Atkinson M, Robertson C S
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Gut. 1988 Dec;29(12):1721-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.12.1721.
The response to treatment of peptic oesophageal stricture associated with columnar lined (Barretts) oesophagus (CLO) has been compared with that in peptic stricture without CLO. Benign oesophageal stricture was present in 23 (41%) of 56 patients consecutive with CLO. In 18 the stricture lay at the squamocolumnar mucosal junction and was associated with reflux oesophagitis, in five it was situated in the columnar lined segment and in four of these it was known to have been preceded by a chronic ulcer at the site of the stricture. Controls were an age and sex matched group of patients with benign stricture related to reflux oesophagitis unassociated with columnar epithelialisation. CLO associated strictures involving squamous mucosa were situated significantly (p less than 0.01) higher in the oesophagus than non-CLO strictures. The response to endoscopic dilatation and active medical treatment was significantly better, as judged by the need for subsequent dilatation (p less than 0.01) in the CLO than in the non-CLO group. It is concluded that associated columnar epithelialisation of the oesophagus is not in itself an indication for antireflux surgery in the management of benign stricture and these usually respond well to dilatation and medical treatment.
对柱状上皮化生(巴雷特)食管(CLO)相关的消化性食管狭窄与无CLO的消化性狭窄的治疗反应进行了比较。在56例连续患有CLO的患者中,23例(41%)存在良性食管狭窄。18例狭窄位于鳞状上皮与柱状上皮黏膜交界处,与反流性食管炎相关;5例位于柱状上皮化生段,其中4例已知在狭窄部位之前有慢性溃疡。对照组是年龄和性别匹配的一组患者,他们患有与反流性食管炎相关的良性狭窄,但与柱状上皮化生无关。涉及鳞状黏膜的CLO相关狭窄在食管中的位置明显(p<0.01)高于非CLO狭窄。从后续扩张的必要性判断,CLO组对内镜扩张和积极药物治疗的反应明显优于非CLO组(p<0.01)。结论是,食管相关的柱状上皮化生本身并不是良性狭窄管理中抗反流手术的指征,这些狭窄通常对扩张和药物治疗反应良好。