Suppr超能文献

用于检测麻疹特异性IgG的商用免疫测定法之间的定性差异。

Qualitative Variation among Commercial Immunoassays for Detection of Measles-Specific IgG.

作者信息

Latner Donald R, Sowers Sun B, Anthony Kiana, Colley Heather, Badeau Christine, Coates Jessica, Wong Phili, Fakile Yetunde, Interiano Cristina, Pannell Kevin B, Leung-Pineda Van, Patel Manisha M, Rota Paul A, Limbago Brandi M, Hickman Carole J

机构信息

National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

TJFACT, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00265-20.

Abstract

Measurement of measles virus-specific IgG is used to assess presumptive evidence of immunity among immunocompetent individuals with uncertain immune or vaccination status. False-negative test results may lead to unnecessary quarantine and exclusion from activities such as employment, education, and travel or result in unnecessary revaccination. In contrast, false-positive results may fail to identify susceptible individuals and promote spread of disease by those who are exposed and unprotected. To better understand the performance characteristics of tests to detect measles IgG, we compared five widely used, commercially available measles IgG test platforms using a set of 223 well-characterized serum samples. Measles virus neutralizing antibodies were also measured by plaque reduction neutralization, the gold standard method, and compared to IgG test results. Discrepant results were observed for samples in the low-positive ranges of the most sensitive tests, but there was good agreement across platforms for IgG-negative sera and for samples with intermediate to high levels of IgG. False-negative test results occurred in approximately 11% of sera, which had low levels of neutralizing antibody.

摘要

测量麻疹病毒特异性IgG用于评估免疫功能正常但免疫或疫苗接种状况不确定的个体的推定免疫证据。假阴性检测结果可能导致不必要的隔离以及被排除在就业、教育和旅行等活动之外,或者导致不必要的再次接种。相比之下,假阳性结果可能无法识别易感个体,并促使那些暴露且未受保护的人传播疾病。为了更好地了解检测麻疹IgG的检测方法的性能特征,我们使用一组223份特征明确的血清样本,比较了五个广泛使用的、市售的麻疹IgG检测平台。还通过蚀斑减少中和试验(金标准方法)测量了麻疹病毒中和抗体,并与IgG检测结果进行比较。在最敏感检测的低阳性范围内的样本中观察到了不一致的结果,但对于IgG阴性血清以及IgG水平处于中高水平的样本,各平台之间的一致性良好。约11%的血清中出现了假阴性检测结果,这些血清的中和抗体水平较低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验