Reese Lukas, Baumgartner Katrin, Fersen Lorenzo von, Merle Roswitha, Ladwig-Wiegard Mechthild, Will Hermann, Haase Gudrun, Tallo-Parra Oriol, Carbajal Annaïs, Lopez-Bejar Manel, Thöne-Reineke Christa
Animal Behaviour and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute of Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, Germany.
Tiergarten Nürnberg, Am Tiergarten 30, D-90480 Nuremberg, Germany.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 1;10(4):605. doi: 10.3390/ani10040605.
Deflighting zoo birds is a practice that receives increasing criticism due to its presumed incompatibility with animal welfare. To our knowledge, this is the first approach to address this problem in a scientific way. To do this, we compared feather corticosterone (CORTf) from Greater Flamingos (, n = 151) of different flight status (i.e., pinioned, feather clipped, airworthy) from twelve different zoological institutions. To complement the hormone measurements, behavioral observations (scan samplings) were conducted prior to feather sampling within the presumed time frame of feather growth. We hypothesized that CORTf of the deflighted flamingos would differ from CORTf of their airworthy conspecifics. No significant difference in CORTf was found between the three groups, and our hypothesis was rejected. However, the impact of the institution itself (i.e., the housing conditions) proved to be the most dominant variable (variance between the institutions = 53.82%). Due to high variability, the behavioral observations were evaluated descriptively but did not give rise to doubt the findings in CORTf. Therefore, we assume that the method of flight restraint of Greater Flamingos does not have a measurable effect on CORTf. We consider this model for evaluating animal welfare of zoo birds a useful tool and provide ideas for further adjustments for consecutive studies.
对动物园鸟类进行去羽操作这种做法因被认为与动物福利不相容而受到越来越多的批评。据我们所知,这是首次以科学方式解决该问题的方法。为此,我们比较了来自十二个不同动物园机构的不同飞行状态(即翅膀被固定、羽毛被修剪、具备飞行能力)的大火烈鸟(n = 151)的羽毛皮质酮(CORTf)。为补充激素测量,在羽毛采样前,于假定的羽毛生长时间范围内进行了行为观察(扫描取样)。我们假设去羽火烈鸟的CORTf会与其具备飞行能力的同种个体的CORTf有所不同。三组之间未发现CORTf有显著差异,我们的假设被否定。然而,事实证明机构本身的影响(即饲养条件)是最主要的变量(机构间方差 = 53.82%)。由于变异性高,行为观察仅进行了描述性评估,但并未对CORTf的研究结果产生质疑。因此,我们认为对大火烈鸟的飞行限制方法对CORTf没有可测量的影响。我们认为这种评估动物园鸟类动物福利的模型是一种有用的工具,并为后续研究的进一步调整提供了思路。