College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 28;18(17):9089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179089.
In the United States, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people are frequently under- or misrepresented in research and health statistics. A principal reason for this disparity is the lack of collaborative partnerships between researchers and tribes. There are hesitations from both academic Western scientists and tribal communities to establish new partnerships due to differences in cultural and scientific understanding, from data ownership and privacy to dissemination and project expansion. An infamous example is the mishandling of samples collected from the Havasupai Tribe by Arizona State University (ASU) scientists, leading to a legal battle between the tribe and ASU and ending in a moratorium of research with the Havasupai people. This paper will explore three successful and positive collaborations with a large and small tribe, including how the partnerships were established and the outcomes of the collaboration. In addition, the paper will provide perspective of what needs to be addressed by Western scientists if productive collaborations with tribal groups are to be established.
在美国,美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)在研究和健康统计中经常被低估或代表性不足。造成这种差异的一个主要原因是研究人员和部落之间缺乏合作关系。由于文化和科学理解、数据所有权和隐私、传播和项目扩展方面的差异,学术西方科学家和部落社区都不愿意建立新的合作伙伴关系。一个臭名昭著的例子是亚利桑那州立大学(ASU)科学家对哈瓦苏派部落采集的样本处理不当,导致部落和 ASU 之间的法律纠纷,并最终对哈瓦苏派人进行了研究暂停。本文将探讨与一个大部落和一个小部落的三个成功和积极的合作关系,包括合作伙伴关系是如何建立的以及合作的结果。此外,本文还将从西方科学家的角度出发,探讨如果要与部落群体建立富有成效的合作关系,需要解决哪些问题。