• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于经验共同设计的同伴支持模式的开发,以改善重症监护恢复情况。

Development of a Peer Support Model Using Experience-Based Co-Design to Improve Critical Care Recovery.

作者信息

Haines Kimberley J, Holdsworth Clare, Cranwell Kathryn, Skinner Elizabeth H, Holton Sara, MacLeod-Smith Belinda, Bates Samantha, Iwashyna Theodore J, French Craig, Booth Sarah, Carmody Jacki, Henningham Lucy, Searle Grey, Shackell Melina, Maher Lynne

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2019 Mar 22;1(3):e0006. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000006. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000006
PMID:32166251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063862/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

To use experience-based co-design to identify the key design requirements of a peer support model for critical care survivors; understand the use of the experience-based co-design method from clinician, patients, and family perspectives.

DESIGN

Using experience-based co-design, qualitative data about participants' preferences for a peer support model were generated via workshops. Participants' perspectives of experience-based co-design were evaluated with focus groups.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital in Melbourne, Australia.

SUBJECTS

Snowball sampling was used to recruit clinicians from across the care spectrum (ICU-community); critical care survivors and nominated family members were recruited using convenience sampling.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Consensus on a peer support model was reached through the experience-based co-design process, with the following key themes: 1) socialization and group cohesion; 2) management of potential risks; and 3) individualized needs of patients and families. Evaluation of participants' perspectives of the experience-based co-design method identified five key themes: 1) participation as a positive experience; 2) emotional engagement in the process; 3) learning from patients and family members; 4) feeling heard; and 5) practical challenges of experience-based co-design and readiness to participate.

CONCLUSIONS

Experience-based co-design was a feasible approach to developing a peer support model for use with critical care survivors and was well received by participants. Future testing of the co-designed peer support model in a pilot randomized controlled trial will enhance understanding of peer support in critical care and the use of experience-based co-design as a design methodology.

摘要

未标注

运用基于经验的协同设计来确定重症监护幸存者同伴支持模式的关键设计要求;从临床医生、患者及家属的角度理解基于经验的协同设计方法的应用。

设计

采用基于经验的协同设计,通过研讨会生成关于参与者对同伴支持模式偏好的定性数据。通过焦点小组评估参与者对基于经验的协同设计的看法。

地点

澳大利亚墨尔本的一家大学附属医院。

研究对象

采用滚雪球抽样法从整个护理领域(重症监护病房 - 社区)招募临床医生;采用便利抽样法招募重症监护幸存者及其指定的家庭成员。

测量与主要结果

通过基于经验的协同设计过程就同伴支持模式达成了共识,主要有以下关键主题:1)社交与团队凝聚力;2)潜在风险的管理;3)患者及家属的个性化需求。对参与者对基于经验的协同设计方法看法的评估确定了五个关键主题:1)参与是一种积极体验;2)过程中的情感投入;3)向患者及家属学习;4)感到被倾听;5)基于经验的协同设计的实际挑战及参与意愿。

