Lee Juhee, F Thall Peter, Msaouel Pavlos
Department of Statistics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 10;39(15):2035-2050. doi: 10.1002/sim.8528. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
A Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding design is presented for a clinical trial with four coprimary outcomes that reflect the actual clinical observation process. During a prespecified fixed follow-up period, the times to disease progression, toxicity, and death are monitored continuously, and an ordinal disease status variable, including progressive disease (PD) as one level, is evaluated repeatedly by scheduled imaging. We assume a proportional hazards model with piecewise constant baseline hazard for each continuous variable and a longitudinal multinomial probit model for the ordinal disease status process and include multivariate patient frailties to induce association among the outcomes. A finite partition of the nonfatal outcome combinations during the follow-up period is constructed, and the utility of each set in the partition is elicited. Posterior mean utility is used to optimize each patient's dose, subject to a safety rule excluding doses with an unacceptably high rate of PD, severe toxicity, or death. A simulation study shows that, compared with the proposed design, a simpler design based on commonly used efficacy and toxicity outcomes obtained by combining the four variables described above performs poorly and has substantially smaller probabilities of correctly choosing truly optimal doses and excluding truly unsafe doses.
提出了一种贝叶斯I-II期剂量探索设计,用于一项具有四个共同主要结局的临床试验,这些结局反映了实际的临床观察过程。在预先指定的固定随访期内,持续监测疾病进展、毒性和死亡时间,并通过定期成像反复评估一个有序疾病状态变量,其中将疾病进展(PD)作为一个等级。对于每个连续变量,我们假设一个具有分段常数基线风险的比例风险模型,对于有序疾病状态过程假设一个纵向多项probit模型,并纳入多变量患者脆弱性以诱导结局之间的关联。构建随访期内非致命结局组合的有限划分,并得出划分中每组的效用。后验平均效用用于优化每个患者的剂量,但需遵循一项安全规则,即排除具有不可接受的高PD率、严重毒性或死亡率的剂量。一项模拟研究表明,与所提出的设计相比,基于通过组合上述四个变量获得的常用疗效和毒性结局的更简单设计表现较差,正确选择真正最佳剂量和排除真正不安全剂量的概率要小得多。