Suppr超能文献

面向老年人的认知治疗:系统综述的系统概述。

Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rev. 2020 Jun;30(2):167-193. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Abstract

Cognition-oriented treatments - commonly categorized as cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation - are promising approaches for the prevention of cognitive and functional decline in older adults. We conducted a systematic overview of meta-analyses investigating the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes in older adults with or without cognitive impairment. Review quality was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR). We identified 51 eligible reviews, 46 of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. The confidence ratings were "moderate" for 9 (20%), "low" for 13 (28%) and "critically low" for 24 (52%) of the 46 reviews. While most reviews provided pooled effect estimates for objective cognition, non-cognitive outcomes of potential relevance were more sparsely reported. The mean effect estimate on cognition was small for cognitive training in healthy older adults (mean Hedges' g = 0.32, range 0.13-0.64, 19 reviews), mild cognitive impairment (mean Hedges' g = 0.40, range 0.32-0.60, five reviews), and dementia (mean Hedges' g = 0.38, range 0.09-1.16, seven reviews), and small for cognitive stimulation in dementia (mean Hedges' g = 0.36, range 0.26-0.44, five reviews). Meta-regression revealed that higher AMSTAR score was associated with larger effect estimates for cognitive outcomes. The available evidence supports the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments improving cognitive performance in older adults. The extent to which such effects are of clinical value remains unclear, due to the scarcity of high-quality evidence and heterogeneity in reported findings. An important avenue for future trials is to include relevant non-cognitive outcomes in a more consistent way and, for meta-analyses in the field, there is a need for better adherence to methodological standards. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084490.

摘要

认知导向治疗 - 通常分为认知训练、认知康复和认知刺激 - 是预防老年人认知和功能下降的有前途的方法。我们对元分析进行了系统综述,调查了认知导向治疗对认知和非认知结果的疗效在有或没有认知障碍的老年人中。通过评估系统综述的测量工具(AMSTAR)来评估综述质量。我们确定了 51 篇合格的综述,其中 46 篇被纳入定量综合分析。46 篇综述中,有 9 篇(20%)的置信度评级为“中度”,13 篇(28%)为“低度”,24 篇(52%)为“极低度”。虽然大多数综述提供了针对客观认知的汇总效应估计,但更广泛报道的潜在相关非认知结果却很少。对于健康老年人的认知训练(19 项综述的平均 Hedges'g=0.32,范围为 0.13-0.64)、轻度认知障碍(mean Hedges' g=0.40,范围 0.32-0.60,5 项研究)和痴呆(mean Hedges' g=0.38,范围 0.09-1.16,7 项研究),认知刺激对痴呆的影响较小(mean Hedges' g=0.36,范围 0.26-0.44,5 项研究)。元回归显示,AMSTAR 评分较高与认知结果的效应估计值较大相关。现有证据支持认知导向治疗改善老年人认知表现的疗效。由于高质量证据的稀缺性和报告结果的异质性,这些效果在多大程度上具有临床价值仍不清楚。未来试验的一个重要方向是更一致地纳入相关的非认知结果,并且对于该领域的荟萃分析,需要更好地遵守方法学标准。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018084490。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c88/7305099/f5e2f7706895/11065_2020_9434_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验