• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用互联网:参加大规模在线营养课程的普通民众的营养信息搜索行为。

Using the Internet: Nutrition Information-Seeking Behaviours of Lay People Enrolled in a Massive Online Nutrition Course.

机构信息

The Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Level 1 264 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC 3168, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2020 Mar 12;12(3):750. doi: 10.3390/nu12030750.

DOI:10.3390/nu12030750
PMID:32178291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7146568/
Abstract

People's accessibility to nutrition information is now near universal due to internet access, and the information available varies in its scientific integrity and provider expertise. Understanding the information-seeking behaviours of the public is paramount for providing sound nutrition advice. This research aims to identify who learners in a nutrition-focused Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) turn to for nutrition information, and how they discuss the information they find. A multi-methods approach explored the information-seeking and sharing behaviours of MOOC learners. Summative content analysis, and an exploratory, inductive, qualitative approach analysed learners' posts in MOOC discussion forums. From 476 posts, the majority (58.6%) of nutrition information sources learners reported were from websites. Providers of nutrition information were most commonly (34%) tertiary educated individuals lacking identifiable nutrition qualifications; 19% had no identifiable author information, and only 5% were from nutrition professionals. Qualitative themes identified that learners used nutrition information to learn, teach and share nutrition information. Consistent with connectivist learning theory, learners contributed their own sources of nutrition information to discussions, using their own knowledge networks to teach and share information. Nutrition professionals need to understand the principles of connectivist learning behaviours in order to effectively engage the public.

摘要

由于互联网的普及,人们现在几乎可以随时获取营养信息,而这些信息在科学完整性和提供者专业知识方面存在差异。了解公众的信息搜索行为对于提供合理的营养建议至关重要。本研究旨在确定营养重点的大规模开放在线课程 (MOOC) 中的学习者会向谁寻求营养信息,以及他们如何讨论他们找到的信息。一种多方法方法探索了 MOOC 学习者的信息搜索和共享行为。总结性内容分析和探索性、归纳性、定性方法分析了 MOOC 论坛中的学习者帖子。在 476 个帖子中,学习者报告的大多数(58.6%)营养信息来源来自网站。营养信息提供者最常见的是(34%)没有可识别的营养资格的高等教育人员;19%没有可识别的作者信息,只有 5%来自营养专业人员。确定的定性主题表明,学习者使用营养信息进行学习、教学和分享营养信息。与连通主义学习理论一致,学习者将自己的营养信息来源贡献到讨论中,利用自己的知识网络进行教学和信息共享。营养专业人员需要了解连通主义学习行为的原则,以便有效地吸引公众。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/a32fd2999909/nutrients-12-00750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/8031db6ab79a/nutrients-12-00750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/4cfa7b6230c5/nutrients-12-00750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/a32fd2999909/nutrients-12-00750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/8031db6ab79a/nutrients-12-00750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/4cfa7b6230c5/nutrients-12-00750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8b/7146568/a32fd2999909/nutrients-12-00750-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the Internet: Nutrition Information-Seeking Behaviours of Lay People Enrolled in a Massive Online Nutrition Course.利用互联网:参加大规模在线营养课程的普通民众的营养信息搜索行为。
Nutrients. 2020 Mar 12;12(3):750. doi: 10.3390/nu12030750.
2
Promoting Evidence Based Nutrition Education Across the World in a Competitive Space: Delivering a Massive Open Online Course.在竞争激烈的环境中推动全球循证营养教育:开设大规模在线开放课程。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 28;12(2):344. doi: 10.3390/nu12020344.
3
Inflaming Public Interest: A Qualitative Study of Adult Learners' Perceptions on Nutrition and Inflammation.激发公众兴趣:成人学习者对营养与炎症关系认知的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 28;12(2):345. doi: 10.3390/nu12020345.
4
Exploring Impacts of a Nutrition-Focused Massive Open Online Course.探索营养为重点的大规模在线公开课程的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 6;14(18):3680. doi: 10.3390/nu14183680.
5
Relationship between participants' level of education and engagement in their completion of the Understanding Dementia Massive Open Online Course.参与者的教育水平与其完成“了解痴呆症”大规模开放在线课程的参与度之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 26;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0344-z.
6
Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis.大规模在线开放课程参与的益处:演绎主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 8;22(7):e17318. doi: 10.2196/17318.
7
Equipping Learners to Evaluate Online Health Care Resources: Longitudinal Study of Learning Design Strategies in a Health Care Massive Open Online Course.让学习者具备评估在线医疗资源的能力:对一门医疗大规模开放在线课程中学习设计策略的纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 26;22(2):e15177. doi: 10.2196/15177.
8
Who can benefit more from massive open online courses? A prospective cohort study.谁能从大规模开放在线课程中获益更多?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Real-world evidence for postgraduate students and professionals in healthcare: protocol for the design of a blended massive open online course.真实世界证据在医疗保健领域的研究生和专业人员中的应用:混合式大规模开放在线课程设计的方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 4;8(9):e025196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025196.
10
Study design and protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of a UK massive open online course (MOOC) on quality improvement in healthcare.英国大规模在线开放课程(MOOC)医疗质量改进综合评估的研究设计和方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e031973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031973.

