• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

授予徽章是否增加了数据共享?一项随机对照试验。

Did awarding badges increase data sharing in ? A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Rowhani-Farid Anisa, Aldcroft Adrian, Barnett Adrian G

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 18;7(3):191818. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191818. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.191818
PMID:32269804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7137948/
Abstract

Sharing data and code are important components of reproducible research. Data sharing in research is widely discussed in the literature; however, there are no well-established evidence-based incentives that reward data sharing, nor randomized studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of data sharing policies at increasing data sharing. A simple incentive, such as an Open Data Badge, might provide the change needed to increase data sharing in health and medical research. This study was a parallel group randomized controlled trial (protocol registration: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/PXWZQ) with two groups, control and intervention, with 80 research articles published in per group, with a total of 160 research articles. The intervention group received an email offer for an Open Data Badge if they shared their data along with their final publication and the control group received an email with no offer of a badge if they shared their data with their final publication. The primary outcome was the data sharing rate. Badges did not noticeably motivate researchers who published in to share their data; the odds of awarding badges were nearly equal in the intervention and control groups (odds ratio = 0.9, 95% CI [0.1, 9.0]). Data sharing rates were low in both groups, with just two datasets shared in each of the intervention and control groups. The global movement towards open science has made significant gains with the development of numerous data sharing policies and tools. What remains to be established is an effective incentive that motivates researchers to take up such tools to share their data.

摘要

共享数据和代码是可重复研究的重要组成部分。研究中的数据共享在文献中得到了广泛讨论;然而,目前尚无完善的基于证据的激励措施来奖励数据共享,也没有随机研究证明数据共享政策在增加数据共享方面的有效性。一个简单的激励措施,比如开放数据徽章,可能会为增加健康和医学研究中的数据共享提供所需的改变。本研究是一项平行组随机对照试验(方案注册号:doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/PXWZQ),分为对照组和干预组,每组发表80篇研究文章,共160篇研究文章。干预组如果在最终发表文章时共享其数据,会收到一封提供开放数据徽章的电子邮件,而对照组如果在最终发表文章时共享其数据,则会收到一封不提供徽章的电子邮件。主要结果是数据共享率。徽章并没有显著激励在[具体期刊名称未给出]上发表文章的研究人员共享他们的数据;干预组和对照组授予徽章的几率几乎相等(优势比=0.9,95%置信区间[0.1,9.0])。两组的数据共享率都很低,干预组和对照组各只有两个数据集被共享。随着众多数据共享政策和工具的发展,全球开放科学运动取得了重大进展。有待确立的是一种有效的激励措施,促使研究人员使用此类工具来共享他们的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/7341e16cc943/rsos191818-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/87baa281509a/rsos191818-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/0b8bf0041d08/rsos191818-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/c3be0aea4ee6/rsos191818-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/7341e16cc943/rsos191818-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/87baa281509a/rsos191818-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/0b8bf0041d08/rsos191818-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/c3be0aea4ee6/rsos191818-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf05/7137948/7341e16cc943/rsos191818-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Did awarding badges increase data sharing in ? A randomized controlled trial.授予徽章是否增加了数据共享?一项随机对照试验。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Mar 18;7(3):191818. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191818. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
What's in a Badge? A Computational Reproducibility Investigation of the Open Data Badge Policy in One Issue of .徽章背后的含义是什么?对《数据开放杂志》一期中开放数据徽章政策的计算可重复性调查。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):512-522. doi: 10.1177/09567976221140828. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study.开放数据是否已登陆《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)?一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 13;6(10):e011784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011784.
5
What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review.哪些激励措施能促进健康与医学研究中的数据共享?一项系统综述。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 May 5;2:4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0028-9. eCollection 2017.
6
Badges for sharing data and code at an observational study.在一项观察性研究中用于共享数据和代码的徽章。
F1000Res. 2018 Jan 19;7:90. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13477.2. eCollection 2018.
7
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in and .对具有完整数据共享政策的主要生物医学期刊中的随机对照试验进行数据共享和重新分析:对[具体年份1]和[具体年份2]发表的研究的调查
BMJ. 2018 Feb 13;360:k400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k400.
8
How often do cancer researchers make their data and code available and what factors are associated with sharing?癌症研究人员多久会分享他们的数据和代码,以及哪些因素与分享有关?
BMC Med. 2022 Nov 9;20(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02644-2.
9
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
10
Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review.激励研究数据共享:一项范围综述
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Apr 6;6:355. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17286.2. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Open science interventions to improve reproducibility and replicability of research: a scoping review.旨在提高研究可重复性和可复制性的开放科学干预措施:一项范围综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 9;12(4):242057. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242057. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India.研究中的可重复性和可再现性:美国和印度各大学452位教授的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0319334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319334. eCollection 2025.
3
Improving research transparency with individualized report cards: A feasibility study in clinical trials at a large university medical center.

