(3):1-14. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.25.3.035003.
Laser energy sealing systems have attracted much attention over the past decade given the general shift in surgical paradigm toward less invasive surgical approaches. Given this, it is paramount to have an objective method with which the quality of energy seals can be evaluated. Current methodologies used for this purpose can be problematic in the evaluation of small vessel seals. A methodology employing Doppler optical coherence tomography (DOCT) for the evaluation of energy seals is introduced. Avian chorioallantoic membrane vessels were subjected to thulium laser irradiation and were then scanned via OCT. Outcomes were classified based on several markers, predominantly the presence or absence of flow postirradiation. Vessel diameter and general morphology were also taken into consideration. Vessels were classified into four groups: seal (29%), rupture (30%), partial seal (19%), and unaffected (22%). All vessels were also evaluated visually by a trained neurovascular surgeon, and these visually classified outcomes were compared with DOCT evaluated outcomes. It was found that whether the vessel was considered sealed or not sealed was dependent on the evaluation method (p = 0.01) where visual classification resulted in 18% more seals than DOCT classification. Further, the specificity of visual classification was found to be strongly dependent on the number of partial seals (p < 0.0001). DOCT has shown to be an indispensable method for the evaluation of energy seals not only solely due to its high velocity resolution but also due to valuable microscopic morphological insight regarding the biological mechanisms responsible for energy sealing.
在过去的十年中,由于手术范式向微创方法的普遍转变,激光能量密封系统引起了广泛关注。鉴于此,拥有一种客观的方法来评估能量密封的质量至关重要。目前用于此目的的方法在评估小血管密封时可能会出现问题。本文提出了一种采用多普勒光相干断层扫描(DOCT)评估能量密封的方法。将禽类绒毛尿囊膜血管暴露于铥激光辐射下,然后通过 OCT 进行扫描。根据几个标记物,主要是辐照后是否存在血流,对结果进行分类。还考虑了血管直径和一般形态。将血管分为四组:密封(29%)、破裂(30%)、部分密封(19%)和未受影响(22%)。所有血管也由经过培训的神经血管外科医生进行了目视评估,并且将这些目视分类结果与 DOCT 评估结果进行了比较。结果发现,无论血管是否被认为是密封的,都取决于评估方法(p=0.01),其中目视分类比 DOCT 分类导致 18%的密封更多。此外,目视分类的特异性强烈依赖于部分密封的数量(p<0.0001)。DOCT 不仅由于其高速度分辨率,而且由于对能量密封负责的生物学机制具有有价值的微观形态学见解,因此已被证明是评估能量密封的不可或缺的方法。