结论

基于经验的协同设计是开发用于重症监护幸存者的同伴支持模式的一种可行方法,且受到参与者的欢迎。在一项试点随机对照试验中对共同设计的同伴支持模式进行进一步测试,将增进对重症监护中同伴支持以及将基于经验的协同设计作为一种设计方法的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24aa/7063862/bb561e1ea7e0/cc9-1-e0006-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24aa/7063862/bb561e1ea7e0/cc9-1-e0006-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24aa/7063862/bb561e1ea7e0/cc9-1-e0006-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Peer Support Model Using Experience-Based Co-Design to Improve Critical Care Recovery.基于经验共同设计的同伴支持模式的开发,以改善重症监护恢复情况。
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Mar 22;1(3):e0006. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000006. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Enablers and Barriers to Implementing ICU Follow-Up Clinics and Peer Support Groups Following Critical Illness: The Thrive Collaboratives.实施 ICU 随访诊所和重症后同伴支持小组的促成因素和障碍:茁壮成长合作组织。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1194-1200. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003818.
3
Changing support needs of survivors of complex critical illness and their family caregivers across the care continuum: a qualitative pilot study of Towards RECOVER.复杂危重症幸存者及其家庭照顾者在整个护理连续过程中不断变化的支持需求:迈向康复(Towards RECOVER)的定性试点研究
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
4
Optimizing Critical Illness Recovery: Perspectives and Solutions From the Caregivers of ICU Survivors.优化危重症康复:重症监护病房幸存者照顾者的观点与解决方案
Crit Care Explor. 2021 May 12;3(5):e0420. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000420. eCollection 2021 May.
5
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
6
The Prevalence of Spiritual and Social Support Needs and Their Association With Postintensive Care Syndrome Symptoms Among Critical Illness Survivors Seen in a Post-ICU Follow-Up Clinic.在重症监护病房后随访诊所中见到的危重症幸存者的精神和社会支持需求患病率及其与重症监护后综合征症状的关联。
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Apr 8;4(4):e0676. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000676. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
An International Study Exploring the Experience of Survivors of Critical Illness as Volunteers Within ICU Recovery Services.一项探索危重症幸存者作为重症监护病房康复服务志愿者的经历的国际研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Nov 19;2(11):e0273. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000273. eCollection 2020 Nov.
8
Clinician Perspectives on an Electronic Portal to Improve Communication with Patients and Families in the Intensive Care Unit.临床医生对电子门户改善重症监护病房医患沟通的看法。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Dec;13(12):2197-2206. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605-351OC.
9
Meeting the needs of critical care patients after discharge home: a qualitative exploratory study of patient perspectives.出院后满足重症监护患者的需求:一项患者观点的定性探索性研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Nov;23(6):316-323. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12305. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Authentic Online Co-Design: Partnership-Focussed Principles-Driven Online Co-Design.面向真实在线共同设计的框架的开发与评估:以伙伴关系为重点的原则驱动型在线共同设计。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14138. doi: 10.1111/hex.14138.
2
Co-design of digital health interventions with young people: A scoping review.与年轻人共同设计数字健康干预措施:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 11;9:20552076231219117. doi: 10.1177/20552076231219117. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Follow-up focused on psychological intervention initiated after intensive care unit in adult patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Report Developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive International Peer Support Collaborative.同伴支持改善重症监护后综合征模式:重症监护医学学会茁壮成长国际同伴支持协作制定的报告。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):e21-e27. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003497.
2
Peer Support in Critical Care: A Systematic Review.重症监护中的同伴支持:系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1522-1531. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003293.
3
Patient and Family Engagement in the ICU. Untapped Opportunities and Underrecognized Challenges.
成人患者和非专业照护者在重症监护病房后的心理干预随访:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Jun 9;11:e15260. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15260. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluating the Co-design of an Age-Friendly, Rural, Multidisciplinary Primary Care Model: A Study Protocol.评估一个关爱老年人、农村多学科初级保健模式的协同设计:一项研究方案
Methods Protoc. 2022 Mar 7;5(2):23. doi: 10.3390/mps5020023.
5
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters in Surrogate Decision Makers of Patients Experiencing Chronic Critical Illness.慢性危重病患者替代决策者的创伤后应激障碍症状群
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 1;4(3):e0647. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000647. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
7
Nutritional Interventions on Physical Functioning for Critically Ill Patients: An Integrative Review.危重症患者身体功能的营养干预:一项综合综述。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jun 18;14:1489-1507. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S314132. eCollection 2021.
8
The manifestation of participation within a co-design process involving patients, significant others and health-care professionals.参与式设计过程中患者、重要他人和医疗保健专业人员的表现。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):905-916. doi: 10.1111/hex.13233. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Trial Design in Critical Care Nutrition: The Past, Present and Future.重症营养中的试验设计:过去、现在和未来。
Nutrients. 2020 Nov 30;12(12):3694. doi: 10.3390/nu12123694.
10
Prediction Models for Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Health Impairments After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.重症后身体、认知和心理健康损伤的预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1871-1880. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004659.
重症监护病房中的患者和家属参与。未开发的机会和未被认识到的挑战。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug 1;198(3):310-319. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201710-2032CI.
4
The Untapped Potential of Patient and Family Engagement in the Organization of Critical Care.患者及家属参与重症护理组织的未开发潜力
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):899-906. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002282.
5
Peer Support as a Novel Strategy to Mitigate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.同伴支持作为减轻重症监护后综合征的一种新策略。
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;27(2):221-9. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016667.
6
Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them.定性研究方法:何时使用以及如何评判
Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):498-501. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev334. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
The Prevalence of Compassion Fatigue and Burnout among Healthcare Professionals in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review.重症监护病房医护人员中同情疲劳和职业倦怠的患病率:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0136955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136955. eCollection 2015.
9
The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting.CORE研究方案:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验,旨在测试一种协同设计技术,以优化社区心理健康环境中受精神疾病影响者的心理社会康复结果。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006688.
10
Time to deliver patient centred care.是时候提供以患者为中心的护理了。
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:h530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h530.