本文引用的文献

1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
An environmental cleaning bundle and health-care-associated infections in hospitals (REACH): a multicentre, randomised trial.环境清洁包与医院相关性感染(REACH):一项多中心、随机试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;19(4):410-418. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30714-X. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017.2015-2017 年生物医学文献中的可重复性研究实践、透明度和开放获取数据。
使用个性化报告卡提高研究透明度:大型大学医学中心临床试验的可行性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02482-9.
4
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes.复制危机已经带来了积极的结构、程序和社区变革。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Jul 25;1(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2.
5
Workflow for detecting biomedical articles with underlying open and restricted-access datasets.检测具有潜在开放和限制访问数据集的生物医学文章的工作流程。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0302787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302787. eCollection 2024.
6
A survey of experimental stimulus presentation code sharing in major areas of psychology.心理学主要领域中实验刺激呈现代码共享情况的调查。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):6781-6791. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02390-8. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review protocol.改善科研设计与实施的干预措施:一项范围综述方案
NIHR Open Res. 2022 Jun 14;2:4. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13252.2. eCollection 2022.
8
COLLAGENE enables privacy-aware federated and collaborative genomic data analysis.COLLAGENE 实现了隐私感知的联邦和协作基因组数据分析。
Genome Biol. 2023 Sep 11;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03039-z.
9
Broad Medical Uncertainty and the ethical obligation for openness.广泛的医学不确定性与公开的道德义务。
Synthese. 2022;200(2):121. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03666-2. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
10
Now is the time to assess the effects of open science practiceswith randomized control trials.现在是时候用随机对照试验来评估开放科学实践的效果了。
Am Psychol. 2022 Apr;77(3):467-475. doi: 10.1037/amp0000871. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
PLoS Biol. 2018 Nov 20;16(11):e2006930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006930. eCollection 2018 Nov.
4
Badges for sharing data and code at an observational study.在一项观察性研究中用于共享数据和代码的徽章。
F1000Res. 2018 Jan 19;7:90. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13477.2. eCollection 2018.
5
Data sharing in psychology.心理学中的数据共享。
Am Psychol. 2018 Feb-Mar;73(2):111-125. doi: 10.1037/amp0000242.
6
What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review.哪些激励措施能促进健康与医学研究中的数据共享?一项系统综述。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 May 5;2:4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0028-9. eCollection 2017.
7
Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.临床试验数据共享声明:医学期刊编辑国际委员会的一项要求。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jul 4;167(1):63-65. doi: 10.7326/M17-1028. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
8
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices.期刊投稿指南对作者统计数据报告及开放研究实践应用的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0175583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175583. eCollection 2017.
9
Has open data arrived at the British Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study.开放数据是否已登陆《英国医学杂志》(BMJ)?一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 13;6(10):e011784. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011784.
10
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency.认可开放实践的徽章:一种提高透明度的简单、低成本且有效的方法。
PLoS Biol. 2016 May 12;14(5):e1002456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456. eCollection 2016 May.