Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
National Food Institute, Research Group for Analytical Food Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet Building 202, Kgs, Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark.
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 2;10(1):5808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62573-z.
Non-targeted and suspect analyses with liquid chromatography/electrospray/high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/HRMS) are gaining importance as they enable identification of hundreds or even thousands of compounds in a single sample. Here, we present an approach to address the challenge to quantify compounds identified from LC/HRMS data without authentic standards. The approach uses random forest regression to predict the response of the compounds in ESI/HRMS with a mean error of 2.2 and 2.0 times for ESI positive and negative mode, respectively. We observe that the predicted responses can be transferred between different instruments via a regression approach. Furthermore, we applied the predicted responses to estimate the concentration of the compounds without the standard substances. The approach was validated by quantifying pesticides and mycotoxins in six different cereal samples. For applicability, the accuracy of the concentration prediction needs to be compatible with the effect (e.g. toxicology) predictions. We achieved the average quantification error of 5.4 times, which is well compatible with the accuracy of the toxicology predictions.
非靶向和可疑分析与液相色谱/电喷雾/高分辨质谱联用(LC/ESI/HRMS)越来越重要,因为它们能够在单个样品中鉴定数百甚至数千种化合物。在这里,我们提出了一种方法来解决从 LC/HRMS 数据中鉴定化合物而没有标准品进行定量的挑战。该方法使用随机森林回归来预测 ESI/HRMS 中化合物的响应,ESI 正离子模式和负离子模式的平均误差分别为 2.2 和 2.0 倍。我们观察到,通过回归方法可以在不同仪器之间转移预测的响应。此外,我们应用预测的响应来估算没有标准物质的化合物的浓度。该方法通过定量分析六种不同谷物样品中的农药和霉菌毒素进行了验证。为了适用性,浓度预测的准确性需要与(例如毒理学)预测的效果兼容。我们实现了平均定量误差为 5.4 倍,与毒理学预测的准确性非常兼容。