Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4806-4815. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06786-w. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
To assess interreader agreement of manual prostate cancer lesion segmentation on multiparametric MR images (mpMRI). The secondary aim was to compare tumor volume estimates between MRI segmentation and transperineal template saturation core needle biopsy (TTSB).
We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone mpMRI of the prostate at our institution and who had received TTSB within 190 days of the examination. Seventy-eight cancer lesions with Gleason score of at least 3 + 4 = 7 were manually segmented in T2-weighted images by 3 radiologists and 1 medical student. Twenty lesions were also segmented in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) series. First, 20 volumetric similarity scores were computed to quantify interreader agreement. Second, manually segmented cancer lesion volumes were compared with TTSB-derived estimates by Bland-Altman analysis and Wilcoxon testing.
Interreader agreement across all readers was only moderate with mean T2 Dice score of 0.57 (95%CI 0.39-0.70), volumetric similarity coefficient of 0.74 (0.48-0.89), and Hausdorff distance of 5.23 mm (3.17-9.32 mm). Discrepancy of volume estimate between MRI and TTSB was increasing with tumor size. Discrepancy was significantly different between tumors with a Gleason score 3 + 4 vs. higher grade tumors (0.66 ml vs. 0.78 ml; p = 0.007). There were no significant differences between T2, ADC, and DCE segmentations.
We found at best moderate interreader agreement of manual prostate cancer segmentation in mpMRI. Additionally, our study suggests a systematic discrepancy between the tumor volume estimate by MRI segmentation and TTSB core length, especially for large and high-grade tumors.
• Manual prostate cancer segmentation in mpMRI shows moderate interreader agreement. • There are no significant differences between T2, ADC, and DCE segmentation agreements. • There is a systematic difference between volume estimates derived from biopsy and MRI.
评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)上手动前列腺癌病变分割的读者间一致性。次要目的是比较 MRI 分割和经会阴模板饱和核心针活检(TTSB)之间的肿瘤体积估计值。
我们回顾性分析了在我院行 mpMRI 检查且在检查后 190 天内接受 TTSB 的患者。由 3 名放射科医生和 1 名医学生在 T2 加权图像上手动分割 78 个 Gleason 评分至少为 3+4=7 的癌灶。20 个病灶还在表观弥散系数(ADC)和动态对比增强(DCE)系列中进行分割。首先,计算 20 个体积相似性评分来量化读者间的一致性。其次,通过 Bland-Altman 分析和 Wilcoxon 检验比较手动分割的癌灶体积与 TTSB 衍生的估计值。
所有读者的读者间一致性仅为中度,平均 T2 Dice 评分 0.57(95%CI 0.39-0.70),体积相似性系数 0.74(0.48-0.89),Hausdorff 距离 5.23mm(3.17-9.32mm)。MRI 和 TTSB 之间的体积估计差异随肿瘤大小而增加。Gleason 评分 3+4 的肿瘤与高级别肿瘤之间的差异具有统计学意义(0.66ml 与 0.78ml;p=0.007)。T2、ADC 和 DCE 分割之间无显著差异。
我们发现,mpMRI 上手动前列腺癌分割的读者间一致性最好为中度。此外,我们的研究表明,MRI 分割和 TTSB 核心长度之间的肿瘤体积估计存在系统差异,尤其是对于大肿瘤和高级别肿瘤。