• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国人如何应对全球变暖对健康影响的信息:一项全国性调查实验的证据。

How Americans Respond to Information About Global Warming's Health Impacts: Evidence From a National Survey Experiment.

作者信息

Kotcher John, Maibach Edward, Montoro Marybeth, Hassol Susan Joy

机构信息

Center for Climate Change Communication George Mason University Fairfax VA USA.

Climate Communication, LLC Hillsborough NC USA.

出版信息

Geohealth. 2018 Sep 24;2(9):262-275. doi: 10.1029/2018GH000154. eCollection 2018 Sep.

DOI:10.1029/2018GH000154
PMID:32159018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7007167/
Abstract

Americans tend to see global warming as a distant threat, but a small body of previous research suggests that information about the health implications of global warming may enhance public engagement with the issue. We sought to extend those findings with a longitudinal study that examined how Americans react to information about eight of health impacts from global warming. In winter 2017, we conducted a two-wave survey experiment using a quota sample of American adults ( = 2,254). Participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group who read eight brief essays about different categories of health impacts from global warming or to a control group who received no information. Participants answered questions before reading the essays, immediately after reading each essay and at the conclusion of all essays (treatment participants only), and 2-3 weeks later. Reading the information had small- to medium-sized effects on multiple indicators of participants' cognitive and affective engagement with global warming, especially among people who are politically moderate and somewhat conservative; some of these changes persisted 2-3 weeks later. Some impacts were seen as more novel and worrisome, including illnesses from contaminated food, water, and disease-carrying organisms. Our findings provide the most definitive evidence to date about the importance of raising awareness about the health impacts of global warming. While participants believed all of the essays as offered valuable information, educational efforts might most productively focus on impacts that are relatively less familiar and more emotionally engaging, such as food-, water-, and vector-borne illnesses.

摘要

美国人往往将全球变暖视为一种遥远的威胁,但此前的一小部分研究表明,有关全球变暖对健康影响的信息可能会增强公众对这一问题的关注。我们试图通过一项纵向研究来扩展这些发现,该研究考察了美国人对全球变暖八大健康影响信息的反应。2017年冬季,我们使用美国成年人的配额样本(n = 2254)进行了一项两阶段的调查实验。参与者被随机分配到一个处理组,该组阅读了八篇关于全球变暖不同类别健康影响的短文,或者被分配到一个对照组,该组没有收到任何信息。参与者在阅读短文前、阅读每篇短文后立即以及在所有短文结束后(仅处理组参与者)回答问题,以及在2至3周后回答问题。阅读这些信息对参与者在认知和情感上对全球变暖的参与度的多个指标产生了小到中等程度的影响,尤其是在政治立场温和和有点保守的人群中;其中一些变化在2至3周后仍然存在。一些影响被认为更新颖、更令人担忧,包括来自受污染食物、水和携带疾病生物的疾病。我们的研究结果提供了迄今为止关于提高对全球变暖健康影响认识的重要性的最确凿证据。虽然参与者认为所有短文都提供了有价值的信息,但教育努力可能最有效地集中在相对不太熟悉且更能引起情感共鸣的影响上,例如食物、水和媒介传播的疾病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048f/7007167/6c836b829324/GH2-2-262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048f/7007167/6c836b829324/GH2-2-262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/048f/7007167/6c836b829324/GH2-2-262-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
How Americans Respond to Information About Global Warming's Health Impacts: Evidence From a National Survey Experiment.美国人如何应对全球变暖对健康影响的信息:一项全国性调查实验的证据。
Geohealth. 2018 Sep 24;2(9):262-275. doi: 10.1029/2018GH000154. eCollection 2018 Sep.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Do Americans Understand That Global Warming Is Harmful to Human Health? Evidence From a National Survey.美国人明白全球变暖对人类健康有害吗?来自一项全国性调查的证据。
Ann Glob Health. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):396-409. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.010.
4
Global warming's five Germanys: A typology of Germans' views on climate change and patterns of media use and information.全球变暖的五个德国:德国人对气候变化的看法以及媒体使用和信息模式的类型学。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 May;26(4):434-451. doi: 10.1177/0963662515592558. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Global Warming's Six MTurks: A Secondary Analysis of a US-Based Online Crowdsourcing Market.全球变暖的六个人工智能:对一个基于美国的在线众包市场的二次分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 7;19(14):8320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148320.
6
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
7
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
8
Climate changes, environment and infection: facts, scenarios and growing awareness from the public health community within Europe.气候变化、环境和感染:来自欧洲公共卫生界的事实、情景和不断增强的意识。
Anaerobe. 2011 Dec;17(6):337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
9
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
10
Public perceptions of climate change as a human health risk: surveys of the United States, Canada and Malta.公众对气候变化作为人类健康风险的认知:对美国、加拿大和马耳他的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Jun;7(6):2559-606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7062559. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Health Communication Approaches for Building Common Ground.建立共识的公共卫生沟通方法
Am J Public Health. 2025 Apr;115(4):511-518. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.308003. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
2
Climate Change, Kidney Health, and Environmentally Sustainable Kidney Care: A Multinational Survey of Health Care Professionals.气候变化、肾脏健康与环境可持续性肾脏护理:一项针对医疗保健专业人员的跨国调查
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Aug 1;35(8):1084-1094. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000402. Epub 2024 May 20.
3
Climate change and health: three grand challenges.

