Suppr超能文献

利用替代生物测定方法探索拟除虫菊酯抗性对长效驱虫蚊帐效果的影响。

Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Parasit Vectors. 2020 Apr 7;13(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04055-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is substantial concern that the spread of insecticide resistance will render long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) ineffective. However, there is limited evidence supporting a clear association between insecticide resistance and malaria incidence or prevalence in the field. We suggest that one reason for this disconnect is that the standard WHO assays used in surveillance to classify mosquito populations as resistant are not designed to determine how resistance might impact LLIN efficacy. The standard assays expose young, unfed female mosquitoes to a diagnostic insecticide dose in a single, forced exposure, whereas in the field, mosquitoes vary in their age, blood-feeding status, and the frequency or intensity of LLIN exposure. These more realistic conditions could ultimately impact the capacity of "resistant" mosquitoes to transmit malaria.

METHODS

Here, we test this hypothesis using two different assays that allow female mosquitoes to contact a LLIN as they host-seek and blood-feed. We quantified mortality after both single and multiple exposures, using seven different strains of Anopheles ranging in pyrethroid resistance intensity.

RESULTS

We found that strains classified as 1×-resistant to the pyrethroid insecticide deltamethrin in the standard WHO assay exhibited > 90% mortality over 24 h following more realistic LLIN contact. Mosquitoes that were able to blood-feed had increased survival compared to their unfed counterparts, but none of the 1×-resistant strains survived for 12 days post-exposure (the typical period for malaria parasite development within the mosquito). Mosquitoes that were 5×- and 10×-resistant (i.e. moderate or high intensity resistance based on the WHO assays) survived a single LLIN exposure well. However, only about 2-3% of these mosquitoes survived multiple exposures over the course of 12 days and successfully blood-fed during the last exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the standard assays provide limited insight into how resistance might impact LLIN efficacy. In our laboratory setting, there appears little functional consequence of 1×-resistance and even mosquitoes with moderate (5×) or high (10×) intensity resistance can suffer substantial reduction in transmission potential. Monitoring efforts should focus on better characterizing intensity of resistance to inform resistance management strategies and prioritize deployment of next generation vector control products.

摘要

背景

人们普遍担心,杀虫剂耐药性的传播将使长效驱虫蚊帐(LLIN)失去效果。然而,目前仅有有限的证据支持在现场发现杀虫剂耐药性与疟疾发病率或流行率之间存在明确关联。我们认为,造成这种脱节的一个原因是,目前用于监测以将蚊子种群归类为耐药的世界卫生组织(WHO)标准检测方法,并非旨在确定耐药性如何影响 LLIN 的功效。这些标准检测方法在单次强制暴露中使年轻、未进食的雌性蚊子接触诊断性杀虫剂剂量,而在现场,蚊子的年龄、吸血状态以及接触 LLIN 的频率或强度各不相同。这些更现实的条件最终可能会影响“耐药”蚊子传播疟疾的能力。

方法

在这里,我们使用两种不同的检测方法来检验这一假设,这两种方法允许雌性蚊子在寻找宿主和吸血时接触 LLIN。我们使用七种不同的按拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂抗药性强度分类的按蚊品系,量化了单次和多次接触后的死亡率。

结果

我们发现,在 WHO 标准检测中被归类为对拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂溴氰菊酯具有 1×抗性的品系,在更现实的 LLIN 接触后 24 小时内,死亡率超过 90%。能够吸血的蚊子与未进食的蚊子相比,存活率有所提高,但没有任何 1×抗性品系能在接触后 12 天(即疟原虫在蚊子体内发育的典型周期)存活下来。5×和 10×抗性(即根据 WHO 检测方法,中度或高度耐药性)的蚊子能很好地耐受单次 LLIN 暴露。然而,在 12 天的过程中,只有约 2-3%的这些蚊子能耐受多次暴露,并且在最后一次暴露期间成功吸血。

结论

这些结果表明,标准检测方法提供了对耐药性如何影响 LLIN 功效的有限见解。在我们的实验室环境中,1×耐药性几乎没有功能后果,即使是具有中度(5×)或高度(10×)耐药性的蚊子,其传播能力也会大幅降低。监测工作应侧重于更好地描述耐药性的强度,以为耐药性管理策略提供信息,并优先部署下一代病媒控制产品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6b/7140572/8515d3c75cc3/13071_2020_4055_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验