• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过计算流体动力学与四维血流数据的优化匹配实现血流成像。

Blood flow imaging by optimal matching of computational fluid dynamics to 4D-flow data.

作者信息

Töger Johannes, Zahr Matthew J, Aristokleous Nicolas, Markenroth Bloch Karin, Carlsson Marcus, Persson Per-Olof

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2020 Oct;84(4):2231-2245. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28269. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.28269
PMID:32270549
Abstract

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional, time-resolved blood flow measurement (4D-flow) is a powerful research and clinical tool, but improved resolution and scan times are needed. Therefore, this study aims to (1) present a postprocessing framework for optimization-driven simulation-based flow imaging, called 4D-flow High-resolution Imaging with a priori Knowledge Incorporating the Navier-Stokes equations and the discontinuous Galerkin method (4D-flow HIKING), (2) investigate the framework in synthetic tests, (3) perform phantom validation using laser particle imaging velocimetry, and (4) demonstrate the use of the framework in vivo.

METHODS

An optimizing computational fluid dynamics solver including adjoint-based optimization was developed to fit computational fluid dynamics solutions to 4D-flow data. Synthetic tests were performed in 2D, and phantom validation was performed with pulsatile flow. Reference velocity data were acquired using particle imaging velocimetry, and 4D-flow data were acquired at 1.5 T. In vivo testing was performed on intracranial arteries in a healthy volunteer at 7 T, with 2D flow as the reference.

RESULTS

Synthetic tests showed low error (0.4%-0.7%). Phantom validation showed improved agreement with laser particle imaging velocimetry compared with input 4D-flow in the horizontal (mean -0.05 vs -1.11 cm/s, P < .001; SD 1.86 vs 4.26 cm/s, P < .001) and vertical directions (mean 0.05 vs -0.04 cm/s, P = .29; SD 1.36 vs 3.95 cm/s, P < .001). In vivo data show a reduction in flow rate error from 14% to 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Phantom and in vivo results from 4D-flow HIKING show promise for future applications with higher resolution, shorter scan times, and accurate quantification of physiological parameters.

摘要

目的

三维时间分辨血流测量(4D 血流)是一种强大的研究和临床工具,但仍需要提高分辨率和缩短扫描时间。因此,本研究旨在:(1)提出一种用于基于优化驱动的模拟血流成像的后处理框架,称为结合纳维 - 斯托克斯方程和间断伽辽金方法的具有先验知识的 4D 血流高分辨率成像(4D-flow HIKING);(2)在模拟测试中研究该框架;(3)使用激光粒子成像测速技术进行体模验证;(4)展示该框架在体内的应用。

方法

开发了一种包括基于伴随优化的计算流体动力学求解器来使计算流体动力学解决方案与 4D 血流数据相匹配。进行了二维模拟测试,并对脉动流进行了体模验证。使用粒子成像测速技术获取参考速度数据,并于 1.5 T 下采集 4D 血流数据(此处原文未明确说明采集 4D 血流数据的设备,推测可能是在 1.5 T 的磁共振设备上采集)。在 7 T 下对一名健康志愿者颅内动脉进行体内测试,以二维血流作为参考(此处原文未明确说明采集二维血流数据的设备,推测可能是在 7 T 的磁共振设备上采集)(此处推测是根据前文 4D-flow 数据采集设备推测二维血流数据采集可能也是在相应磁共振设备上进行)。

结果

模拟测试显示误差较低(0.4% - 0.7%)。与输入的 4D 血流相比,体模验证表明在水平方向(平均 -0.05 对 -1.11 cm/s,P <.001;标准差 1.86 对 4.

