Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.
J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010701. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010701.
Women's and men's health outcomes are different. Some differences are biological, related to male and female sex, while others are related to their gender. Sex- and gender-related issues require different solutions, but policy makers lack straightforward heuristic strategies to identify gender-related health inequities.
Using 169 causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from the 2017 Global Burden of Disease, we calculated the female-to-male (f:m) and male-to-female (m:f) ratios of global DALYs, rank-ordered the ratios by size and calculated the proportion of all-cause DALYs that each cause explained, separately for males and females 15-49 years old. Gender-related vs sex-related causes were categorised using literature on the drivers for the 15 causes with highest f:m and m:f ratios.
Causes of DALYs with high m:f ratios appear to be gendered and include: road injuries, interpersonal violence, and drowning - totaling 12.4% of men's (15-49 years) all-cause DALYs. However, causes of DALYs with high f:m ratios are more likely a mix of sex-related and gender-related factors - including headache disorders, depressive disorders, and dietary iron deficiency - totaling 13.4% of women's (15-49 years) all-cause DALYs. Ratios vary by age, geography and Socio-demographic Index.
Gender-related vs sex-related causes were categorised using available literature on the drivers for selected causes, illustrating that sex-disaggregated data represents a mix of social and biological influences. This analysis offers a model that policy makers can use to uncover potential gender inequalities in health, including intersections with other social factors. From it, new challenges emerge for global health policy makers and practitioners willing to address them. Global health actors will need to achieve a balance between the two agendas of global health and gender equality.
女性和男性的健康结果不同。一些差异是生物学上的,与男性和女性的性别有关,而另一些则与他们的性别有关。与性别有关的问题需要不同的解决方案,但政策制定者缺乏直接的启发式策略来确定与性别有关的健康不平等。
使用 2017 年全球疾病负担的 169 种残疾调整生命年(DALY)原因,我们计算了全球 DALY 的女性与男性(f:m)和男性与女性(m:f)比例,按大小对比例进行排序,并计算了每个原因分别占 15-49 岁男性和女性所有原因 DALY 的比例。使用关于 15 种 f:m 和 m:f 比值最高原因的驱动因素的文献,对与性别有关和与性别有关的原因进行分类。
高 m:f 比值的 DALY 原因似乎是性别化的,包括:道路伤害、人际暴力和溺水——占男性(15-49 岁)所有原因 DALY 的 12.4%。然而,高 f:m 比值的 DALY 原因更可能是性相关和性别相关因素的混合——包括头痛障碍、抑郁障碍和饮食铁缺乏——占女性(15-49 岁)所有原因 DALY 的 13.4%。比值因年龄、地理位置和社会人口指数而异。
使用关于选定原因驱动因素的现有文献对与性别有关和与性别有关的原因进行分类,说明按性别分类的数据代表了社会和生物影响的混合。该分析为政策制定者提供了一个模型,用于发现健康方面可能存在的性别不平等,包括与其他社会因素的交叉点。从中,全球卫生政策制定者和实践者面临新的挑战,他们愿意解决这些问题。全球卫生行为体将需要在全球卫生和性别平等这两个议程之间取得平衡。