From the Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, CREATIS, Saint-Etienne, France (K.M., M.V., W.R., A.C., P.C.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne, CREATIS UMR 5020, INSERM U1206, Avenue Albert Raimond, 42000 Saint Etienne Cedex, France (M.V., P.C.); Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM 1407, Lyon, France (N.M.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Saint Etienne, Université Jean Monnet, Saint Etienne, France (K.I.).
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):542-549. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192186. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
Background After acute myocardial infarction (AMI), reperfusion injury is associated with microvascular lesions and myocardial edema. Purpose To evaluate the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification compared with T1 and T2 values in the detection of acute myocardial injury. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from June 2016 to November 2018, participants without a history of heart failure or cardiomyopathy were enrolled after undergoing reperfusion for their first AMI. Quantitative T1 and T2 mapping were performed with a 1.5-T MRI scanner and compared with a fast free-breathing acquisition technique for ADC mapping (approximate duration, 3 minutes; five slices; spin-echo cardiac diffusion acquisition; values, 0 and 200 sec/mm; six diffusion-encoding directions; five repetitions). Quantitative ADC and unenhanced T1 and T2 values were compared in infarct, border, and remote regions by using Welch analysis of variance with Games-Howell post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. Results Thirty-four participants with AMI underwent MRI an average of 5 days ± 1.9 (standard deviation) after reperfusion. Mean ADC was markedly high in the infarcted regions (2.32 × 10 mm/sec; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28, 2.36) and moderately high in the border regions (1.91 ×10 mm/sec; 95% CI: 1.89, 1.94; < .001). In remote regions, mean ADC (1.62 ×10 mm/sec; 95% CI: 1.59, 1.64) was comparable to that measured in vivo in healthy volunteers. Within the same regions of interest, although the measures showed similar trends in infarct and remote regions for T1 (mean, 1332 mec [95% CI: 1296, 1368] vs 1045 msec [95% CI: 1034, 1056]; < .001) and T2 (72 msec [95% CI: 69, 75] vs 50 msec [95% CI: 49, 51]; < .001), the magnitude of the differences among regions was greater when using ADC. Normalized signal differences between infarct and remote regions showed that diffusion-weighted MRI depicted edema 5.1 ( < .001) and 3.5 ( < .001) times greater than did T1 and T2 maps, respectively. Conclusion Multislice cardiac diffusion-weighted images could be acquired in those with acute myocardial injury. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient mapping showed greater differences among remote regions and lesions than did T1 or T2 mapping. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Lloyd and Farris in this issue.
背景 在急性心肌梗死(AMI)后,再灌注损伤与微血管损伤和心肌水肿有关。目的 评估表观扩散系数(ADC)定量与 T1 和 T2 值在检测急性心肌损伤中的表现。材料与方法 本前瞻性研究于 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 11 月进行,纳入首次接受 AMI 再灌注治疗且无心力衰竭或心肌病病史的患者。采用 1.5-T MRI 扫描仪进行定量 T1 和 T2 映射,并与快速自由呼吸采集技术(ADC 映射)进行比较(大约持续时间为 3 分钟;5 个层面;自旋回波心脏扩散采集;b 值分别为 0 和 200 sec/mm;6 个扩散编码方向;重复 5 次)。采用 Welch 方差分析和 Games-Howell 事后检验进行组间比较,比较梗死、边缘和远隔区域的定量 ADC 和未增强 T1 和 T2 值。结果 34 名 AMI 患者在再灌注后平均 5 天±1.9(标准差)进行 MRI。在梗死区,平均 ADC 明显升高(2.32×10mm/sec;95%置信区间[CI]:2.28,2.36),在边缘区中度升高(1.91×10mm/sec;95%CI:1.89,1.94;<0.001)。在远隔区,平均 ADC(1.62×10mm/sec;95%CI:1.59,1.64)与体内健康志愿者的测量值相当。在相同的感兴趣区域内,尽管 T1 在梗死和远隔区的测量值呈相似趋势(平均值分别为 1332 mec[95%CI:1296,1368]和 1045 msec[95%CI:1034,1056];<0.001)和 T2(72 msec[95%CI:69,75]和 50 msec[95%CI:49,51];<0.001),但 ADC 测量值的区域间差异更大。梗死和远隔区之间的归一化信号差异表明,弥散加权 MRI 显示水肿分别比 T1 和 T2 图大 5.1(<0.001)和 3.5(<0.001)倍。结论 可以在急性心肌损伤患者中采集多层面心脏弥散加权图像。定量表观扩散系数图在远隔区和病变区之间显示出比 T1 或 T2 图更大的差异。