引用本文的文献

1
ChatGPT and human dietitian responses to diet-related questions on an online Q&A platform: A comparative study.ChatGPT与人类营养师在在线问答平台上对饮食相关问题的回答:一项比较研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 21;11:20552076251361381. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361381. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
The Role of Social Media in Food Product Choices Made by Polish Consumers.社交媒体在波兰消费者食品选择中的作用。
Nutrients. 2025 May 26;17(11):1801. doi: 10.3390/nu17111801.
3
Exposure to and Engagement With Digital Psychoeducational Content and Community Related to Maternal Mental Health by Perinatal Persons and Mothers: Protocol for a Web-Based Survey With Optional Follow-Up.

本文引用的文献

1
Inflaming Public Interest: A Qualitative Study of Adult Learners' Perceptions on Nutrition and Inflammation.激发公众兴趣:成人学习者对营养与炎症关系认知的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 28;12(2):345. doi: 10.3390/nu12020345.
2
Promoting Evidence Based Nutrition Education Across the World in a Competitive Space: Delivering a Massive Open Online Course.在竞争激烈的环境中推动全球循证营养教育:开设大规模在线开放课程。
Nutrients. 2020 Jan 28;12(2):344. doi: 10.3390/nu12020344.
3
Nutrition in medical education: a systematic review.医学教育中的营养:系统评价。
围产期女性和母亲接触及参与与孕产妇心理健康相关的数字心理教育内容和社区:基于网络调查及可选随访的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 30;14:e64075. doi: 10.2196/64075.
4
Content quality versus sharing practices on social media: a cross-sectional analysis of nutrition information on Twitter.社交媒体上的内容质量与分享行为:关于推特上营养信息的横断面分析
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Apr 10;28(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000461.
5
Comparison of the Accuracy, Completeness, Reproducibility, and Consistency of Different AI Chatbots in Providing Nutritional Advice: An Exploratory Study.不同人工智能聊天机器人提供营养建议的准确性、完整性、可重复性和一致性比较:一项探索性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 20;13(24):7810. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247810.
6
Nutrition information and the menopause: An online survey of perimenopausal and menopausal women.营养信息与更年期:一项针对围绝经期和绝经后女性的在线调查。
Post Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;31(2):65-72. doi: 10.1177/20533691241308370. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
7
Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence.网页上提供的饮食建议的内容准确性和可读性:系统评价证据。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Feb;38(1):e13395. doi: 10.1111/jhn.13395.
8
Mediterranean Diet Information on TikTok and Implications for Digital Health Promotion Research: Social Media Content Analysis.TikTok上的地中海饮食信息及其对数字健康促进研究的启示:社交媒体内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 19;8:e51094. doi: 10.2196/51094.
9
Prevalence and Correlates of Dietary and Nutrition Information Seeking Through Various Web-Based and Offline Media Sources Among Japanese Adults: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study.日本成年人通过各种网络和线下媒体资源寻求饮食和营养信息的流行情况及相关因素:基于网络的横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Feb 14;10:e54805. doi: 10.2196/54805.
10
Comparison of Answers between ChatGPT and Human Dieticians to Common Nutrition Questions.ChatGPT与人类营养师对常见营养问题的回答比较。
J Nutr Metab. 2023 Nov 7;2023:5548684. doi: 10.1155/2023/5548684. eCollection 2023.
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Sep;3(9):e379-e389. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30171-8.
4
Real-world data and the patient perspective: the PROmise of social media?真实世界数据和患者视角:社交媒体的 PRO (承诺)?
BMC Med. 2019 Jan 16;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1247-8.
5
Social media in dietetics: Insights into use and user networks.社交媒体在营养学中的应用:使用情况和用户网络洞察。
Nutr Diet. 2019 Sep;76(4):414-420. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12488. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
6
Food Trends and Popular Nutrition Advice Online - Implications for Public Health.网络上的食品趋势与流行的营养建议——对公共卫生的影响
Online J Public Health Inform. 2018 Sep 21;10(2):e213. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.9306. eCollection 2018.
7
Fasting and weight-loss restrictive diet practices among 2,700 cancer survivors: results from the NutriNet-Santé cohort.2700 名癌症幸存者的禁食和减肥限制饮食实践:NutriNet-Santé 队列研究结果。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Dec 1;143(11):2687-2697. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31646. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Containing health myths in the age of viral misinformation.在病毒式错误信息时代包含健康谣言。
CMAJ. 2018 May 14;190(19):E578. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180543.
9
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 Standards of Practice and Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Diabetes Care.美国营养学会和饮食学会:《注册营养师在糖尿病照护中的实践标准和专业表现标准(胜任、熟练、精通)(2017 修订版)》。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):932-946.e48. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.03.007.
10
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Revised 2017 Standards of Practice and Standards of Professional Performance for Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (Competent, Proficient, and Expert) in Oncology Nutrition.美国营养与饮食学会:《注册营养师在肿瘤营养实践中的 2017 版标准和专业表现标准(胜任、熟练和精通)》修订版。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;118(4):736-748.e42. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.01.012.