Population Health Intervention Research Centre, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Nov 13;8:125. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-125.
Empirical evidence suggests that an association between the built environment and physical activity exists. This evidence is mostly derived from cross-sectional studies that do not account for other causal explanations such as neighborhood self-selection. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs can be used to isolate the effect of the built environment on physical activity, but in their absence, statistical techniques that adjust for neighborhood self-selection can be used with cross-sectional data. Previous reviews examining the built environment-physical activity relationship have not differentiated among findings based on study design. To deal with self-selection, we synthesized evidence regarding the relationship between objective measures of the built environment and physical activity by including in our review: 1) cross-sectional studies that adjust for neighborhood self-selection and 2) quasi-experiments.
In September 2010, we searched for English-language studies on built environments and physical activity from all available years in health, leisure, transportation, social sciences, and geographical databases. Twenty cross-sectional and 13 quasi-experimental studies published between 1996 and 2010 were included in the review.
Most associations between the built environment and physical activity were in the expected direction or null. Land use mix, connectivity and population density and overall neighborhood design were however, important determinants of physical activity. The built environment was more likely to be associated with transportation walking compared with other types of physical activity including recreational walking. Three studies found an attenuation in associations between built environment characteristics and physical activity after accounting for neighborhood self-selection.
More quasi-experiments that examine a broader range of environmental attributes in relation to context-specific physical activity and that measure changes in the built environment, neighborhood preferences and their effect on physical activity are needed.
实证证据表明,建筑环境与身体活动之间存在关联。这些证据主要来自于横断面研究,这些研究没有考虑到其他因果解释,如邻里自我选择。实验和准实验设计可用于隔离建筑环境对身体活动的影响,但在缺乏这些设计的情况下,可使用横断面数据和调整邻里自我选择的统计技术。之前审查建筑环境与身体活动关系的综述并没有根据研究设计对发现进行区分。为了解决自我选择问题,我们综合了关于客观建筑环境指标与身体活动之间关系的证据,包括:1)调整邻里自我选择的横断面研究,以及 2)准实验。
2010 年 9 月,我们在健康、休闲、交通、社会科学和地理数据库中搜索了所有年份的有关建筑环境和身体活动的英文研究。共纳入了 20 项横断面研究和 13 项准实验研究,这些研究发表于 1996 年至 2010 年之间。
建筑环境与身体活动之间的大多数关联都符合预期或呈中性。然而,土地利用混合、连通性和人口密度以及整体邻里设计是身体活动的重要决定因素。与其他类型的身体活动(包括娱乐性步行)相比,建筑环境更可能与交通步行相关。有三项研究发现,在考虑邻里自我选择后,建筑环境特征与身体活动之间的关联有所减弱。
需要更多的准实验研究,这些研究应更广泛地检查与特定环境下身体活动相关的环境属性,并测量建筑环境、邻里偏好及其对身体活动的影响的变化。