• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 3 阶段、变时距、知觉调节的轨道测试中确定次最大和最大训练区。

Determination of Submaximal and Maximal Training Zones From a 3-Stage, Variable-Duration, Perceptually Regulated Track Test.

出版信息

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Mar 15;15(6):853-861. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0423. Print 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1123/ijspp.2019-0423
PMID:32176864
Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate a new perceptually regulated, self-paced maximal oxygen consumption field test (the Running Advisor Billat Training [RABIT] test) that can be used by recreational runners to define personalized training zones.

DESIGN

In a cross-sectional study, male and female recreational runners (N = 12; mean [SD] age = 43 [8] y) completed 3 maximal exercise tests (2 RABIT tests and a University of Montreal Track Test), with a 48-hour interval between tests.

METHODS

The University of Montreal Track Test was a continuous, incremental track test with a 0.5-km·h-1 increment every minute until exhaustion. The RABIT tests were conducted at intensities of 11, 14, and 17 on the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for 10, 5, and 3 minutes, respectively, with a 1-minute rest between efforts.

RESULTS

The 2 RABIT tests and the University of Montreal Track Test gave similar mean (SD) maximal oxygen consumption values (53.9 [6.4], 56.4 [9.1], and 55.4 [7.6] mL·kg-1·min-1, respectively, P = .722). The cardiorespiratory and speed responses were reliable as a function of the running intensity (RPE: 11, 14, and 17) and the relative time point for each RPE stage. Indeed, the oxygen consumption, heart rate, ventilation, and speed values did not differ significantly when the running time was expressed as a relative duration of 30%, 60%, or 90% (ie, at 3, 6, and 9 min of a 10-min effort at RPE 11; P = .997).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that the RABIT test is a valid method for defining submaximal and maximal training zones in recreational runners.

摘要

目的

验证一种新的感知调节、自我调节最大摄氧量现场测试(Running Advisor Billat Training [RABIT] 测试),该测试可被休闲跑者用于定义个性化训练区。

设计

在一项横断面研究中,男性和女性休闲跑者(N=12;平均[标准差]年龄=43[8]岁)完成了 3 次最大运动测试(2 次 RABIT 测试和蒙特利尔大学田径测试),两次测试之间间隔 48 小时。

方法

蒙特利尔大学田径测试是一项连续递增的田径测试,每 1 分钟增加 0.5 公里·小时-1,直至力竭。RABIT 测试在感知用力等级(RPE)量表上分别以 11、14 和 17 的强度进行 10、5 和 3 分钟,每个强度之间休息 1 分钟。

结果

2 次 RABIT 测试和蒙特利尔大学田径测试得出的最大摄氧量平均值(SD)相似(分别为 53.9[6.4]、56.4[9.1]和 55.4[7.6]mL·kg-1·min-1,P=.722)。心肺功能和速度反应随跑步强度(RPE:11、14 和 17)和每个 RPE 阶段的相对时间点而可靠。实际上,当跑步时间表示为 30%、60%或 90%(即在 RPE 11 时,10 分钟努力的第 3、6 和 9 分钟)的相对持续时间时,摄氧量、心率、通气和速度值没有显著差异(P=.997)。

结论

结果表明,RABIT 测试是确定休闲跑者亚最大和最大训练区的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Determination of Submaximal and Maximal Training Zones From a 3-Stage, Variable-Duration, Perceptually Regulated Track Test.从 3 阶段、变时距、知觉调节的轨道测试中确定次最大和最大训练区。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Mar 15;15(6):853-861. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0423. Print 2020 Jul 1.
2
Effects of a 4-week high-intensity interval training on pacing during 5-km running trial.为期4周的高强度间歇训练对5公里跑步试验中配速的影响。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017 Oct 19;50(12):e6335. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20176335.
3
Perceptually Regulated Exercise Test Allows Determination of V˙O2max and Ventilatory Threshold But Not Respiratory Compensation Point In Trained Runners.感知调节运动测试可确定训练有素的跑步者的最大摄氧量和通气阈值,但无法确定呼吸补偿点。
Int J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;39(4):304-313. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122741. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Better Economy on Indoor Track Compared to Treadmill Running With 1% Inclination.在室内跑道上跑步比在倾斜 1%的跑步机上跑步更经济。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Dec;90(4):470-478. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1618784. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
Determination of blood lactate training zone boundaries with rating of perceived exertion in runners.通过跑步者的主观用力程度评级来确定血乳酸训练区边界
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Feb;29(2):315-20. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000639.
6
A new field test to estimate the aerobic and anaerobic thresholds and maximum parameters.一种新的现场测试方法,用于估计有氧和无氧阈值及最大参数。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 May;20(4):437-443. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1640289. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Self-Paced Field Running Test in Monitoring Fatigue and Training Adaptations in Recreational Runners.自我节奏场地跑步测试在监测业余跑步者疲劳与训练适应性方面的应用
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2024 Sep 6;19(11):1299-1306. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2024-0105. Print 2024 Nov 1.
8
Is Rating of Perceived Exertion a Valuable Tool for Monitoring Exercise Intensity During Steady-State Conditions in Elite Endurance Athletes?评定感知用力是否是监测精英耐力运动员稳定状态下运动强度的有用工具?
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):1589-1595. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0866. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
The effect of estimation and production procedures on running economy in recreational athletes.估计和产生程序对娱乐运动员跑步经济性的影响。
J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Nov;15(6):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 May 11.
10
The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from perceptually regulated graded exercise tests of different durations.通过不同时长的感知调节分级运动试验预测最大摄氧量的有效性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Jul;97(5):535-41. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0213-x. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Rating of perceived exertion in continuous sports: a scoping review with evidence gap map.持续性运动中自感用力度的评定:一项带有证据缺口图的范围综述
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jul 15;7:1553998. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1553998. eCollection 2025.
2
Multidimensional Analysis of Physiological Entropy during Self-Paced Marathon Running.自我节奏马拉松跑过程中生理熵的多维分析
Sports (Basel). 2024 Sep 12;12(9):252. doi: 10.3390/sports12090252.
3
Brain, Metabolic, and RPE Responses during a Free-Pace Marathon: A Preliminary Study.
自由 paced 马拉松比赛中脑、代谢和 RPE 的反应:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 3;21(8):1024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081024.
4
A Pilot Study Using Entropy for Optimizing Self-Pacing during a Marathon.一项利用熵优化马拉松比赛中自我配速的初步研究。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;25(8):1119. doi: 10.3390/e25081119.
5
Is there a relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and executive performance as function of mental workload in young adults?在年轻人中,心肺适能与作为心理负荷函数的执行能力之间是否存在关联?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:932345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932345. eCollection 2022.
6
The Carbon Footprint of Marathon Runners: Training and Racing.马拉松运动员的碳足迹:训练和比赛。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 9;18(5):2769. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052769.
7
Effects of preferred music on physiological responses, perceived exertion, and anaerobic threshold determination in an incremental running test on both sexes.偏好音乐对男女递增跑步测试中生理反应、感知用力和无氧阈确定的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0237310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237310. eCollection 2020.
8
Pacing Strategy Affects the Sub-Elite Marathoner's Cardiac Drift and Performance.配速策略影响次精英马拉松运动员的心脏漂移和运动表现。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 19;10:3026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03026. eCollection 2019.