• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Micronucleus Assay of Buccal Mucosa Cells in Waterpipe (Hookah) Smokers: A Cytologic Study.水烟吸食者颊黏膜细胞的微核试验:一项细胞学研究
Iran J Pathol. 2020 Spring;15(2):75-80. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.101701.2010. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Micronucleus assay of buccal mucosa cells in smokers with the history of smoking less and more than 10 years.吸烟史少于10年和超过10年的吸烟者口腔黏膜细胞微核试验
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2012 Oct-Dec;55(4):433-8. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.107774.
3
Micronucleus Assay in Waterpipe Tobacco and Cigarette Smokers: A Comparative Study.水烟和香烟吸烟者的微核试验:一项比较研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):101-107.
4
Comparison of Genotoxic Effect in Buccal Exfoliated Cells between Cigarette and Waterpipe Smokers.香烟与水烟吸食者口腔脱落细胞遗传毒性效应的比较。
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(5):471-476. doi: 10.1159/000506893. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Comparison of Repair Index in Cigarette and Waterpipe Smokers: A Bio-Monitoring Assessment Using Human Exfoliated Buccal Mucosa Cells.香烟和水烟吸烟者修复指数的比较:一项使用人脱落颊黏膜细胞的生物监测评估。
Int J Prev Med. 2022 Feb 23;13:27. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_10_20. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of staining procedures on the results of micronucleus assay in the exfoliated buccal mucosal cells of smokers and nonsmokers: A pilot study.染色程序对吸烟者和非吸烟者脱落颊黏膜细胞微核试验结果的影响:一项初步研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(2):372-376. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.157351.
7
Genotoxicity of waterpipe smoking in young adults from Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那萨拉热窝年轻人水烟吸食的遗传毒性。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 8;9(6):e17073. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17073. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Comparison of Cytotoxic Effect of Cigarette and Waterpipe Smoking on Human Buccal Mucosa.香烟与水烟对人体颊黏膜细胞毒性作用的比较
Int J Prev Med. 2017 Dec 5;8:98. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_62_17. eCollection 2017.
9
Genotoxic effects of waterpipe smoking on the buccal mucosa cells.水烟吸食对颊黏膜细胞的遗传毒性作用。
Mutat Res. 2008 Aug-Sep;655(1-2):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.06.014.
10
Comparative Study of Micronuclei Count in Patients with Different Tobacco-related Habits using Exfoliated Buccal Epithelial Cells: A Tool for Assessment of Genotoxicity.使用脱落颊黏膜上皮细胞对不同烟草相关习惯患者微核计数的比较研究:一种评估遗传毒性的工具
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1076-1081.

