Suppr超能文献

用于马匹的Element即时检验血气分析仪的评估。

Evaluation of the Element point-of-care blood gas analyzer for use in horses.

作者信息

Krueger Clarisa R, Hackett Eileen S, Hess Ann M, Mama Khursheed R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.

Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.

出版信息

J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2020 May;30(3):279-285. doi: 10.1111/vec.12950. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Element point-of-care (POC) portable blood gas analyzer with a laboratory-based bench-top reference analyzer using whole blood samples obtained from horses presenting to a referral center with various disorders in order to determine agreement between these analyzers.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a university teaching hospital at moderate altitude.

ANIMALS

One hundred paired samples from 80 horses >1 year of age were collected after obtaining informed client consent. Fifty paired samples were from patients admitted for elective procedures and considered to be healthy, and 50 paired samples were emergency admissions and considered to be critically ill.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Paired whole blood samples were evaluated on both the Element POC and Radiometer ABL 800 FLEX analyzers simultaneously, and results were compared. Pearson correlation coefficients between analyzers were calculated. To assess agreement, scatter and Bland-Altman plots were evaluated, and mean difference and 95% limits of agreement were calculated for each analyte. Correlation was either good (0.8-0.92) or excellent (>0.93) for the majority of analytes. All analytes apart from hemoglobin had acceptable agreement, with ≥80% of individual results within agreement targets. Precision targets were acceptable for most analytes, with partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO ) and calcium (Ca ) exceeding precision targets.

CONCLUSIONS

The portable Element POC system had acceptable agreement with the ABL 800 FLEX bench-top analyzer currently in use at the study center when evaluating the majority of analytes from equine whole blood samples.

摘要

目的

使用从转诊中心患有各种疾病的马匹采集的全血样本,将Element即时检验(POC)便携式血气分析仪与基于实验室的台式参考分析仪进行比较,以确定这些分析仪之间的一致性。

设计

前瞻性临床研究。

地点

该研究在海拔适中的大学教学医院进行。

动物

在获得客户知情同意后,采集了来自80匹1岁以上马匹的100对样本。50对样本来自因择期手术入院且被认为健康的患者,50对样本来自急诊入院且被认为患有危重病的患者。

测量和主要结果

同时在Element POC分析仪和Radiometer ABL 800 FLEX分析仪上对配对的全血样本进行评估,并比较结果。计算分析仪之间的Pearson相关系数。为评估一致性,对散点图和Bland-Altman图进行评估,并计算每种分析物的平均差异和95%一致性界限。大多数分析物的相关性良好(0.8 - 0.92)或极佳(>0.93)。除血红蛋白外,所有分析物的一致性均可接受,≥80%的个体结果在一致性目标范围内。大多数分析物的精密度目标可接受,二氧化碳分压(pCO₂)和钙(Ca²⁺)超出精密度目标。

结论

在评估马全血样本中的大多数分析物时,便携式Element POC系统与研究中心目前使用的ABL 800 FLEX台式分析仪具有可接受的一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验