• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测重症监护中不良事件的时间模式检测:急性肾损伤案例研究

Temporal Pattern Detection to Predict Adverse Events in Critical Care: Case Study With Acute Kidney Injury.

作者信息

Morid Mohammad Amin, Sheng Olivia R Liu, Del Fiol Guilherme, Facelli Julio C, Bray Bruce E, Abdelrahman Samir

机构信息

Department of Information Systems and Analytics, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.

Department of Operations and Information Systems, David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 17;8(3):e14272. doi: 10.2196/14272.

DOI:10.2196/14272
PMID:32181753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7109618/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than 20% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) develop an adverse event (AE). No previous study has leveraged patients' data to extract the temporal features using their structural temporal patterns, that is, trends.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to improve AE prediction methods by using structural temporal pattern detection that captures global and local temporal trends and to demonstrate these improvements in the detection of acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care dataset, containing 22,542 patients, we extracted both global and local trends using structural pattern detection methods to predict AKI (ie, binary prediction). Classifiers were built on 17 input features consisting of vital signs and laboratory test results using state-of-the-art models; the optimal classifier was selected for comparisons with previous approaches. The classifier with structural pattern detection features was compared with two baseline classifiers that used different temporal feature extraction approaches commonly used in the literature: (1) symbolic temporal pattern detection, which is the most common approach for multivariate time series classification; and (2) the last recorded value before the prediction point, which is the most common approach to extract temporal data in the AKI prediction literature. Moreover, we assessed the individual contribution of global and local trends. Classifier performance was measured in terms of accuracy (primary outcome), area under the curve, and F-measure. For all experiments, we employed 20-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

Random forest was the best classifier using structural temporal pattern detection. The accuracy of the classifier with local and global trend features was significantly higher than that while using symbolic temporal pattern detection and the last recorded value (81.3% vs 70.6% vs 58.1%; P<.001). Excluding local or global features reduced the accuracy to 74.4% or 78.1%, respectively (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Classifiers using features obtained from structural temporal pattern detection significantly improved the prediction of AKI onset in ICU patients over two baselines based on common previous approaches. The proposed method is a generalizable approach to predict AEs in critical care that may be used to help clinicians intervene in a timely manner to prevent or mitigate AEs.

摘要

背景

入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中有超过20%会发生不良事件(AE)。以前没有研究利用患者数据,通过其结构时间模式(即趋势)来提取时间特征。

目的

本研究旨在通过使用捕获全局和局部时间趋势的结构时间模式检测来改进AE预测方法,并在急性肾损伤(AKI)检测中证明这些改进。

方法

使用包含22542名患者的重症监护医学信息数据库(Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care)数据集,我们使用结构模式检测方法提取全局和局部趋势以预测AKI(即二元预测)。使用最先进的模型,基于由生命体征和实验室检查结果组成的17个输入特征构建分类器;选择最优分类器与以前的方法进行比较。将具有结构模式检测特征的分类器与两个基线分类器进行比较,这两个基线分类器使用文献中常用的不同时间特征提取方法:(1)符号时间模式检测,这是多变量时间序列分类最常用的方法;(2)预测点之前的最后记录值,这是AKI预测文献中提取时间数据最常用的方法。此外,我们评估了全局和局部趋势的个体贡献。分类器性能通过准确性(主要结果)、曲线下面积和F值来衡量。对于所有实验,我们采用20折交叉验证。

结果

随机森林是使用结构时间模式检测的最佳分类器。具有局部和全局趋势特征的分类器的准确性显著高于使用符号时间模式检测和最后记录值时的准确性(81.3%对70.6%对58.1%;P<0.001)。排除局部或全局特征分别将准确性降低到74.4%或78.1%(P<0.001)。

