Michigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Department of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0221606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221606. eCollection 2020.
Reducing unplanned readmissions is a major focus of current hospital quality efforts. In order to avoid unfair penalization, administrators and policymakers use prediction models to adjust for the performance of hospitals from healthcare claims data. Regression-based models are a commonly utilized method for such risk-standardization across hospitals; however, these models often suffer in accuracy. In this study we, compare four prediction models for unplanned patient readmission for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive health failure (HF), and pneumonia (PNA) within the Nationwide Readmissions Database in 2014. We evaluated hierarchical logistic regression and compared its performance with gradient boosting and two models that utilize artificial neural networks. We show that unsupervised Global Vector for Word Representations embedding representations of administrative claims data combined with artificial neural network classification models improves prediction of 30-day readmission. Our best models increased the AUC for prediction of 30-day readmissions from 0.68 to 0.72 for AMI, 0.60 to 0.64 for HF, and 0.63 to 0.68 for PNA compared to hierarchical logistic regression. Furthermore, risk-standardized hospital readmission rates calculated from our artificial neural network model that employed embeddings led to reclassification of approximately 10% of hospitals across categories of hospital performance. This finding suggests that prediction models that incorporate new methods classify hospitals differently than traditional regression-based approaches and that their role in assessing hospital performance warrants further investigation.
降低非计划性再入院率是当前医院质量工作的重点。为了避免不公平的惩罚,管理人员和政策制定者使用预测模型,根据医疗保健索赔数据调整医院的表现。基于回归的模型是医院间风险标准化的常用方法;然而,这些模型的准确性往往不尽如人意。在这项研究中,我们比较了 2014 年全国再入院数据库中急性心肌梗死(AMI)、充血性心力衰竭(HF)和肺炎(PNA)住院患者的四种非计划性患者再入院预测模型。我们评估了分层逻辑回归,并将其性能与梯度提升和两种利用人工神经网络的模型进行了比较。我们表明,无监督的全局向量表示对行政索赔数据的表示与人工神经网络分类模型相结合,可以提高 30 天再入院的预测效果。我们最好的模型将 AMI 的 30 天再入院预测 AUC 从 0.68 提高到 0.72,HF 的 AUC 从 0.60 提高到 0.64,PNA 的 AUC 从 0.63 提高到 0.68,与分层逻辑回归相比。此外,我们的人工神经网络模型,采用嵌入技术,计算出的风险标准化医院再入院率对医院绩效类别进行了约 10%的重新分类。这一发现表明,纳入新方法的预测模型对医院的分类与传统的基于回归的方法不同,它们在评估医院绩效方面的作用值得进一步研究。