• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于质子治疗计划的加速稳健优化算法。

Accelerated robust optimization algorithm for proton therapy treatment planning.

作者信息

Buti Gregory, Souris Kevin, Barragán Montero Ana M, Cohilis Marie, Lee John A, Sterpin Edmond

机构信息

Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):2746-2754. doi: 10.1002/mp.14132. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1002/mp.14132
PMID:32155667
Abstract

PURPOSE

Robust optimization is a computational expensive process resulting in long plan computation times. This issue is especially critical for moving targets as these cases need a large number of uncertainty scenarios to robustly optimize their treatment plans. In this study, we propose a novel worst-case robust optimization algorithm, called dynamic minimax, that accelerates the conventional minimax optimization. Dynamic minimax optimization aims at speeding up the plan optimization process by decreasing the number of evaluated scenarios in the optimization.

METHODS

For a given pool of scenarios (e.g., 63 = 7 setup  × 3 range  × 3 breathing phases), the proposed dynamic minimax algorithm only considers a reduced number of candidate-worst scenarios, selected from the full 63 scenario set. These scenarios are updated throughout the optimization by randomly sampling new scenarios according to a hidden variable P, called the "probability acceptance function," which associates with each scenario the probability of it being selected as the worst case. By doing so, the algorithm favors scenarios that are mostly "active," that is, frequently evaluated as the worst case. Additionally, unconsidered scenarios have the possibility to be re-considered, later on in the optimization, depending on the convergence towards a particular solution. The proposed algorithm was implemented in the open-source robust optimizer MIROpt and tested for six four-dimensional (4D) IMPT lung tumor patients with various tumor sizes and motions. Treatment plans were evaluated by performing comprehensive robustness tests (simulating range errors, systematic setup errors, and breathing motion) using the open-source Monte Carlo dose engine MCsquare.

RESULTS

The dynamic minimax algorithm achieved an optimization time gain of 84%, on average. The dynamic minimax optimization results in a significantly noisier optimization process due to the fact that more scenarios are accessed in the optimization. However, the increased noise level does not harm the final quality of the plan. In fact, the plan quality is similar between dynamic and conventional minimax optimization with regard to target coverage and normal tissue sparing: on average, the difference in worst-case D95 is 0.2 Gy and the difference in mean lung dose and mean heart dose is 0.4 and 0.1 Gy, respectively (evaluated in the nominal scenario).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed worst-case 4D robust optimization algorithm achieves a significant optimization time gain of 84%, without compromising target coverage or normal tissue sparing.

摘要

目的

稳健优化是一个计算成本高昂的过程,会导致较长的计划计算时间。这个问题对于移动目标尤为关键,因为这些病例需要大量的不确定性场景来稳健地优化其治疗计划。在本研究中,我们提出了一种新颖的最坏情况稳健优化算法,称为动态极小极大算法,它加速了传统的极小极大优化。动态极小极大优化旨在通过减少优化中评估的场景数量来加快计划优化过程。

方法

对于给定的一组场景(例如,63 = 7 次设置×3 种范围×3 个呼吸阶段),所提出的动态极小极大算法仅考虑从完整的 63 个场景集中选择的数量减少的候选最坏情况场景。在整个优化过程中,根据一个隐藏变量 P(称为“概率接受函数”)随机采样新场景来更新这些场景,该函数将每个场景被选为最坏情况的概率与之关联。通过这样做,该算法倾向于那些大多“活跃”的场景,即经常被评估为最坏情况的场景。此外,未考虑的场景有可能在优化后期根据向特定解的收敛情况被重新考虑。所提出的算法在开源稳健优化器 MIROpt 中实现,并针对六名具有不同肿瘤大小和运动的四维(4D)IMPT 肺癌患者进行了测试。使用开源蒙特卡罗剂量引擎 MCsquare 通过执行全面的稳健性测试(模拟范围误差、系统设置误差和呼吸运动)来评估治疗计划。

