Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 25;15(3):e0230552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230552. eCollection 2020.
Edible insects are increasingly being considered as sustainable alternatives to fish and soybean meals in animal feed because of their high nutritional quality and environmental benefits. However, successful introduction of a new product to the market depends on the target user's acceptance. Thus, evaluating the potential demand of insect-based feeds would provide relevant information for policy development. The present study assessed farmers' knowledge on edible insects as feed, their acceptance of integrating insect meals in animal feeds and willingness to pay (WTP) for insect-based feed (IBF) using a contingent valuation method. A household survey was conducted among 957 randomly selected farmers including: 409 poultry, 241 fish and 307 pig farmers in four counties in Kenya. Results of the study reveal that over 70 and 80% of poultry and fish farmers, respectively, are aware that insects can be used as a feed ingredient. In addition, over 60 and 75% of poultry and fish farmers, respectively, consider insects as a good component of feed. Poultry, pig and fish farmers interviewed accepted and showed willingness to pay for IBF. Regression analysis indicated that age, gender, education, marital status, distance to feed trader, awareness of insects as feed, attitude towards insects, acceptance of insect species, availability of agricultural inputs, use of commercial feeds, availability of training and market information had a significant influence on the WTP for IBF. Therefore, increased extension services to educate famers on the nutritional benefits of insect meals in animal feeds and existing market opportunities are expected to improve farmers' attitude towards utilization and consequently enhance WTP for IBF, which in return would significantly reduce the existing pressure on conventional fishmeal feed resources. Our findings provide the first insights into the market opportunities of including insect meals in the animal feed value chain in Kenya.
食用昆虫因其高营养价值和环境效益,正越来越多地被视为鱼类和大豆粉在动物饲料中的可持续替代品。然而,新产品要成功推向市场,取决于目标用户的接受程度。因此,评估昆虫饲料的潜在需求将为政策制定提供相关信息。本研究采用条件价值评估法评估了肯尼亚四个县 957 名随机抽取的农民对食用昆虫作为饲料的了解程度、他们对在动物饲料中添加昆虫粉的接受程度以及对昆虫饲料(IBF)的支付意愿(WTP)。这项研究包括 409 名家禽养殖户、241 名鱼类养殖户和 307 名猪养殖户。结果表明,超过 70%和 80%的家禽和鱼类养殖户分别意识到昆虫可以用作饲料成分。此外,超过 60%和 75%的家禽和鱼类养殖户分别认为昆虫是一种很好的饲料成分。接受采访的家禽、猪和鱼类养殖户都接受并表示愿意支付 IBF。回归分析表明,年龄、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、与饲料交易商的距离、对昆虫作为饲料的认识、对昆虫的态度、对昆虫种类的接受程度、农业投入的可用性、商业饲料的使用、培训和市场信息的可用性对 IBF 的 WTP 有显著影响。因此,增加推广服务,向农民传授昆虫粉在动物饲料中的营养价值和现有市场机会,有望改善农民对利用昆虫粉的态度,从而提高对 IBF 的支付意愿,这反过来又将显著减轻对传统鱼粉饲料资源的现有压力。我们的研究结果首次提供了肯尼亚将昆虫粉纳入动物饲料价值链的市场机会的见解。