结论

与基于以前常用方法的两个基线相比,使用从结构时间模式检测获得的特征的分类器显著改善了ICU患者AKI发作的预测。所提出的方法是一种可推广的预测危重症中AE的方法,可用于帮助临床医生及时进行干预以预防或减轻AE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/2e4078e1156e/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/63270a796647/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/9cbf28112af3/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/bd39607f4a4c/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/1978449470a2/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/6f6f5346461a/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/95b43582779d/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/2e4078e1156e/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/63270a796647/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/9cbf28112af3/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/bd39607f4a4c/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/1978449470a2/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/6f6f5346461a/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/95b43582779d/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/7109618/2e4078e1156e/medinform_v8i3e14272_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal Pattern Detection to Predict Adverse Events in Critical Care: Case Study With Acute Kidney Injury.用于预测重症监护中不良事件的时间模式检测:急性肾损伤案例研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 17;8(3):e14272. doi: 10.2196/14272.
2
Learning hidden patterns from patient multivariate time series data using convolutional neural networks: A case study of healthcare cost prediction.使用卷积神经网络从患者多变量时间序列数据中学习隐藏模式:以医疗保健成本预测为例。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Nov;111:103565. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103565. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Predicting Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay and Mortality Using Patient Vital Signs: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation.利用患者生命体征预测重症监护病房住院时间和死亡率:机器学习模型的开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 5;9(5):e21347. doi: 10.2196/21347.
5
Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.机器学习算法在(放化疗)治疗结果预测中的应用:分类器的实证比较。
Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):3449-3459. doi: 10.1002/mp.12967. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
6
Decompensation in Critical Care: Early Prediction of Acute Heart Failure Onset.重症监护中的失代偿:急性心力衰竭发作的早期预测
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Aug 7;8(8):e19892. doi: 10.2196/19892.
7
Utilizing imbalanced electronic health records to predict acute kidney injury by ensemble learning and time series model.利用不平衡的电子健康记录通过集成学习和时间序列模型预测急性肾损伤。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01245-4.
8
Significance of platelets in the early warning of new-onset AKI in the ICU by using supervise learning: a retrospective analysis.应用监督学习的血小板在 ICU 新发 AKI 早期预警中的意义:一项回顾性分析。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2194433. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2194433.
9
A Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure.一种基于机器学习的充血性心力衰竭患者急性肾损伤预测模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 4;9:842873. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842873. eCollection 2022.
10
Analysis of the Impact of Medical Features and Risk Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury for Critical Patients Using Temporal Electronic Health Record Data With Attention-Based Neural Network.使用基于注意力的神经网络和时间电子健康记录数据分析急性肾损伤的医学特征及对危重症患者的风险预测影响
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 4;8:658665. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.658665. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal Rule Mining for Enhanced Risk Pattern Extraction: A Case Study with Acute Kidney Injury.用于增强风险模式提取的时间规则挖掘:急性肾损伤案例研究
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:115-123. eCollection 2025.
2
Identifying risk factors for Alzheimer's disease from multivariate longitudinal clinical data using temporal pattern mining.使用时间模式挖掘从多变量纵向临床数据中识别阿尔茨海默病的风险因素。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2025 Feb 17;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-06018-8.
3
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated Continuous Acute Kidney Injury Prediction and Surveillance: A Random Forest Model.自动化连续急性肾损伤预测和监测:随机森林模型。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 May;94(5):783-792. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.009.
2
Healthcare cost prediction: Leveraging fine-grain temporal patterns.医疗保健成本预测:利用细粒度的时间模式。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Mar;91:103113. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103113. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
Predicting Inpatient Acute Kidney Injury over Different Time Horizons: How Early and Accurate?预测不同时间范围内的住院患者急性肾损伤:多早且多准确?
用于预测脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤重症患者死亡率的机器学习模型:一项系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;14(15):1594. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14151594.
4
A deep learning approach for acute liver failure prediction with combined fully connected and convolutional neural networks.基于全连接和卷积神经网络融合的深度学习急性肝衰竭预测方法。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(S1):555-564. doi: 10.3233/THC-248048.
5
Machine learning clinical prediction models for acute kidney injury: the impact of baseline creatinine on prediction efficacy.机器学习在急性肾损伤临床预测模型中的应用:基线肌酐对预测效能的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02306-0.
6
Machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and critical appraisal.用于预测急性肾损伤的机器学习模型:系统评价与批判性评估
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Aug 2;15(12):2266-2280. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac181. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Application of Machine Learning in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Settings Using MIMIC Dataset: Systematic Review.使用MIMIC数据集的机器学习在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中的应用:系统评价。
Informatics (MDPI). 2021 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.3390/informatics8010016. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
8
Has the Flood Entered the Basement? A Systematic Literature Review about Machine Learning in Laboratory Medicine.洪水已侵入地下室了吗?关于检验医学中机器学习的系统文献综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 22;11(2):372. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020372.
9
Promises of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology and Transplantation.大数据与人工智能在肾脏病学和移植领域的前景
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 13;9(4):1107. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041107.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:565-574. eCollection 2017.
4
Consistent discovery of frequent interval-based temporal patterns in chronic patients' data.在慢性患者数据中一致发现频繁基于区间的时间模式。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Prognosis of Clinical Outcomes with Temporal Patterns and Experiences with One Class Feature Selection.具有时间模式的临床结果预后及单类特征选择的经验
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2017 May-Jun;14(3):555-563. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2016.2591539. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
6
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.MIMIC-III,一个免费获取的重症监护数据库。
Sci Data. 2016 May 24;3:160035. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.35.
7
Investigating Adverse Event Free Admissions in Medicare Inpatients as a Patient Safety Indicator.将医疗保险住院患者的无不良事件入院情况作为患者安全指标进行调查。
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):910-915. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001792.
8
Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults.住院老年人急性肾损伤的预测与检测模型
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Mar 29;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0277-4.
9
Utilizing electronic health records to predict acute kidney injury risk and outcomes: workgroup statements from the 15(th) ADQI Consensus Conference.利用电子健康记录预测急性肾损伤风险及预后:第15届急性透析质量倡议(ADQI)共识会议工作组声明
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016 Feb 26;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s40697-016-0099-4. eCollection 2016.
10
Classification of clinically useful sentences in clinical evidence resources.临床证据资源中临床有用句子的分类。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 13.