结果

动态极小极大算法平均实现了 84%的优化时间增益。由于在优化中访问了更多场景,动态极小极大优化导致优化过程明显更嘈杂。然而,增加的噪声水平不会损害计划的最终质量。事实上,在目标覆盖和正常组织保护方面,动态极小极大优化与传统极小极大优化的计划质量相似:平均而言,最坏情况 D95 的差异为 0.2 Gy,平均肺剂量和平均心脏剂量的差异分别为 0.4 和 0.1 Gy(在标称场景中评估)。

结论

所提出的最坏情况 4D 稳健优化算法实现了 84%的显著优化时间增益,而不会损害目标覆盖或正常组织保护。

相似文献

1
Accelerated robust optimization algorithm for proton therapy treatment planning.用于质子治疗计划的加速稳健优化算法。
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):2746-2754. doi: 10.1002/mp.14132. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Towards fast and robust 4D optimization for moving tumors with scanned proton therapy.面向带扫描质子治疗的移动肿瘤的快速稳健 4D 优化。
Med Phys. 2019 Dec;46(12):5434-5443. doi: 10.1002/mp.13850. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
Statistical evaluation of worst-case robust optimization intensity-modulated proton therapy plans using an exhaustive sampling approach.使用穷举采样方法对最坏情况鲁棒优化调强质子治疗计划进行统计评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul 19;14(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1335-8.
4
Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy.质子治疗中范围和设置不确定性的最小最大优化。
Med Phys. 2011 Mar;38(3):1672-84. doi: 10.1118/1.3556559.
5
Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).技术说明:治疗计划系统(TPS)的近似值很重要——比较商业TPS 和内部开发的 TPS 在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的强度调制质子治疗(IMPT)计划质量和稳健性。
Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):4755-4762. doi: 10.1002/mp.13809. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
6
Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌患者中不对称呼吸的调强质子治疗(IMPT)相互作用效应评估及同步不确定性考量
Med Phys. 2020 Nov;47(11):5428-5440. doi: 10.1002/mp.14491. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Automated proton treatment planning with robust optimization using constrained hierarchical optimization.使用约束分层优化进行稳健优化的自动质子治疗计划
Med Phys. 2020 Jul;47(7):2779-2790. doi: 10.1002/mp.14148. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
Treatment planning and 4D robust evaluation strategy for proton therapy of lung tumors with large motion amplitude.大运动幅度肺部肿瘤质子治疗的计划制定和 4D 稳健性评估策略。
Med Phys. 2021 Aug;48(8):4425-4437. doi: 10.1002/mp.15067. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
9
Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.小光斑与大光斑:在笔形束扫描质子治疗肺癌中对计划质量的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13512. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13512. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
10
A novel and individualized robust optimization method using normalized dose interval volume constraints (NDIVC) for intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy.一种使用归一化剂量区间体积约束(NDIVC)的新颖且个体化的稳健优化方法,用于强度调制质子放射治疗。
Med Phys. 2019 Jan;46(1):382-393. doi: 10.1002/mp.13276. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A Python package for fast GPU-based proton pencil beam dose calculation.一个用于基于GPU的快速质子笔形束剂量计算的Python软件包。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jun;26(6):e70093. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70093. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
2
Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Systemic radiotherapy using targeted isotopes is the best hope for advancing curative radiation therapy.三维适形放疗(3DCRT)专题辩论:使用靶向同位素的全身放疗是推进根治性放疗的最大希望。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Nov;25(11):e14533. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14533. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
Autodelineation methods in a simulated fully automated proton therapy workflow for esophageal cancer.
用于食管癌的模拟全自动化质子治疗工作流程中的自动勾画方法。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 14;32:100646. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100646. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Being certain about uncertainties: a robust evaluation method for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including the combination of uncertainties.明确不确定性:一种稳健的评估方法,用于评估包括不确定性组合的高剂量率前列腺近距离治疗计划。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Sep;46(3):1115-1130. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01279-8. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer.针对前列腺癌 TomoHelical 计划中几何不确定性的鲁棒优化的有效性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Apr;24(4):e13881. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13881. Epub 2022 Dec 28.