Ingram Maia, Adkins Arlie, Hansen Krista, Cascio Vanessa, Somnez Evren
University of Arizona, College of Public Health 1295 N. Martin, Tucson Arizona 85721 USA.
University of Arizona, College of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture, 1040 N. Olive Rd., Tucson, AZ 85719 USA.
J Transp Health. 2017 Dec;7(B):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.001.
Walking is the most fundamental form of active travel, as well as the most popular form of physical activity. The built and social environment, however, may not adequately support active living, especially in low-income communities. While improving the walking infrastructure is essential, assumptions regarding perceptions of walkability based on a standardized norm may fail to address preferences within specific populations. Particularly in low-income and ethnically diverse urban environments, it is not clear whether objective or perceived measures provide the best assessment of an environments' conduciveness to walkability. This qualitative study of five Mexican American neighborhoods used walk-and-talk focus groups (n=20) and intercept surveys (n=108) to investigate residents' perceptions of their walking environments. Respondents differentiated between physical and social attributes in assessing neighborhood walkability. Physical attributes, such as lack of infrastructure, maintenance and traffic, were more salient to residents when describing what discouraged them from walking. Perceptions of the social environment appeared to be of greater significance than the physical environment in encouraging individuals to walk. While respondents were concerned about personal safety, the overall sociability of the neighborhood, nearby family, familiarity between neighbors, and a sense of social activity all contributed to a positive assessment of walkability and expressed desire to walk, Findings revealed complex interactions between characteristics of the social, built, natural, and policy environments. The emphasis on sociocultural influences on perceptions of walkability underscores the importance of engaging neighborhoods in conversations about their walking environments to reveal strategies that better serve the needs of residents.
步行是主动出行最基本的形式,也是最受欢迎的体育活动形式。然而,建成环境和社会环境可能无法充分支持积极的生活方式,尤其是在低收入社区。虽然改善步行基础设施至关重要,但基于标准化规范对步行适宜性的认知假设可能无法满足特定人群的偏好。特别是在低收入和种族多样化的城市环境中,尚不清楚客观指标还是主观认知指标能更好地评估一个环境对步行的适宜程度。这项针对五个墨西哥裔美国人社区的定性研究,采用边走边谈焦点小组(n = 20)和拦截式调查(n = 108)来调查居民对其步行环境的认知。在评估社区步行适宜性时,受访者区分了物理属性和社会属性。在描述阻碍他们步行的因素时,诸如缺乏基础设施、维护不善和交通状况等物理属性对居民来说更为突出。在鼓励人们步行方面,社会环境的认知似乎比物理环境更为重要。虽然受访者担心个人安全,但社区的整体社交性、附近的家人、邻里之间的熟悉程度以及社会活动感都有助于对步行适宜性做出积极评价,并表达了步行的意愿。研究结果揭示了社会、建成、自然和政策环境特征之间的复杂相互作用。对社会文化对步行适宜性认知的影响的强调,凸显了让社区参与有关其步行环境的对话以揭示更好满足居民需求的策略的重要性。