Suppr超能文献

急诊科即时超声对危重症非创伤患者护理流程及结局的影响

Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department on Care Processes and Outcomes in Critically Ill Nontraumatic Patients.

作者信息

Mosier Jarrod M, Stolz Uwe, Milligan Rebecca, Roy-Chaudhury Akshay, Lutrick Karen, Hypes Cameron D, Billheimer Dean, Cairns Charles B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2019 Jun 26;1(6):e0019. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000019. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Outcomes data on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in critically ill patients are lacking. This study examines the association between POCUS in the emergency department and outcomes in critically ill patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of critically ill emergency department patients in two academic emergency departments. All emergency department patients admitted to the intensive care unit or that die in the emergency department were entered prospectively into a registry.

SETTING

Two academic emergency departments.

PATIENTS

All adult (> 18 years old) non-trauma patients with hemodynamic instability [shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) > 0.6] between November 1, 2013-October 31, 2016, were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Cohorts were assigned as follows: no POCUS (cohort 1), POCUS prior to a key intervention (cohort 2), and POCUS after a key intervention (cohort 3). A key intervention was either a fluid bolus or vasoactive drug initiation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between POCUS use and the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. We conducted several sensitivity analyses including propensity score matching and inverse-probability-weighted regression-adjustment along with multiple imputation to account for non-random assignment of POCUS as well as bias due to missing data. Of the 7,734 eligible patients, 2,293 patients were excluded. The remaining 5,441 patients were included in the analysis: 4165 in Cohort 1, 614 in Cohort 2, and 662 in Cohort 3. Mortality was 22%, 29%, and 26%, respectively ( < 0.001). POCUS prior to an intervention was associated with an adjusted odds ratio for death of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.12-1.76) compared to no POCUS. The sensitivity analyses showed an absolute increased mortality of +0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.09) for cohort 2 compared to 1.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS use prior to interventions appears to be associated with care delays and increased in-hospital mortality compared to critically ill patients with no POCUS. Further explorations of the impact of POCUS in the emergency department appear warranted.

摘要

未标注

危重症患者即时超声检查(POCUS)的预后数据尚缺。本研究探讨急诊科POCUS与危重症患者预后之间的关联。

设计

对两个学术性急诊科的危重症患者进行回顾性队列研究。所有入住重症监护病房或在急诊科死亡的急诊科患者均前瞻性纳入登记系统。

地点

两个学术性急诊科。

患者

纳入2013年11月1日至2016年10月31日期间所有血流动力学不稳定(休克指数(心率/收缩压)>0.6)的成年(>18岁)非创伤患者。

干预措施

队列分组如下:未行POCUS(队列1)、关键干预前进行POCUS(队列2)、关键干预后进行POCUS(队列3)。关键干预为给予液体冲击治疗或开始使用血管活性药物。

测量指标及主要结果

采用多变量逻辑回归评估POCUS使用与院内死亡这一主要结局之间的关联。我们进行了多项敏感性分析,包括倾向评分匹配、逆概率加权回归调整以及多重填补,以处理POCUS的非随机分配以及数据缺失导致的偏倚。在7734例符合条件的患者中,2293例被排除。其余5441例患者纳入分析:队列1中有4165例,队列2中有614例,队列3中有662例。死亡率分别为22%、29%和26%(<0.001)。与未行POCUS相比,干预前进行POCUS的患者死亡校正比值比为1.41(95%CI,1.12 - 1.76)。敏感性分析显示,与队列1相比,队列2的绝对死亡率增加了+0.05(95%CI,0.02 - 0.09)。

结论

与未行POCUS的危重症患者相比,干预前使用POCUS似乎与治疗延迟及院内死亡率增加有关。急诊科POCUS影响的进一步探索似乎很有必要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aaea/7063915/cd4767ff052a/cc9-1-e0019-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验