Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;26(4):641-647. doi: 10.3201/eid2604.191629.
Ticks and tickborne diseases are increasingly problematic. There have been positive developments that should result in improved strategies and better tools to suppress ticks, reduce human tick bites, and roll back tickborne diseases. However, we equally need to address the question of who is responsible for implementing the solutions. The current model of individual responsibility for tick control evolved from a scenario in the 1990s focusing strongly on exposure to blacklegged ticks and Lyme disease spirochetes in peridomestic settings of the northeastern United States. Today, the threat posed by human-biting ticks is more widespread across the eastern United States, increasingly complex (multiple tick species and >10 notable tickborne pathogens), and, across tick species, more spatially diffuse (including backyards, neighborhood green spaces, and public recreation areas). To mitigate tick-associated negative societal effects, we must consider shifting the responsibility for tick control to include both individual persons and professionally staffed tick-management programs.
蜱虫和蜱传疾病的问题日益严重。已经有一些积极的进展,这应该会促使我们制定出更好的策略,以及更有效的工具来抑制蜱虫、减少人类被蜱虫叮咬,并控制蜱传疾病。然而,我们同样需要解决谁来负责实施这些解决方案的问题。目前,个人负责蜱虫控制的模式源于 20 世纪 90 年代的一个情景,当时重点关注美国东北部的家庭周边环境中接触黑腿蜱和莱姆螺旋体。如今,在美国东部,被人类叮咬的蜱虫的威胁更加广泛,而且越来越复杂(多种蜱虫种类和超过 10 种显著的蜱传病原体),并且在不同的蜱虫种类中,分布范围也更加分散(包括后院、邻里绿地和公共娱乐区)。为了减轻与蜱虫相关的负面社会影响,我们必须考虑将蜱虫控制的责任扩大到包括个人和有专业人员配备的蜱虫管理项目。