相似文献

1
Blood flow imaging by optimal matching of computational fluid dynamics to 4D-flow data.通过计算流体动力学与四维血流数据的优化匹配实现血流成像。
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Oct;84(4):2231-2245. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28269. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.用于评估模型中狭窄后湍流的四维流动MRI:与流量计和计算流体动力学的比较
Eur Radiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):3588-97. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4181-6. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.真实尺寸颅内动脉瘤模型中的复杂流型:相位对比 MRI 与粒子图像测速和计算流体动力学比较。
NMR Biomed. 2012 Jan;25(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1706. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Optimal Plane Selection for Measuring Post-prandial Blood Flow Increase within the Superior Mesenteric Artery: Analysis Using 4D Flow and Computational Fluid Dynamics.最佳平面选择用于测量肠系膜上动脉餐后血流增加:使用 4D 流和计算流体动力学进行分析。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020 Dec 1;19(4):366-374. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0089. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Validation and reproducibility of cardiovascular 4D-flow MRI from two vendors using 2 × 2 parallel imaging acceleration in pulsatile flow phantom and in vivo with and without respiratory gating.使用2×2并行成像加速技术,在脉动流模体以及有和没有呼吸门控的活体中,对两家供应商的心血管4D流磁共振成像进行验证和可重复性研究。
Acta Radiol. 2019 Mar;60(3):327-337. doi: 10.1177/0284185118784981. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.使用粒子图像测速技术和平面激光诱导荧光对四维流动磁共振速度和涡环体积进行独立验证。
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Mar;75(3):1064-75. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25683. Epub 2015 May 2.
7
Merging computational fluid dynamics and 4D Flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and ridge regression.使用本征正交分解和岭回归合并计算流体动力学和四维流动磁共振成像
J Biomech. 2017 Jun 14;58:162-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
Accelerated sequences of 4D flow MRI using GRAPPA and compressed sensing: A comparison against conventional MRI and computational fluid dynamics.使用 GRAPPA 和压缩感知的 4D 流 MRI 加速序列:与常规 MRI 和计算流体动力学的比较。
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Dec;88(6):2432-2446. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29404. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
9
Denoising and spatial resolution enhancement of 4D flow MRI using proper orthogonal decomposition and lasso regularization.基于本征正交分解和套索正则化的 4D 流 MRI 去噪与空间分辨率增强。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2018 Dec;70:165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
10
Enhancement of cerebrovascular 4D flow MRI velocity fields using machine learning and computational fluid dynamics simulation data.利用机器学习和计算流体动力学模拟数据增强脑血管 4D 流 MRI 速度场。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89636-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Conditional neural field latent diffusion model for generating spatiotemporal turbulence.用于生成时空湍流的条件神经场潜在扩散模型。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 29;15(1):10416. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54712-1.
2
Super-Resolving and Denoising 4D flow MRI of Neurofluids Using Physics-Guided Neural Networks.使用物理引导神经网络的神经流体超分辨率与去噪4D流磁共振成像
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Feb;53(2):331-347. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03606-w. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
3
Towards Reduced Order Models via Robust Proper Orthogonal Decomposition to capture personalised aortic haemodynamics.
通过鲁棒的特征正交分解(POD)来建立降阶模型,以捕捉个体化的主动脉血流动力学。
J Biomech. 2023 Sep;158:111759. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111759. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Patient-Specific Inverse Modeling of In Vivo Cardiovascular Mechanics with Medical Image-Derived Kinematics as Input Data: Concepts, Methods, and Applications.以医学图像衍生运动学作为输入数据的体内心血管力学患者特异性逆向建模:概念、方法及应用
Appl Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 2;12(8). doi: 10.3390/app12083954. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Advances in machine learning applications for cardiovascular 4D flow MRI.用于心血管4D流磁共振成像的机器学习应用进展。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 9;9:1052068. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1052068. eCollection 2022.
6
Synthesis of patient-specific multipoint 4D flow MRI data of turbulent aortic flow downstream of stenotic valves.合成狭窄瓣膜下游湍流主动脉流的患者特定多点 4D 流 MRI 数据。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 26;12(1):16004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20121-x.
7
SRflow: Deep learning based super-resolution of 4D-flow MRI data.SRflow:基于深度学习的4D流磁共振成像数据超分辨率技术
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Aug 12;5:928181. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.928181. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of 2D and 4D Flow MRI in Neonates Without General Anesthesia.在新生儿中,比较无全身麻醉的 2D 和 4D 流量 MRI。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Jan;57(1):71-82. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28303. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
9
Inverse problems in blood flow modeling: A review.血流建模中的反问题:综述。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022 Aug;38(8):e3613. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3613. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
4D Flow MR Imaging of the Left Atrium: What is Non-physiological Blood Flow in the Cardiac System?4D 血流磁共振成像左心房:心脏系统中的非生理血流是什么?
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Mar 1;21(2):293-308. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0137. Epub 2022 Feb 19.