Refractories, Ceramics and Building Materials Department, National Research Centre, 33El Bohouth St (Former EL Tahrirst)-Dokki, P.O. 12622, Giza, Egypt; Department of Chemical Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, Leicestershire, UK.
Refractories, Ceramics and Building Materials Department, National Research Centre, 33El Bohouth St (Former EL Tahrirst)-Dokki, P.O. 12622, Giza, Egypt.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 May;110:110716. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110716. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Significant advances have been made in the field of tissue engineering (TE), especially in the synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds for replacing damaged tissues and organs in laboratory conditions. However, the gaps in knowledge in exploiting these techniques in preclinical trials and beyond and, in particular, in practical scenarios (e.g., replacing real body organs) have not been discussed well in the existing literature. Furthermore, it is observed in the literature that while new techniques for the synthesis of 3D TE scaffold have been developed, some of the earlier techniques are still being used. This implies that the advantages offered by a more recent and advanced technique as compared to the earlier ones are not obvious, and these should be discussed in detail. For example, one needs to be aware of the reason, if any, behind the superiority of traditional electrospinning technique over recent advances in 3D printing technique for the production of 3D scaffolds given the popularity of the former over the latter, indicated by the number of publications in the respective areas. Keeping these points in mind, this review aims to demonstrate the ongoing trend in TE based on the scaffold fabrication techniques, focusing mostly, on the two most widely used techniques, namely, electrospinning and 3D printing, with a special emphasis on preclinical trials and beyond. In this context, the advantages, disadvantages, flexibilities and limitations of the relevant techniques (electrospinner and 3D printer) are discussed. The paper also critically analyzes the applicability, restrictions, and future demands of these techniques in TE including their applications in generating whole body organs. It is concluded that combining these knowledge gaps with the existing body of knowledge on the preparation of laboratory scale 3D scaffolds, would deliver a much better understanding in the future for scientists who are interested in these techniques.
在组织工程(TE)领域已经取得了重大进展,特别是在合成三维(3D)支架以替代实验室条件下受损组织和器官方面。然而,在利用这些技术进行临床前试验和更广泛的应用方面,包括在实际场景中(例如,替代真实身体器官),现有文献中并没有很好地讨论这些技术的知识差距。此外,文献中观察到,虽然已经开发出用于合成 3D TE 支架的新技术,但仍在使用一些早期技术。这意味着,与早期技术相比,较新和先进技术所提供的优势并不明显,这些优势应该详细讨论。例如,如果有的话,在生产 3D 支架方面,传统静电纺丝技术优于最近的 3D 打印技术,那么需要注意原因,因为前者比后者更受欢迎,这一点可以从各自领域的出版物数量上看出。考虑到这些要点,本综述旨在展示基于支架制造技术的 TE 目前的趋势,主要集中在两种最广泛使用的技术,即静电纺丝和 3D 打印技术,并特别强调临床前试验和更广泛的应用。在这种情况下,讨论了相关技术(静电纺丝器和 3D 打印机)的优缺点、灵活性和局限性。本文还批判性地分析了这些技术在 TE 中的适用性、限制和未来需求,包括它们在生成全身器官中的应用。结论是,将这些知识差距与实验室规模 3D 支架制备的现有知识体系相结合,将为对这些技术感兴趣的科学家提供更好的未来理解。