本文引用的文献

1
Vulnerable Populations Perceive Their Health as at Risk from Climate Change.弱势群体认为他们的健康受到气候变化的威胁。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 4;12(12):15419-33. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121214994.
2
Do Americans Understand That Global Warming Is Harmful to Human Health? Evidence From a National Survey.美国人明白全球变暖对人类健康有害吗?来自一项全国性调查的证据。
Ann Glob Health. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):396-409. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.010.
3
Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.
气候变化与健康:三大挑战。
Nat Med. 2023 Jul;29(7):1631-1638. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02438-w. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
4
Communication research to improve engagement with climate change and human health: A review.沟通研究以提高对气候变化和人类健康的参与度:综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;10:1086858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086858. eCollection 2022.
5
Perceptions of the health impacts of climate change among Canadians.加拿大民众对气候变化健康影响的认知。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15105-z.
6
Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.循证建议用于沟通气候变化对健康的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 25;12(4):543-553. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac029.
7
Can citizen pressure influence politicians' communication about climate change? Results from a field experiment.公民压力能影响政治家关于气候变化的沟通吗?一项实地实验的结果。
Clim Change. 2021;168(1-2):6. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03215-9. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Science Policy to Advance a Climate Change and Health Research Agenda in the United States.推动美国气候变化与健康研究议程的科学政策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157868.
9
Making the climate crisis personal through a focus on human health.通过关注人类健康,让气候危机与个人相关。
Clim Change. 2021;166(3-4):43. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03107-y. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study.卫生专业人员对气候变化与健康的看法:一项多国调查研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 May;5(5):e316-e323. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00053-X. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
运用道德基础理论转变自由主义和保守主义态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Dec;40(12):1559-73. doi: 10.1177/0146167214551152. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
The moral roots of environmental attitudes.环境态度的道德根源。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/0956797612449177. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
5
The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?双项量表的信度:皮尔逊、克伦巴赫还是斯皮尔曼-布朗?
Int J Public Health. 2013 Aug;58(4):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
6
The rise of global warming skepticism: exploring affective image associations in the United States over time.全球变暖怀疑论的兴起:随着时间的推移,探索美国的情感形象关联。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jun;32(6):1021-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01801.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
The psychological distance of climate change.气候变化的心理距离。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jun;32(6):957-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
8
Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactions.将气候变化重新定义为公共卫生问题:公众反应的探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 1;10:299. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-299.
9
Communication and marketing as tools to cultivate the public's health: a proposed "people and places" framework.作为培养公众健康工具的沟通与营销:一个提议的“人与场所”框架。
BMC Public Health. 2007 May 22;7:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-88.