• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《暂存空间:部落研究中的合作伙伴指南》。

The Holding Space: A Guide for Partners in Tribal Research.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):101-107. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0012.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2020.0012
PMID:32280127
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach is desired by American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) tribes, many researchers and tribes experience challenges in research partnerships. The aim of this project was to develop and disseminate an evidence-based training toolkit to help strengthen tribal-academic research partnerships. Our prior research found that governance, trust, and culture were essential pillars for successful community academic partnerships.

METHODS

This article describes the development and evaluation of the new Holding Space: A Guide for Partners in Tribal Research toolkit, which contains a Holding Space Discussion Guide and the Tribal Research Future Game, which are delivered in a training format for participants in tribal- academic research partnerships.

RESULTS

Results indicate that Holding Space is a useful tool for facilitating conversations and openly reflecting on practices within partnerships and may also be appropriate for a broader audience.

CONCLUSIONS

Future work includes further effectiveness studies as well as research focused on dissemination and implementation.

摘要

背景

虽然美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)部落希望采用基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法,但许多研究人员和部落在研究伙伴关系方面都面临挑战。本项目旨在开发和传播循证培训工具包,以帮助加强部落学术研究伙伴关系。我们之前的研究发现,治理、信任和文化是社区学术伙伴关系成功的重要支柱。

方法

本文描述了新的“空间容纳:部落研究指南”工具包的开发和评估,该工具包包含“空间容纳讨论指南”和“部落研究未来游戏”,以培训形式提供给部落学术研究伙伴关系中的参与者。

结果

结果表明,“空间容纳”是促进对话和公开反思伙伴关系内部实践的有用工具,也可能适合更广泛的受众。

结论

未来的工作包括进一步的有效性研究,以及专注于传播和实施的研究。

相似文献

1
The Holding Space: A Guide for Partners in Tribal Research.《暂存空间:部落研究中的合作伙伴指南》。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):101-107. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0012.
2
Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Design, Conduct, and Evaluate Randomized Controlled Trials with American Indian Communities.运用社区参与式研究来设计、实施和评估美国印第安人社区的随机对照试验。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Nov 12;17:E143. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200099.
3
Perspective Developing Successful Collaborative Research Partnerships with AI/AN Communities.与 AI/AN 社区建立成功的合作研究伙伴关系的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 28;18(17):9089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179089.
4
Research partnerships between academic institutions and American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes and organizations: effective strategies and lessons learned in a multisite CTN study.学术机构与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民部落和组织之间的研究伙伴关系:一项多地点 CTN 研究中的有效策略和经验教训。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2011 Sep;37(5):333-8. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.596976.
5
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
6
Assessing follow-up care after prostate-specific antigen elevation in American Indian / Alaska Native Men: a partnership approach.评估美国印第安/阿拉斯加原住民男性前列腺特异性抗原升高后的后续护理:一种合作方法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Summer;7(2):153-61. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0019.
7
Holding Space for All of Us.为我们所有人提供空间。
AMA J Ethics. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):E882-887. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.882.
8
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
9
Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research.人类受试者保护培训对社区参与性研究中社区合作伙伴的感知影响。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Summer;8(2):241-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0023.
10
Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.评估基于社区的参与性研究,以改善社区合作科学和社区健康。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):289-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0049.

引用本文的文献

1
Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations.数据信托、数据存储库和其他数据合作的治理和管理的基本要求。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Sep 20;8(4):2142. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i4.2142. eCollection 2023.
2
"You Can't Record That!" Engaging American Indian Traditional Healers in Qualitative Research.“你不能记录那个!”让美国印第安传统治疗师参与定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):e507-e509. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
3
A novel conceptual model of trauma-informed care for patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 illness (PASC).
创伤知情护理新模式用于治疗 SARS-CoV-2 疾病后急性后遗症(PASC)患者。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3618-3628. doi: 10.1111/jan.15426. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Ethical Issues in Conducting Cross-Cultural Research in Low-Income Countries: A Pakistani Perspective.在低收入国家开展跨文化研究中的伦理问题:巴基斯坦视角
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2021 Nov 6;14(2):151-168. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00196-w. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Recognising values and engaging communities across cultures: towards developing a cultural protocol for researchers.跨文化识别价值观和参与社区:制定研究人员文化规范的途径。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 26;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00608-4.