引用本文的文献

1
Genotoxicity of waterpipe smoking in young adults from Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina.波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那萨拉热窝年轻人水烟吸食的遗传毒性。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 8;9(6):e17073. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17073. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smoking on buccal mucosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.香烟和水烟吸食对颊黏膜的细胞毒性和遗传毒性作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4):534-540. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_292_22. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
3
Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects of Waterpipe on Oral Health Status: Systematic review and meta-analysis.水烟管对口腔健康状况的细胞毒性和遗传毒性作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023 Feb;23(1):5-12. doi: 10.18295/squmj.6.2022.043. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
4
Cytomorphometric Analysis of Oral Buccal Mucosa of Dental Colleges' Students in Sulaimani City.苏莱曼尼亚市牙科学院学生口腔颊黏膜的细胞形态计量分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;13(2):234. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020234.
5
Re: Evaluation of Micronuclei and Cytomorphometric Changes in Patients with Different Tobacco Related Habits Using Exfoliated Buccal Cells.回复:使用脱落颊细胞对不同烟草相关习惯患者的微核和细胞形态计量学变化进行评估
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Mar 1;23(3):755-757. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.755.
6
Karyoanomalic frequency assay during radiation therapy - A promising marker in the prognosis of oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.放射治疗期间的核异常频率测定——口腔和口咽癌预后的一个有前景的标志物。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Dec;10(12):4548-4552. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_948_21. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
7
Early Diagnosis of Oral Mucosal Alterations in Smokers and E-Cigarette Users Based on Micronuclei Count: A Cross-Sectional Study among Dental Students.基于微核计数的吸烟者和电子烟使用者口腔黏膜改变的早期诊断:一项针对牙科学生的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413246.
8
The adverse health effects of waterpipe smoking in adolescents and young adults: A narrative review.水烟吸食对青少年和年轻人的健康不良影响:一项叙述性综述。
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 Oct 22;19:81. doi: 10.18332/tid/142521. eCollection 2021.
9
Response to the Letter to Editor:" Is Micronucleus Assay Suitable for Cytogenetic Biomonitoring the Different Ways to Smoke? ".对编辑来信的回复:“微核试验是否适用于对不同吸烟方式进行细胞遗传学生物监测?”
Iran J Pathol. 2020 Fall;15(4):352-354. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.127517.2390. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Is Micronucleus Assay Suitable for Cytogenetic Biomonitoring the Different Ways to Smoke?微核试验是否适用于对不同吸烟方式进行细胞遗传学生物监测?
Iran J Pathol. 2020 Fall;15(4):351. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.125206.2370. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of Genotoxic Effects of Hookah Smoking by Micronucleus and Chromosome Aberration Methods.通过微核和染色体畸变方法测定水烟吸食的遗传毒性效应。
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Nov 21;22:4490-4494. doi: 10.12659/msm.898593.
2
Genotoxicity of waterpipe smoke in buccal cells and peripheral blood leukocytes as determined by comet assay.通过彗星试验测定水烟烟雾对颊细胞和外周血白细胞的遗传毒性。
Inhal Toxicol. 2014 Dec;26(14):891-6. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2014.970787. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
The global epidemiology of waterpipe smoking.水烟吸食的全球流行病学。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i3-i12. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051903. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Assessment of genotoxicity of waterpipe and cigarette smoking in lymphocytes using the sister-chromatid exchange assay: a comparative study.利用姐妹染色单体交换试验评估水烟和香烟烟雾在淋巴细胞中的遗传毒性:一项比较研究。
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2011 Apr;52(3):224-8. doi: 10.1002/em.20601. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
5
Micronuclei frequencies in peripheral blood and buccal exfoliated cells of young smokers and non-smokers.年轻吸烟者和非吸烟者外周血和口腔脱落细胞中的微核频率。
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2010 Jun;20(5):260-6. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2010.482962.
6
Waterpipe tobacco and cigarette smoking: direct comparison of toxicant exposure.水烟烟草与香烟吸烟:有毒物质暴露的直接比较。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.014.
7
Cytogenetic monitoring in human oral cancers and other oral pathology: the micronucleus test in exfoliated buccal cells.人类口腔癌及其他口腔病理学中的细胞遗传学监测:脱落颊黏膜细胞微核试验
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2009 Sep;19(6-7):427-33. doi: 10.1080/15376510903127530.
8
Genotoxic effects of waterpipe smoking on the buccal mucosa cells.水烟吸食对颊黏膜细胞的遗传毒性作用。
Mutat Res. 2008 Aug-Sep;655(1-2):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.06.014.
9
The micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for biomonitoring DNA damage: the HUMN project perspective on current status and knowledge gaps.人颊细胞微核试验作为生物监测DNA损伤的工具:人类微核项目对现状和知识空白的看法。
Mutat Res. 2008 Jul-Aug;659(1-2):93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
10
Waterpipe smoking and nicotine exposure: a review of the current evidence.水烟吸食与尼古丁暴露:当前证据综述
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Oct;9(10):987-94. doi: 10.1080/14622200701591591.

水烟吸食者颊黏膜细胞的微核试验:一项细胞学研究

Micronucleus Assay of Buccal Mucosa Cells in Waterpipe (Hookah) Smokers: A Cytologic Study.

作者信息

DehghanNezhad Mehdi, Jalayer Naderi Noushin, Semyari Hassan

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University.

出版信息

Iran J Pathol. 2020 Spring;15(2):75-80. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2020.101701.2010. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

DOI:10.30699/ijp.2020.101701.2010
PMID:32215022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7081765/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Micronucleus assay of buccal mucosa cells is a simple bio- monitoring method for diagnosing the genetic damages of toxic agents. The aim was to study the genotoxic effect of waterpipe smoking on buccal mucosa cells using micronucleus assay.

METHODS

This was a case control. A total of 30 male waterpipe smokers and 30 non-smokers were included in the study. The exfoliated buccal mucosa cells were scrapped using wooden spatula and were spread over glass slides. The mean number of micronuclei was determined using Feulgen-stained slides. The number of micronuclei per 1000 cells was calculated and compared between the two groups of smokers and non-smokers.

RESULTS

The mean number of micronuclei in waterpipe smokers and non-smokers was 1.94±0.39 and 1.680.35, respectively. The micronuclei count in waterpipe smokers was significantly higher than non-smokers (=0). The difference between the number of waterpipe smoking and micronuclei count was significantly different (=0).

CONCLUSION

The mean number of micronuclei in buccal mucosa cells of waterpipe smokers was significantly higher than non-smokers. The genotoxicity effect of waterpipe was dose-dependent.

摘要

背景与目的

颊黏膜细胞微核试验是一种用于诊断有毒物质遗传损伤的简单生物监测方法。本研究旨在通过微核试验研究水烟吸食对颊黏膜细胞的遗传毒性作用。

方法

本研究为病例对照研究。共纳入30名男性水烟吸食者和30名非吸烟者。用木质刮勺刮取脱落的颊黏膜细胞,铺展在载玻片上。使用Feulgen染色的玻片确定微核的平均数量。计算每1000个细胞中的微核数量,并在两组吸烟者和非吸烟者之间进行比较。

结果

水烟吸食者和非吸烟者的微核平均数量分别为1.94±0.39和1.68±0.35。水烟吸食者的微核计数显著高于非吸烟者(P=0)。水烟吸食次数与微核计数之间的差异具有显著性(P=0)。

结论

水烟吸食者颊黏膜细胞中的微核平均数量显著高于非吸烟者。水烟的遗传毒性作用呈剂量依赖性。